Slashdot Mirror


Halo Reach Leaked To Filesharing Sites

Stoobalou writes "What appears to be the full version of Bungie's Halo Reach game has turned up on a number of file sharing sites. The hotly-anticipated multi-player shooter had been hosted on a private area of the Microsoft Live site in order for journalists to preview the release, but Microsoft has admitted that a security breach has meant that pirates have been able to bypass personal download codes given to writers. Disk images of the game are now appearing on a number of public torrent and P2P sites as well as on popular NZB aggregators and Usenet binaries newsgroups." The game isn't due to be released until September 14th. Microsoft is said to be "aggressively pursuing" whoever grabbed the files without their permission.

23 of 160 comments (clear)

  1. Long end of the stick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "What appears to be the full version of Bungie's Halo Reach game has turned up on a number of file sharing sites. The hotly-anticipated multi-player shooter had been hosted on a private area of the Microsoft Live site in order for journalists to preview the release, but Microsoft has admitted that a security breach has meant that pirates have been able to bypass personal download codes given to writers. Disk images of the game are now appearing on a number of public torrent and P2P sites as well as on popular NZB aggregators and Usenet binaries newsgroups."

    Whew! I'm sure glad we lengthened copyright to prevent something like this.

    1. Re:Long end of the stick. by miggyb · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clearly we now need copyright to extend backwards into the past, before the work is completely finished. Otherwise, how are artists like Da Vinci supposed to protect unfinished works like the Mona Lisa?

      --
      This signature serves no purpose other than to help you see which posts were made by me.
  2. Better go after those pirates by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're stealing potential profit! It's almost as bad as competition between businesses, or a consumer informing other consumers about a bad company/poorly made product. In all three cases, potential profit is being stolen.

    We must stop these people from hurting our businesses. Also, this clearly wouldn't have happened if there had been super powerful DRM installed with the game!

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    1. Re:Better go after those pirates by gmhowell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Holy shit! People don't drop as many $50 bills on frivolous entertainment in a down economy? That's just crazy talk!

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:Better go after those pirates by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What? I hate piracy, my friend. Those thieves steal from future versions of the author/business that created the product. But, really, how can you not see how competition between businesses is stealing potential profit? When someone goes to one business to buy a product instead of going to another business, the first business is stealing from the other business because the other business could have had more profit (remember, future profit is being stolen) if the person went to their business to buy the product, instead.

      Also, I'm sure glad that you agree with my point of view about piracy being evil, instead of thinking I was being sarcastic and then simply bashing my argument without even commenting on what was logically wrong with it. Good thing you didn't do that.

      We have to stop these injustices, my friend. After all, copying something is stealing because it steals non-existent profit from the developer (the future version of the developer), just like businesses steal non-existent profit from each other when they compete. We can't allow this to happen. Something must be done.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    3. Re:Better go after those pirates by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 2, Funny

      What are you talking about, friend? You're the one being thick. You support the theft of non-existent (future) profit by supporting competition. You might as well support piracy. Some businesses think they have the right to steal customers (thereby likely stealing future profit away from other businesses) away from other businesses. This is absurd. You should do your part to help stop the theft of future profits.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  3. Does this mean... by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can redeem my Gamestop super exclusive unlocked shiny armor of orgasmic distraction early too?

    I despise software that is deliberately broken. If publishers want to make some extra sales by rewarding preorders I'm fine with it, but after a few months the items should be available to everyone. I paid for the thing, I should not be prevented from using all of the features.

    --
    Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
  4. 'aggressive' waste of time by postmortem · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless they cut power to all XBOX owners, I don't see how you can stop known leak on internet in 2010. Better spend money and resources elsewhere. Release it few weeks earlier?

    1. Re:'aggressive' waste of time by d3ac0n · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, if you RTFA, the attackers used a vulnerability in the website hosting the code to break in and BYPASS the journalist login feature. So technically, no reporters are gonna get sued since none of them did anything wrong.

      Let's be honest, the real problem here was that MS was using the "Security by Obscurity" model to hide the test code site. It even says ITA that it was a "secret" website. (As if a website could EVER be secret for long, especially one connected to Microsoft.) The fact that anyone at MS still thinks that security by obscurity is wise reveals that despite all of the improvements in Win7, There is an ingrained culture in MS that still doesn't get it.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    2. Re:'aggressive' waste of time by cc1984_ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's be honest, the real problem here was that MS was using the "Security by Obscurity" model to hide the test code site. It even says ITA that it was a "secret" website. (As if a website could EVER be secret for long, especially one connected to Microsoft.)

      Secret websites are nothing special. The only thing that Microsoft forgot to do is create a robots.txt file

      User-agent: *
      Disallow: /SecretDownloads/Halo-Reach-Prerelease.zip

      That way it wouldn't have shown up on Google and nobody would have downloaded it. Problem solved.

    3. Re:'aggressive' waste of time by HungryHobo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that's why reading the robots.txt files for sites can sometimes be fun.

  5. Only for specific Xbox360 mod by JorDan+Clock · · Score: 2, Informative

    The version leaked is only useable for those with a specific kind of Xbox 360 mod, namely a JTAG mod. Basically, they aren't going to be playing on Xbox Live with this game or they'll kind their Xbox banned (and possibly Live account along with it). This is not a version that can be burned to a disc and played with a DVD-ROM modded 360, which is the most common mod and has a low detection rate.

    1. Re:Only for specific Xbox360 mod by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pirating Reach is a bit of a stretch, then.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  6. Misleading headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Halo: Reach was actually leaked onto store shelves in the year 2001 for the original Xbox.

    Halo: Reach is the short version of the longer title, Halo: Reach for another game.

  7. JTAGED by st1rguy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't think this will hurt MS much , a JTAG mod is out of hacker skill range of most Xbox gamers. http://www.instructables.com/id/How-to-JTAG-your-Xbox-360-and-run-homebrew/

  8. HALO BREACH !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Get it, breach instead of reach? Yes?

  9. Re:low detection rate? by NoZart · · Score: 5, Interesting

    >>> Can anyone explain why you need a JTAG mode to play this game?

    Because the game was released as an unencrypted download title. This way, you can not generate a working ISO to burn from it, as you don't know which way to encrypt it to match the release discs.

    >>> JTAG mode allows you to unban your console (by changing the ID)

    Yeah, but you need an existing keyvault from an unbanned XBox to do that, so this method is highly impractical.
    The workaround for JTAGs to use this leak is more along the lines playing the games over Xlink Kai, a LAN-tunneling service, which will provide a crappy gameplay experience. /Tinfoil hat on/
    The way this was leaked (only works on JTAGs which are few and gimped multiplayer and MP is the main draw of the game) makes me think that it is possible this is intentional. All the Youtube clips showing ingame details work perfectly as some sort of guerilla marketing to amp up the hype. /Tinfoil hat off/

  10. Well, this just proves it! by billsayswow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is why everyone releases games for the console these days. Everyone pirates PC games, but no one can pirate for the consoles...

    1. Re:Well, this just proves it! by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Funny

      but no one can pirate for the consoles...

      You ignorant or blind?

      Understanding sarcasm is soooo overrated.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:Well, this just proves it! by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A PC doesn't have to be modded to work with pirate software, a console generally does. This alone ensures that piracy will never be even remotely as prevalent on consoles as it is on PC's.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  11. Come after me, Microsoft... by Khyber · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are you mad you failed to secure your permissions for downloaded files?

    You only have yourself to blame. I only showed people how to bypass your bullshit, just like I showed the nice people at OZMODS how to bypass the PS3 protections.

    Please, come after me. I'll fucking wipe out your life and livelihood when I expose your internal e-mails showing how you PLANNED this out. We're talking a SECOND anti-trust lawsuit with full exposure this time, assholes. FUCKING TEST ME.

    I *LOVE* having spies in industry. Your NDA be damned. I'll expose you for the Totalitarian Communists that you are and make your stock price plummet so hard you'll fucking wish you didn't come after me.

    I owned EA, you think you stand any better chance?

    Bring, it, Microsoft. You already know who I am, please, step up so I can wipe your ass out and claim self-defense from INTERNATIONAL TRAITORS SELLING TECHNOLOGY TO FORBIDDEN COUNTRIES.

    You don't stand a chance.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Come after me, Microsoft... by TheJokeExplainer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Uh. I am at a real loss on how to explain this.

      -Joke Explainer

      --
      visit my pal the xkcd explainer!
    2. Re:Come after me, Microsoft... by TheCarAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, it's like a... when you roll down the windows and....

      I Got nothin

      ~TheCarAnalogyGuy