Slashdot Mirror


Web-Based Private File Storage?

steve802 writes "Recently, someone died in our company, and word is getting around that the admins who were given access to his Outlook account have found personal things that are embarrassing at best (the rumor mill differs on what was found). No matter, it raises a question. I have personal stuff in Outlook folders that I would not want someone in IT to see if I suddenly dropped dead: emails to the wife, photos of the kids, that kind of thing. I also keep a journal at home that I save to a server; personal reflections that I never want anyone else to see, especially if I die. So I was thinking that some sort of web-based storage for files, individual emails, and perhaps even Outlook folders would be perfect. All my most private personal stuff in one place. I found CryptoHeaven, which seems to offer some of what I'm looking for — but it is pricey. I'm willing to pay, but something less than $400/year would be nice. Best would be a service with a dead-man's switch, so that if I don't access it in, say, three months, it auto-purges. Any thoughts?"

3 of 467 comments (clear)

  1. Web-Based Private Is An Oxymoron by Maarx · · Score: 4, Informative

    Web-Based Private is an oxymoron. Why does this have to be web-based?

    It would be pretty trivial to set up a Linux distro with two hard drives, one with the simple operating system and the other an encrypted drive with a passphrase, and set up the OS to nuke the second drive if the current time is ever greater than three months from the last time the passphrase was successfully supplied.

  2. Re:Separate them by shentino · · Score: 5, Informative

    Indeed.

    Best solution to keeping your boss out of your personal stuff? Don't do personal stuff on company time.

  3. Re:TrueCrypt? by ds_job · · Score: 4, Informative

    Which is what the two key "Plausible Deniability" feature is all about:
    http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/?s=plausible-deniability