Slashdot Mirror


FBI Prioritizes Copyright Over Missing Persons

An anonymous reader writes "The FBI has limited resources, so it needs to prioritize what it works on. However, it's difficult to see why dealing with copyright infringement seems to get more attention than identity theft or missing persons. In the past year, the FBI has announced a special new task force to fight intellectual property infringement, but recent reports have shown that both identity theft and missing persons have been downgraded as priorities by the FBI, to the point that there are a backlog of such cases."

21 of 372 comments (clear)

  1. Elementary my dear Watson by countertrolling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The FBI exists to protect profits. In fact the government exists to protect commerce, the very basis of our society

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    1. Re:Elementary my dear Watson by Kepesk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I must disagree. Government exists to protect the people and the peoples' resources. It has been hijacked with legal bribes in order to protect commerce over the people. That's what we're seeing here.

    2. Re:Elementary my dear Watson by countertrolling · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Protecting "people" is purely an ancillary benefit, as they are more productive if they feel secure and content. The protection of commerce is hardly a recent phenomenon, that of commercial slave trade up until 1860 being a good example. Here again we see the government protecting the property owners above all else at that time also.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    3. Re:Elementary my dear Watson by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or, alternatively, missing people do not have a powerful lobby. Well, MIAs in Vietnam had one, but that's about it. It's a bit disturbing though to see how far corporate support goes in shaping priorities. Or the priorities of the American President. Obama's and Biden's hard-on for IP isn't helping.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    4. Re:Elementary my dear Watson by Moryath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Put another way:

      There's no money in solving actual crimes. On the other hand, doing the dirty work of the MafiAA is a way to collect some kick-ass bribes.

    5. Re:Elementary my dear Watson by GlitchCog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "MIAs in Vietnam had one" MIAs were exploited to demonize the Vietcong. If people don't hate communism, it's a very big threat to profits. There were guys missing in action in WWII also, but they didn't go on about how they were secretly still being held years after the war ended. They just said they were dead and moved on.

    6. Re:Elementary my dear Watson by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Vietnam MIA issue can be traced via http://www.amconmag.com/article/2010/jul/01/00010/ by Sydney Schanberg (two George Polk awards)
      Nixon pledged $3.25 billion in “postwar reconstruction” aid, congress did not seem to be interested in spending anymore.
      No aid, no POWs. France paid up after Dien Bien Phu.
      Every US gov seems not to want to admit they left them behind, so the cover up goes on. Better the fog of war than the reality of been left to rot.
      The FBI might face the same with missing persons. Start digging and they find slavery, cults, sweatshop, sex trade and the deep state and federal links that cover/protect year after year.
      Generation profit and evil.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:Elementary my dear Watson by marcello_dl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's the same government that let outsourcing happen. Why should they care about one industry and let entire sectors like manufacuring be lost?

      I tell you. Entertainment has the double role of propaganda (proposing models for our youth, so they think they're against the system by spraying paint on walls or paying to get brain and ear damage, and measuring art and success in terms of $$$), and the trojan horse to push for IP laws. Intellectual property is just the big guys excuse to transform the virtual world into a market: in a purely virtual world a startup can compete with estabilished giants. When IP laws shape it, though, being first and being bigger begins to offer an advantage again like scale economy and banks covering your ass do in the real world.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  2. Re:so that bigger then going after rapist in DNA l by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Their DNA lab is so backed up, they can't effectively pursue any violent criminals, so evil copyright violators are the low-hanging fruit.

    This is the "change" we voted for?

  3. Actually... by msauve · · Score: 5, Insightful
    property rights.

    Political power, then, I take to be a right of making laws with penalties of death, and consequently all less penalties, for the regulating and preserving of property, and of employing the force of the community, in the execution of such laws, and in the defence of the common-wealth from foreign injury; and all this only for the public good.

    --- John Locke, 2nd Treatise of Gov't vis-a-vis US Const, 5th and 14th Amendments.

    The argument then becomes whether ideas can be property. The US Constitution, by implication, says no - "Writings and Discoveries" are an "exclusive right" only for a "limited time," a clear statement that "intellectual property" is not property at all, but a limited and artificially constructed grant of rights.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  4. Re:The economy is in the tank by Nadaka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Every dollar not spent on bad movies and pop music is one more dollar that can be spent on productive industry.

  5. Re:Wrong by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your lips move but I can't hear what you're saying. Probably it's that chorus of nerd rage that the well-crafted headline and misleading summary invoked on demand.

  6. Re:so that bigger then going after rapist in DNA l by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How does finding rapists and prosecuting them help corporate profits and the economy at large? Women who are raped should just go home and take a shower and get over it, and get back to work so their employer doesn't suffer any loss of profit.

        (in case it wasn't obvious)

  7. Re:Wrong by cosm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    INCORRECT: The FBI is NOT prioritizing copyright over missing persons.

    CORRECT: The FBI has a backlog of missing person DNA to run in the DNA labs. The FBI is increasing the amount of manpower assigned to copyright.

    I don't know how much the FBI should spend at all on copyright, but it is a bit of a stretch to take the current facts and say that copyright is prioritized over missing persons.

    I would relabel that as "Unsubstantiated" and "Factual", for unless you can prove your former assertion, is too strong a labeling. They could be prioritizing copyright over missing persons like the summary implies, and though this is unsubstantiated quantitatively, it cannot blatantly be labelled "incorrect", unless somebody knows otherwise. [citation?]

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
  8. Re:Wrong by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    CORRECT:
    The FBI has a backlog of missing person DNA to run in the DNA labs.
    The FBI is increasing the amount of manpower assigned to copyright.

    If they have a big backlog in the DNA labs, but they're increasing the manpower assigned to copyright "crimes", then that looks to me like they're prioritizing copyright over missing persons. If missing persons were a higher priority, they would devote more resources to their backlogged DNA labs, so that they wouldn't be backlogged any more, and they wouldn't devote any more resources to copyright.

    So it looks like the summary is correct after all.

  9. Re:Wrong by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they're increasing the manpower for copyright crimes, that means they have money available in their budget to pay those people. Instead of hiring people for copyright, they could spend that money to hire people for DNA labs, or build more labs, buy more equipment to make the existing workers more efficient, etc.

    Are you really trying to claim that there's a glut of qualified workers for pursuing copyright cases, and there's zero available workers for DNA labs? Pursuing copyright cases isn't an unskilled job either.

  10. False Dichotomy by Skexis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The FBI does not exist to investigate one thing OR another. It investigates what crimes are capable of being solved by lab work and field agents who may or may not have any leads. Missing Persons and Identity Theft are two types of cases where the amount of time and money expended is often beyond the department's means to rectify the relative damages caused.

    In the case of missing persons, because some of them don't want to be found, or another department has already exhausted their leads.
    In the case of Identity Theft, because the perpetrators are often in other countries, where it doesn't make practical sense to send field agents to sift through hearsay or rumor in order to find someone who might be their criminal, and who, if he's smart at all, has since erased the evidence of his theft anyways.

  11. Re:Wrong by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps, but "more difficult" doesn't mean "impossible". All the money being spent on increasing staffing for copyright cases could be spent on DNA cases instead, even if the gain is small. The DNA cases are extremely important, and a valid use of taxpayer dollars, since one of government's jobs is to provide police services, which now includes investigative services and DNA analysis. Pursuing copyright cases is not important in the least, and is (or should be) a civil matter anyway. It doesn't require any investigation.

  12. self-citing on techdirt? by blueworm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does it seem to anybody else like Techdirt is actually just self-citing itself for its proof? I don't really see where it's shown that the FBI has copyright enforcement actually prioritized higher than missing persons here. I see references to people saying it's a major priority, but that doesn't actually mean it really is. I think we need some more evidence laid out a little more clearly than what Techdirt has done, at least.

  13. Re:so that bigger then going after rapist in DNA l by westlake · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How does finding rapists and prosecuting them help corporate profits and the economy at large?

    Rape is almost never prosecuted in the federal courts.

    It is extraordinarilly rare for any crime of violence to be prosecuted in the federal courts.

    What you are really asking for is a national forensic lab and a massive DNA database managed by the FBI.

  14. Re:so that bigger then going after rapist in DNA l by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Insightful

        People love blaming inherited problems on the person currently in power. Just watch Fox News. No, not for news, but to see how someone can spin anything to blame the wrong party, and then have die hard followers repeating the same garbage.

        I only include Fox News because they are one of many sources that do the same thing. The list of counterproductive spin doctors is far too long to list.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.