Slashdot Mirror


FCC Fights To Maintain Indecency Policy

GovTechGuy writes "The FCC filed Thursday to appeal a recent court decision that struck down its policy of fining broadcasters for profanity or nudity shown on live television. The FCC's brief argues the court ruling would make it almost impossible to punish broadcasters that show nudity or profanity during hours when children are likely to be watching or listening."

14 of 602 comments (clear)

  1. do you know what happens if a kid sees a boob? by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    their minds are scarred and they are ruined for life, they enter a death spiral of drug use and prostitution. all it takes is one glance of a boob, and the fate of your child's life will change on the spot to one of apathy, laziness, fatalism, and moribund lack of emotional affect

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:do you know what happens if a kid sees a boob? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dear lord! What are we doing to our infants by breastfeeding them!?!

  2. Re:Le sigh by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, but without the FCC, I might have to actually pay attention to what my kids are watching myself. Can't the FCC just screen the babysitter for me, while I take a nap?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. Re:Fucking backwards by ciderbrew · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've no problem with his cock on your TV?!?

  4. it's unnatural, that's what that is by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Funny

    the idea of bringing a boob to an innocent baby's mouth is obviously a severe injection of immorality into the family structure by people who have no consideration for a child's decency and psychological health. some people are just perverts, but why they can't do their perversions amongst themselves, why they have to drag an innocent darling child into their sleazy use of the human body by making a helpless infant suck on a boob... it really makes my blood boil at these decadent slime

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  5. Re:Le sigh by Pojut · · Score: 1, Funny

    OH SHIT!!!

    wait....

  6. a breast is not made for babies! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Funny

    get it into your sleazy perverted minds you immoral cretins: breasts were not made to be exposed to innocent babies!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  7. Re:Fucking backwards by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nobody wants to see a cock on their TV.

    I beg to differ, Fox News has high ratings and that channel has a Lot of Complete Cocks on it.

    Then we also have every public Show that has Tom Cruise and Mel Gibson...

    It seems that Americans like seeing Cocks on TV.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  8. i've heard rumors by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Funny

    that, on first meeting their innocent babies, some mothers actually bring their babies into close contact with their nasty sexual organs

    what is wrong with these immoral perverts?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  9. Re:Forget the FCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    We were watching the Super Bowl with our kids. And out popped Janet's nipple. Live, and unexpected. Parents who wanted to be "responsible" in preventing their children from seeing such things were caught totally by surprise. I think my kids will be OK, but it kinda puts a dent in that argument.

    A responsible parent would have leaped up from the couch at that moment screaming "THAT VULGAR CUNT," whilst backhanding his wife.

  10. yeah! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Funny

    who gave these walking incubators the right to vote!

    {and here is where obvious parody dangerously approaches the reality of some people's thoughts, and so must be noted as parody}

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  11. Re:Forget the FCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    For me and my kids, it wan't so much the initial live moment, as when I rewound the tivo, and moved frame by frame, then paused it. It really messed up the kids. Damn you, CBS! Think of the children!

  12. Re:Le sigh by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2, Funny

    The thing that gets me is the word "shit". Everyone says this word including fairly young children.
    It's just goofy to ban it. It's a bodily function.

    Think about the roots of our 'curse' words. They share a common denominator (for the most part), Germanic origins.

    There has been a huge push by the 'enlightened' to view the latin (and tangentially, French) origins as 'pure' and the german origins as 'impure'. It's the same reason that a taboo was created with regard to ending sentences with prepositions, it was something not done in latin, but due to the germanic structure of English, some sentences do sound and appear better when ended with a preposition. We aren't speaking Latin (or French), so a lot of the rules are just appeals to tradition. A tradition started as a mild cultural cleansing.

    But back on point, look at the 'curse' words and their entymological origins. It is very eye opening to see how a push for cleansing a culture became a social taboo.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  13. Re:Fucking backwards by budgenator · · Score: 4, Funny

    If Gibson is a cock, then Cruise would be more like a penile sheath; Gibson can be crazy on his own, but Cruise seems to need a supporting crew of loonies.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds