Slashdot Mirror


Sandisk Debuts World's Smallest SSD Yet

siliconbits writes "Weighing less than a paper clip and smaller than a postage stamp, Sandisk's iSSD comes in a tiny Ball Grid Array and boasts support for the SATA standard, which means that it can be soldered directly on motherboards."

4 of 222 comments (clear)

  1. Summary++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The whole article is just about 5 times longer than the very short summary. I didn't read it very attentively, but the following 2 quotes should be informative and reading them, I think you won't need to spend the 30 seconds it would take to read the full article:

    "160MB/sec sequential read and 100MB/sec sequential write speeds being quoted."

    "will target the "fast-growing" mobile computing platforms such as tablet PCs and ultra-thin notebooks (and netbooks we presume); as expected, they won't be available to consumers directly but as an integral part of devices."

  2. Re:That's a great idea! by v1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    heh, I hadn't even considered that, excellent counterpoint.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  3. different from microSD? by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Informative

    How is this much different from a MicroSD?

    --Smaller than stamp? Very much so, Check!
    --4gb to 64gb? Check!
    --100MB/sec read and 160MB/sec write? Hmm... well not by itself, but if you Raid 0 a few MicroSDs it'd probably reach those speeds, and we're hoping the article is correct with the MB term meaning Megabyte and not Megabit because MicroSD's also offer 100 Mbit/s

    So while this is announcement is nice, I still feel like they took the same thing we've been using for the past few years, put it in a new box and labeled it as a totally new product.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:different from microSD? by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      1: MicroSD only goes up to 32GB, and is actually the limit of MicroSDHC. The standard to go above that (expected to be MicroSDXC, based on SDXC) is yet to exist.
      2: The MicroSD interface is limited to 100Mb/s, so the 160Mb/s couldn't be had from MicroSD at all

      Other than that, yeah, it's just the same data chip as they probably already had but with a sata device-side chip integrated.