Slashdot Mirror


King Tut's Chariot a Marvel of Ancient Engineering

astroengine writes "King Tutankhamun, who ruled Egypt over 3,000 years ago, looks as if he was chauffeured around the desert in one of the earliest-known high-performance vehicles. Tut's chariots surpass all monumental structures of the pharaohs in engineering sophistication. Discovered in pieces by British archaeologist Howard Carter when he entered King Tut's treasure-packed tomb in 1922, the collection consisted of two large ceremonial chariots, a smaller highly decorated one, and three others that were lighter and made for daily use. 'These vehicles appear to be the first mechanical systems which combine the use of kinematics, dynamics and lubrication principles,' said Alberto Rovetta, professor in robotics engineering at the Polytechnic of Milan."

4 of 124 comments (clear)

  1. Re:HOLY AMAZING! by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Informative

    Light is easy, light and strong is sophisticated. Also, the article alludes to springs and shock absorbers, a step up in engineering from just building a light and strong cart.

  2. Re:Um, Not? by blair1q · · Score: 5, Informative

    Egypt isn't all sand dunes. Near the Nile it's pretty light on the sand dunes, and 4600 years ago could have been even less sand-duney.

    They even had paved roads.

  3. Re:HOLY AMAZING! by fishbowl · · Score: 5, Informative

    >Other than the 3d rendering (uhhh, why not a photo?!)

    I would bet that it is related to the fact that the article doesn't feature Zahi Hawass chiming in.

    It's funny how much control Hawass has on what is said and shown about Egyptian antiquity.

    Now you'll notice that you rarely, if *ever*, see anything in Egypt without Zahi Hawass telling you what to think about it.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  4. Re:Exaggeration of Ancient Greece that is .... by realityimpaired · · Score: 4, Informative

    Tragedy, not Travesty. It's a tragedy that it burned down. It's not, however, a travesty, unless you consider the irony in the fact that the fire was set by the Romans in an effort to limit the communication of their enemies. Even then, though, the fire was set on docked ships, it's just that it got out of control and spread to the docks themselves and then the city of Alexandria... the library itself was not intentionally burned down: it was an accident.