Slashdot Mirror
Marijuana Growers Use Wild Bears to Guard Pot
Two Canadian marijuana growers were using at least 14 wild black bears to guard their crops. The pair had lured the bears onto their property with dog food in an attempt to deter thieves. Fortunately for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police pot bears turn out to be pretty chill. "They were tame, they just sat around watching... at one point one of the bears climbed onto the hood of a police car, sat there for a bit and then jumped off," said
RCMP Sergeant Fred Mansveld.
The bear that climbed onto the hood of a police car was waiting for the bag of Cheetos. A bag never showed up so he jumped off.
This is no ordinary pic-a-nic basket!
"Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
So, a few guys are just growing pot, smoking and selling all day, they take animals for their protection, the animals are treated well, they are well fed, and neither the animals nor the people are a danger to anyone.
So, the cops come in, put the guys in jail, burn the crops, and murder the animals. And we are somehow supposed to think that the cops are the good guys?
WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
What better guards could you have than Grizzly bears with the munchies?
at one point one of the bears climbed onto the hood of a police car,
I thought that the Mounties ride around on horses, and not in police cars?
TFA fails to mention if the bear took a dump on the police car. Being that the bears were doomed to being shot, that's probably what I would have done. That must kinda really suck to be a bear: "Ok, these pinky creatures are feeding me crap out of cans, that they would never fathom to eat themselves, I am being gentle with them. And then the cops show up and shoot me.
Although, the last time that I was in Banff, Canada, our travel guide reminded us on how to deal with the wild critters:
"A moose in the rut is no Bambi. It's a bad-assed mother-fucker, who didn't get laid, and has a set of horns with your name on it."
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
Many years ago I worked on a forestry bridge crew. The camp cook made 6 or 8 pies a day. There were only 4 of us on the crew. He would put all the extra food in 5 gal buckets to feed his bears.
One day his favorite old black bear got in a big fight with a 4 or 5 year old Grizzly. Old Irish waded into the battle with a broom to break it up. Irish got a couple broken ribs from his fav bear.
Now if the FishCops had a guy like Irish working for them, he would build a trail of pies deeper and deeper into the bush to save those bears. But not so with the highly educated game wardens of today; their answer is to shoot them. Anything that takes away from their budget for jetboats atv's and the latest fancy truck is dealt with that way.
A similar story (from 5 or 6 years back) was the killing of 8 or 10 Moose (some with calfs) that wandered into town during a winter with more than usual snow. A couple cowboys with ropes and a large pen with a few bails would have saved those animals but NO a bullet is better and the FishCops know "best". That year a bullet ended up in a balcony after it passed through or missed the moose. They then started shooting them with marbles until they got the poor animal in a less public place to kill them. Most of these university trained biology students are afraid of wildlife. These guys and gals are chicken shit, scared what ever you want to call them. Protectors of wildlife they are not.
This issue is bound to be made in to a reality show. So beware FC's you will be demonized if you kill all these animals.
Maybe get a couple of those bear dogs to put the run on them if you can't find a pie man to lead them away to safety. Wildlife officials don't care about the wildlife if their answers are always Shoot Shoot.
My trapper friends would do a better job. They released cougar and wolf from their snares by putting a blanket over them then slipping their hand under to cut the cord with snips. These guys are brave. The cougar was a protected species and the wolf had hair rubbed off its back and was worthless. Boo FishCops boo.
Challenge: I have better access to my Video, Music, Pics and Text than anyone on Earth.
Boo FishCops boo.
Reading your post was like reading A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man in reverse.
I.e. your circumstantial, incomplete “study” of wildlife is more valid than the decades of study which has built up the theory that once a bear knows that humans have food, it tends to become more aggressive in seeking out humans so it can get fed, which is not a good thing because no matter how tame they’ve become wild bears still don’t mix very nicely with humans. Plus the tamer they become the worse they mix with other wild bears.
Thumbs-up for your excellent idea, though. A trail of pies leading into the woods. Yup, that’s bound to work. Not to mention that bears can smell food from miles away... stellar job, sir.
Legalize it and raise your own trade sanctions!
/. -- the Free Republic of technology.
You do know that the story didn't make any mention of them killing the bears, right? Just a note saying that people who feed bears make things worse for the bears, since then they're more willing to come into human areas and then get labeled a nuisance, in which case they then kill them.
There's no evidence the pot-grower's bears were harmed.
From the article
While they don't specifically say they killed the bears. That is clearly implied. The bears have been tamed, and thus now would be a safety risk, without they're pot growing owners to feed them anymore. It's possible they may be ok, but the whole death sentence quote leads me to believe otherwise.
America's Drug War is a criminal enterprise that only makes any drug problems worse. But that's not because cocaine is "a great resource" to an except drug gangs and a very few doctors/researchers. Cocaine is "tolerated" in countries whose part of the global Drug War scam is to produce drugs, so their bigshot drug ganglords protect the local circulation.
Cocaine is toxic, highly addictive, and causes all kinds of major health problems. Not just damaging brain tissue, livers, kidneys, hearts, vascular systems and other major organs on a large scale, but causing acute psychosis both in the short term and chronically.
Cocaine abuse is a major public health problem, even if the Drug War response makes the problems worse instead of fixing them. Sure, some people could use cocaine a little without abusing it, but very few do. Cocaine addiction reduces people to hurting friends, family an strangers alike, not just through violence and theft to support the high prices, but in abberant behavior directly caused by the drug. Cocaine is worse than alcohol, which is itself a dangerous toxin that causes a lot more harm that we should tolerate.
None of this justifies the Drug War. People with drug problems need medical help, usually psychological or social therapy to fix the underlying problem leading them to abuse the drugs. But that doesn't mean a dangerous drug like cocaine should be merely "tolerated" as a dangerous resource. It should be available only to adults from licensed dealers, and prohibited to anyone in a central registry checked at purchase time and generated by doctors or judges. Anyone attempting a second time to buy after being rejected once for being blacklisted should be required to attend counseling to determine why they're backsliding.
Cocaine and other addictive drugs that make people aggressive must be controlled by the state. Because its effects damage or destroy the user's natural ability to self control. Some people can handle it, but the system has to deal with those who can't. A rational system like what I describe would protect those of us who can deal with it, but also protect us from those who can't.
--
make install -not war
You are showing your ignorance here...Do you know the range of a bear? Even if you do take him 500+ mles away, he will only find the next human to look for a pie. I hope it's not your sweet little daughter sitting on the porch of your home away from home that has the pie. Or the scout group on their first camping trip and practicing their backwoods cooking skills. You have no idea what you are talking about here or the scope of of the situation.
If that's the way you deal with animals why not kill them all? You've clearly demonstrated that bears have no reason to exist in a human world and deserve extinction.
Just like ancient Rome, the USA has a far-too-big army that has to be kept busy. So they will bully and keep on bullying, because they need to do so. And therefore they bully even international justice, their own allies, the world-wide environment, well, basically anything.
Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!