Slashdot Mirror


Tech Specs Leaked For French Spyware

An anonymous reader writes "With the 'three strikes' law now in effect in France, the organization tasked with implementing it, Hadopi, has been working on technology specs for making the process work — and those specs have now leaked. It appears to involve client-side monitoring and controlling software, that would try to watch what you were doing online, and even warn you before you used any P2P protocol (must make Skype phone calls fun). It's hard to believe people will accept this kind of thing being installed on their computers, so I can't wait to see how Hadopi moves forward with it. It also appears to violate EU rules on privacy."

15 of 212 comments (clear)

  1. Not to worry by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The government pinky-promised that they won't use this for anything other than enforcing this law. And you have their *word* on that.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Not to worry by mlts · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just wait until the blackhats get ahold of this and change the phone home site from the standard to the blackhat's servers. Voila, instant botnet that is illegal for a French citizen to remove. I'm sure the guys on Elbonia are just drooling over that they can do once they can poison an ISP's DNS to get command/control access to the machines.

    2. Re:Not to worry by HungryHobo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The internet seems to be going down the shitter now that all the politicians kids are using it and those in power have started thinking internet==facebook.

      So what's the next communication medium that the government has so little understanding of that they don't even think about regulating it?

      Darknets are halfway there but they'll probably be outlawed in a few years.

    3. Re:Not to worry by Buddy027 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why change it? Just add their own URL. It can still phone home so it looks like it still works. Even sending in false data.

  2. Good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What are they going to do? Fucking outlaw Mac OS X, Linux and all the other non-Microsoft operating systems?

    Funny fact: in french it's called système d'exploitation. Maybe that's why they want such software. To exploit you and your computer.

  3. Re:Woot by kipd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They came first for the Windows-users, and I didn't speak up because I didn't use Windows...

  4. FrenchGeek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Can't wait to see the French Gov. forcing me to install this kind of software on my computer.
    VPN is still safe for now I guess ...

    They will have to enforce this law on any computer entering the country, I can see lines forming at the customs where a Gov official will install something on tourists computers.

    The French government has better things to do than trying to regulate the internet...

    Hadopi will fail because it is already obsolete, what a fucking good way to waste tax payers money...

  5. P2P isn't illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    The act of using peer to peer software isn't illegal. Downloading content with peer to peer software isn't illegal. Downloading copyrighted content with *ANY* software will infringe someones copyright. Driving cars should be as illegal as using p2p software, since both can be abused! Cars are still on the road though. Pedestrians are killed and cars are still on the road. P2P is used to distribute software (some of it legal, some of it illegal), lets quit throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

  6. So how Naive are the French? by Dyinobal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looking over the spec I can't honestly think that the French are dumb enough to think something like this could work, the scope is to broad, and software solutions are silly easy to bypass.

  7. client-side enforcement is stupid by bugs2squash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The whole suggestion of enforcing this client-side is so idiotic that I'm inclined to believe that there will be ISP-side enforcement and that in fact the client is only there to warn the user.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  8. Re:Woot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh, nice! Can I have the Linux version?

    No, Linux is now illegal because it can't be monitored by this software.

  9. Re:Woot by cpghost · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Which one do you prefer? qt-hadopi, gtk-hadopi, ... or just that plain old fashioned nvidia/ati binary blob driver for your graphics adapter?

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  10. We Joke, but... by carp3_noct3m · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know we around /. like to joke about things like encryption and the year of the linux desktop, but the more intrusive governments get, the more I see the internet as a whole routing around this damage and increasing both the use of *nix based systems and encryption. Imagine facebook levels of popularity but with encryption, privacy, and control as primary factors of computing for the masses. Because, in the end, its either that or we might as well just start walking around naked because we have "nothing to hide".

    --
    "It's ok, I'm completely secure as long as my iron is off"
  11. Re:Sarkozy is the pawn of the media elite in Franc by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > So much for liberté... we still have egalité and fraternité (until further notice)

    Unless you are Roma.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  12. Re:Encryption is not the answer by John+Hasler · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If encryption approached "Facebook levels of popularity", governments who want to monitor your traffic will simply make encryption illegal.

    If encryption approached "Facebook levels of popularity" it would be far too late for most governments to outlaw it.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.