How Statistics Can Foul the Meaning of DNA Evidence

Posted by timothy on Thursday August 19, 2010 @08:43AM from the persecution-rests dept.

azoblue writes with a piece in New Scientist that might make you rethink the concept of "statistical certainty." As the article puts it, "even when analysts agree that someone could be a match for a piece of DNA evidence, the statistical weight assigned to that match can vary enormously, even by orders of magnitude." Azoblue writes: "For instance, in one man's trial the DNA evidence statistic ranged from 1/95,000 to 1/13, depending on the different weighing methods used by the defense and the prosecution."

2 of 215 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Here's a tip: DON'T GET ARRESTED !! by Anonymous Coward · 2010-08-19 08:59 · Score: 0, Flamebait

If you are arrested, statistically YOU FUCKING DID THE CRIME !! Don't do the crime if you can't do the time: DON'T DO IT !!
And for all you fucking lip readers out there:
D.O.N.'.T. D.O. I.T. !.!.
Re:Numbers don't lie. by Beelzebud · 2010-08-19 09:25 · Score: 0, Flamebait

Are you actually that dense?