Slashdot Mirror


Quake Live Beta Ends, Optional Subscription Plans Added

An anonymous reader sends news that the beta tag has come off of id's Quake Live, and they've added two subscription plans to monetize the game. The announcement asserts early and often that the game's current "Standard" play options will remain free-to-play. The lower subscription tier gets extra maps, a new Freeze Tag game mode, and clan creation abilities, among other things, for $2 per month. The higher plan, which is twice as expensive, grants players those benefits plus the capability to create their own private servers.

9 of 100 comments (clear)

  1. All this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All this for a game that you could find the bargain bin for 10 dollars...3 years ago.

    1. Re:All this by FrostDust · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's the average user count of Q3A nowadays, vs. Quake Live?

      $10 once may be cheaper than (an optional) $4 a month, but what's the point when the population dries up? I know that people are still playing Q3A, but is it actively being developed or promoted?

    2. Re:All this by sideh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I agree with you, I see quakelive as a revival of the quake genre. Yes, qw/q2/q3 is still played but it's a nightmare getting all the patches required to play. All these new fangled "realistic" shooters drive me up the wall. QL makes it easy which opens up the game to a wider audience. I signed up for the "pro" package immediately just to support them, although one thing I will say is the servers all seem to be 6v6, which results in a massive spam fest. Hopefully they'll fix this. Incidentally, I was very impressed with the Linux version of the game. Installed and ran flawlessly in ubuntu 10.04 x86_64. Didn't even have to edit a config file :)

  2. mmmyea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Pretty sure I can do ALL of that with the copy I bought over a decade ago, and of course, I and many others did.

  3. Re:So silly. Just remake Quake 3 already! by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Quake 3 Arena is an awesome game that, in terms of sheer gameplay, still has no equal. If Id just re-made Quake 3 Arena with updated graphics, but the same gameplay, same customizability, same map-making and mod-ability, it would be a smash hit.

    They did, it's called Quake 4. But I agree, this Quake Live think looks like a completely terrible thing that shouldn't even exist, but sadly it gets many new players or returning old players. I mean, pay 2 bucks per month for Freeze Tag, that I've been playing on the regular Q3A for free since forever? I'm glad id has found a new cash cow to support Carmack's space hobby, but fuck this.

  4. Re:So silly. Just remake Quake 3 already! by RogueyWon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I disagree that a full-blown remake of Quake 3 would be a good commercial proposition. Remaking the game on fresh technology would be expensive; even with the current console generation (which defines the technical limits for most games, with a few rare exceptions like Crysis) edging up towards 5 years old, development costs remain far higher than they were when Quake 3 came out. The successful bits of the industry can absorb these costs because there are far more gamers than there were a decade ago. However, I think the appeal of a Quake 3 remake to most newer games is almost non-existent.

    Even at the time, despite the strong support it gets from part of the fanbase, Quake 3 perhaps had less impact as a game (as opposed to its engine, which powered umpteen other games over the next few years) than had been expected. With its multiplayer-only focus, its emphasis on the "pro-gamer" market and its lack of new ideas, it really marked the point where id lost their leadership in the fps market. It's not really age that killed the game off from the tournament scene, but rather the fact that the audience shrank relatively quickly. If age had been the factor, then Counter-Strike (which ran on technology long-since obsolete by the time of Quake 3's launch) wouldn't have outlasted it for so long. In the era of Quake and Quake 2, if you played fpses online, you basically played one of those two games or one of their mods. Quake 3 was never more than one competitor among many.

    Quake 4 achieved some reasonable sales success, but the fact that it vanished almost immediately from the mainstream online scene indicates that the singleplayer campaign was probably what most people bought it for. With the current online gaming scene dominated by Modern Warfare, Gears of War and Halo 3, it's pretty clear that tastes have moved away from the "bouncy deathmatch" model of the Quake series.

  5. Re:So silly. Just remake Quake 3 already! by kangsterizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Quake 4 shares very little with Q3A physics and gameplay, it just has the "so called similar weapons" but it's a different game.

    Quake Live is a modified Q3A but most of it is actually the same as Q3A, physics are tweaked but nearly the same, and so on

  6. how is quake live better again? by epyT-R · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. no unsanctioned user content
    2. no 3rd party independent servers.
    3. it's a stupid browser dll. why? just have the javascript call quake3.exe with the params...
    4. the stock q3 maps were not much to rave about. only a few were serviceable during q3's lifetime (q3dm6,q3dm7,q3dm13, q3dm16, and everyone lived q3dm17 for some reason). the rest were rarely if ever played. the meat and potatoes were the maps that came with the various large mod projects that came later.
    5. the rest of the 'premium' content is just the team arena maps. big deal. paying for map packs = lame bullshit.
    6. sure it has a 'community' but then so did q3. q3's community is/was far superior in many ways. many were active producers of content and the consumers played active roles in testing prereleases. many of them cared.. that makes a BIG difference in the intrinsic value of something like a game community. people paying subscriptions have a completely different attitude.
    7. no blood, censored language chat in game and in the forums.. really? since when was quake rated PG? the quake I remember was full of piss and vinegar and attitude, game and players both. that was its charm. pantywaists with thin skin need not apply.

    (if there are dupes to this post, I'm sorry, but slashdots' scripts are buggin out again).

    1. Re:how is quake live better again? by minasoko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1. no unsanctioned user content 2. no 3rd party independent servers. 3. it's a stupid browser dll. why? just have the javascript call quake3.exe with the params...

      It's a game delivered as a service. These restrictions are necessary to maintain a level of quality and consistency for all. This seems obvious to me and shouldn't really need to be pointed out.

      4. the stock q3 maps were not much to rave about. only a few were serviceable during q3's lifetime (q3dm6,q3dm7,q3dm13, q3dm16, and everyone lived q3dm17 for some reason). the rest were rarely if ever played. the meat and potatoes were the maps that came with the various large mod projects that came later.

      Agreed, there's no excuse for not developing many more new maps, or running a competition for the community to design them. They should be free for all to access, of course.

      5. the rest of the 'premium' content is just the team arena maps. big deal. paying for map packs = lame bullshit.

      Basically, id said that advertising alone cannot support the project, which was their original plan. It's a shame, but I expect the subscriptions will be needed to cover the bulk of running and development costs.

      To be fair, you're missing out:

      Private Servers

      Clan Support

      Stored stats

      By-pass ad messages

      6. sure it has a 'community' but then so did q3. q3's community is/was far superior in many ways. many were active producers of content and the consumers played active roles in testing prereleases. many of them cared.. that makes a BIG difference in the intrinsic value of something like a game community. people paying subscriptions have a completely different attitude.

      Q3A's community failed to maintain the interest of all but a small minority. QL is an attempt to broaden the audience and the tier system is designed to allow new players to enter the community without being destroyed by the old-timers. This is what killed Q3A, as it got to the point where the barrier for entry was impossibly high and the only players were the hardcore elite.

      7. no blood, censored language chat in game and in the forums.. really? since when was quake rated PG? the quake I remember was full of piss and vinegar and attitude, game and players both. that was its charm. pantywaists with thin skin need not apply.

      (if there are dupes to this post, I'm sorry, but slashdots' scripts are buggin out again).

      Come on, do these things honestly bother you that much? My guess is that certain companies are not interested in having their products associated with ultraviolence and childish swearing. These changes mean more potential ad revenue, lowering the subscription price.

      If id somehow made it impossible for people to continue playing Q3A, then you'd have an argument. As it stands, I can't see what the problem is.