Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

VideoLAN Announces libaacs

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the i-hear-what-you're-doing-there dept.

supersloshy writes "VideoLAN, makers of the well-known media player VLC, have just announced a new project called libaacs. The libaacs library's intention is to provide a free software library to implement the AACS specification, the copy-protection found on things such as Blu-ray discs. Note that this isn't meant to actually be a decoding library. It includes no AACS keys and is solely developed for research purposes."

3 of 105 comments (clear)

  1. Without the keys, it's 1201(g) by tepples · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd like to see how such a cease-and-desist notice might be worded. From the summary: "It includes no AACS keys". From the article: "this project doesn't offer any key or certificate that could be used to decode encrypted copyrighted material." So without the player keys, it's not a complete circumvention device but instead an encryption research project, exempt under 17 USC 1201(g). And even if it did have keys, the interoperability exemption in 1201(f) combined with the fair use exemption that the Register of Copyrights recently enacted for three years might save it.

  2. Translation of research exception in the law by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the cited ruling which discusses application of the EU ban on circumventing DRM:

    Ces dispositions ne s'appliquent pas aux actes qui ne portent pas préjudice aux titulaires de droits et qui sont réalisés à des fins de sécurité informatique ou à des fins de recherche scientifique en cryptographie

    Which roughly translates to:

    These provisions do not apply to acts which do not interfere with rights-holders or to acts carried out for computer security purposes or for scientific research or cryptographic purposes.

    So libaacs is legally 100% safe so long as it stays in those boundaries. (That EU law is unjust and should be contested.)

    --
    Expert in software patents or patent law? Contribute to the ESP wiki!
  3. "legally play a Bluray" by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "legally play a Blueray" (same question for DVD)

    What exactly does that mean?

    A Blueray/DVD player that one may purchase at Best Buy also decrypts the disc. Is that circumvention also?

    What exactly is the difference between a commercial player and an open source player (which also must decrypt the disc)?

    The main difference that I see is that one is using the official specification, and one is using an unofficial specification.

    But using an unofficial specification is not illegal.

    Perhaps, If some are claiming that an open source player plays "BlueRay" or "DVD" discs, then that may be a Trademark violation, as it has not been certified.

    Is that what you are implying? a Trademark violation?