Google Patches 10 Chrome Bugs, Pays Out $10K
CWmike writes "Google patched 10 vulnerabilities in Chrome on Thursday, but it didn't award any of the researchers who reported bugs its new top-dollar reward. Google divulged no details of the vulnerabilities and, as is its custom, it blocked public access to its bug-tracking database — a practice meant to keep attackers from using the information before most users have upgraded. Some rivals, such as Mozilla, do the same; others, like Microsoft, do not. Sergey Glazunov banked $4,674 for reporting four bugs, including the previous maximum $1,337 each for two of the quartet. A researcher known as 'kuzzcc,' who has also reported flaws in Opera to that browser's Norwegian maker, took home $2,000 for uncovering a pair of Chrome vulnerabilities. But no one received Google's new biggest bounty, which the company set at $3,133.70 last month, after Mozilla had increased its maximum vulnerability payment to $3,000."
", which the company set at $3,133.70 last month" Great, Easter eggs beyond the code.
Meritocracy at work. It's nice to see, and I'm sure I will hear all sorts of complaints about how it is neither fair nor effective.
Getting paid to help is always good. Especially on things many of us try to help on even if there is not pay incentive.
Home of The Suki Series
you would think you could sell this information to certain other parties for a lot more than that
and the potential for damage that can be done to the company's brand, and with all of the money the company has, you'd think they'd pay at least an order of magnitude more. and get a lot more interest in finding and reporting security flaws to boot
they are playing pennies for gems of information
Some of us like to play nice. Not saying I am in the category of the people who got those rewards, of course.
Home of The Suki Series
It has to be a careful balance to set bounties like this at the right amount. The information and fixes are valuable, yes. However, If they set the payout too high, it could actually encourage their employees to write buggy software in the hopes of cashing in (i.e. through a friend or family member).
Alphanos
Yeah, but Google is reputable, you -know- that their $3K is going to be genuine. Good luck suing J. Random Blackhat when the money he pays you turns out to be stolen/fraudulent or never arrives.
Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.