Slashdot Mirror


Is a US High-Speed Railway Economically Feasible?

An anonymous reader writes "The federal government has committed at least $8-billion (and counting) for the development of a nationwide high-speed intercity passenger railway system in almost three-dozen states. Rail advocates have long dreamed of an extensive railway grid that will provide clean, speedy, energy-efficient travel. The high-speed rail program is also expected to create thousands of desperately needed jobs, while reducing the nation's dependence on foreign oil and easing gridlocked highways and congested air-space. However, this noble, ambitious, multi-year plan faces a multitude of obstacles — including costs that will no doubt escalate as the years pass by; and an American public that may be reluctant to relinquish the independence and convenience of their beloved automobiles for a train."

3 of 1,139 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Don't target cars by dAzED1 · · Score: 1, Troll

    are they highspeed rails? Nope. So, irrelevant, really.

  2. Won't work by xnpu · · Score: 1, Troll

    As a European living in China, two places with extensive train networks, I tell you: it will not work. Trains are not as convenient or cheap as you may think. I don't know of any country that has a fully profitable train system - they are all subsidized because nobody is willing to pay the real price of a train ticket. Mind you, that's in European countries where gas is already much more expensive than US. Simply cranking up the gas price a little to force a few folks into the train won't cut it. The real deal with train is this: they are supposedly "greener". This means that if you are against them you are, supposedly, against a better world. On the back of this guilt-trip, the people will be asked to pay for the new trains, some people will be asked to relocate, others will be asked to suffer the noise of a train. All with really just one goal in mind: providing new infrastructure (at your expense) for the GOODS transportation industry. They're the only guys who are going to profit.

  3. Re:Alternate solution by benjamindees · · Score: 1, Troll

    If gas taxes promote "efficient living", then surely outlawing combustion altogether would promote even more efficient living?

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"