Slashdot Mirror


PR Firm Settles With FTC On Fake Game Reviews

eldavojohn writes "So, you pay a PR firm like Reverb to generate some positive buzz for your new mobile game, and what do they do? Hire employees to post fake glowing reviews of your game wherever it's being distributed. The FTC says that's not okay due to regulations enacted last year requiring that paid reviews disclose they are paid reviews. Originally, the fear was that this regulation would target the small-time blogger, but this news of Reverb settling with the FTC over fake game reviews shows that the FTC is also targeting big PR firms. They said, 'We hope that this case will show advertisers that they have to be transparent in their practices and help guide other ad agencies.' The article says fake reviews like those alleged in the complaint (PDF) are pretty much the norm on iTunes. Reverb denies that this settlement is any acknowledgment of wrongdoing; rather, just a timesaver over a costly court battle. Will the FTC continue to make examples of big PR firms? Wait and see."

12 of 105 comments (clear)

  1. Not just iTunes and games... by GuidedByVoices · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These fake reviews are common for businesses as well. Take a look at restaurants on Yelp sometime; many "boost" their review status by posting fakes. How is the FTC actually able to deduce which are from a firm and which are legit anyway?

    --
    idioelectric - Electric per se, or containing electricity in its natural state.
    1. Re:Not just iTunes and games... by idontgno · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, if we're talking about game reviews, I think a safe assumption is that if it's glowingly positive, it's fake.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Not just iTunes and games... by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I bought the new iPad, and it made my penis grow 2 inches longer! True story!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:Not just iTunes and games... by T+Murphy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The most obvious ones are where the section to list cons is just used to say more good things ("I have a hard time putting it down!").

    4. Re:Not just iTunes and games... by dmonney · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yelp was recently sued for extortion for modding down those who didn't pay though. Maybe that's what we are missing. We need to pay Apple!, oh wait that's already done by them making a "featured" secion.

      --
      --Accept it, I'm a programmer and don't use spellcheck. As long as I spell things wrong consistently my programs work fi
    5. Re:Not just iTunes and games... by SailorSpork · · Score: 3, Funny

      I bought the new iPad, and it made my penis fall off! True story!

      Fixed that for ya... per FTC compliance.

    6. Re:Not just iTunes and games... by dubbreak · · Score: 4, Funny

      I bought the new iPad, and it made my penis grow 2 inches longer! True story!

      It's called an erection.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
  2. Re:Wait... by butterflysrage · · Score: 3, Insightful

    volume... can you create hundreds, make sure none get taken down, repost the ones that do... day in and day out AND get your next game made?

    --
    the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
  3. Re:Wait... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Correctumundo!

    Why do people assume that just because something is free and trivial that you wouldn't pay someone to do it? Time is money, and its up to you to decide whether the money you save for posting your own fake reviews is worth the money you could be making doing something else - and whether the fake reviews are worth the money of paying someone else.

    I mean - I'll give the neighbourhood kid 10 bucks to mow my lawn, even though I have a lawn mower and could easily do it on a Saturday afternoon.

  4. If I were kind of the judicial system by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would make it illegal to settle a lawsuit without admitting wrongdoing.

    If you're innocent, then it's wrong for the plaintiff to get a dime from you. And if you're liable, then the results of discovery should be available to any other would-be plaintiff.

    Settlements basically set up a shakedown system.

  5. Re:Business as usual by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not all bad, you just need to ignore both

    a) Big-name publications. As you say, they're pretty much factories which output wonderful reviews for the sake of early-access and other perks.

    b) Individual commenters and nobodies with blogs. They're either paid shills or, more commonly, frothing fanboys who don't meet any standards of objectivity.

    There are reliable sources, though, when you look outside of these categories. Sites like Ars Technica are pretty good, although since gaming is just one of several things they do, there's never any guarantee that they'll review the game you're interested in. Penny Arcade is of course the gold standard: Tycho (or Jerry, or whatever) is a great writer, and you can be damn sure that if he gives a game a thumbs-up, he's not doing it as a favor to some PR man. As long as you stick to established good sources you don't have to worry about scams like this.

    --
    Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
  6. Re:Business as usual by cgenman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I feel like there is a quality scale in gaming, and a tickle-your-fancy factor. Borderlands is a reasonable quality game, but it never quite tickled my fancy. Some reviews were strongly positive (decent quality, very much of interest to the reviewer), while others just went "meh" (decent quality, not of interest to the reviewer). By comparison, I loved that terrible Burger King Pocket Bike Racer game. It wasn't amazing or terrible, but it happened to strike a sweet spot in my personal brain between a love of bikes, a love of kart racers, and a love of really, really short racing games. Similarly, I'm a fan of DeathSmiles. It is of moderate to high quality. But the appeal is on a razor edge of gothic bullet hell players. No matter the quality level, I can't think of a single friend that would enjoy playing the game.

    I find it's most useful to skim the reviews to get a sense for the overall build quality of the game. And if the soul of the game also genuinely appeals, go for it.

    Full disclosure: I work in gaming.