Slashdot Mirror


Nanoresonators Create Ultra-High-Res Displays

TuurlijkNiet writes with this excerpt from Linux for Devices: "Eat your heart out, 'Retina display.' A new technology unveiled yesterday will allow creating pixels eight times smaller than the ones on Apple's iPhone 4, eliminate the need for polarizer layers, and allow screens to make much more efficient use of available light, say University of Michigan researchers. ... The pixels in the nanoresonator displays are about ten times smaller than those on a typical computer screen, and about eight times smaller than the pixels on the iPhone 4, which are about 78 microns, according to Guo. Such pixel densities could make the technology useful in projection displays, as well as wearable, bendable or extremely compact displays, according to the researchers."

11 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Bendable displays by Pojut · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The implications of a bendable display are huge, but I think something people don't address enough is durability. I don't mean "this display can be rolled up in a pringles can and still function!", I mean from a puncture and general jostling around perspective. People expect these displays to be paper thin...but what kind of material are these displays being sandwiched in between to ensure that they stay safe?

  2. Re:cool by Pojut · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now that they can make pixels so small that they can only be singled out from distances closer than my eyes can focus

    You answered your own question. Lay them down on transparent material, put that on a pair of glasses, and Bob's your uncle.

  3. Re:cool by leromarinvit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now that they can make pixels so small that they can only be singled out from distances closer than my eyes can focus, they can finally put some effort into making.. i got nothing, i don't see the point of this.

    How about sharp and non-jagged fonts? It removes the need for anti-aliasing, since your vision acts as the low-pass filter now.

    --
    Proud member of the Ferengi Socialist Party.
  4. Manufacturability? Cost? by CityZen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a feeling we won't be seeing this in consumer products any time soon.

  5. Re:cool by sznupi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Contact lenses with integrated display. I'm overdue with augmenting myself already...

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  6. Could be good... by Angst+Badger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...if it means that we'll start getting computer monitors with higher resolutions again instead of repurposed HDTV screens.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:Could be good... by cynyr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      how about just 17" 4k2k monitors... or even a 17" 1080p...

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
  7. Re:cool by azmodean+1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, for a display on its own, it's not terribly useful. After all, increase the pixel density beyond the iPhone 4 and you'll be adding useless pixels that take memory (framebuffer), power (all those pixels require controllers behind them, plus your 2D and 3D accellerators have to push that many more pixels) and size (enlarged bitmaps and the like take more space).

    What part of "iPhone 4 has resolution that matches the resolution of the human eye when held at arm's length" did you miss? I'm guessing the part in bold. I for one would absolutely love to have a pair of glasses that met or exceeded the resolution my eyes could perceive. And frankly, even if the display is "wasting pixels" in a given scenario, the obvious solution is to cut back on processing somehow, perhaps by lowering the resolution of image rendering to what is needed instead of the native resolution of the display. Sure the device will need beefier hardware for the situations where it actually needs to render at native resolution, but nothing is forcing the system to actually use all of those resources at all times.

  8. So would a high res display be good for by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    multiple resolutions? I mean Suppose you had a screen that had a huge resolution. (IE in the millions.) Then if you wanted to do say some standard resolutions like 1280X1024 or 800X600 you could just pick some nice multiple of either of those figures and used most of the screen. (You might have to leave a few lines of pixels off the bottom and right if the screen wasn't an even multiple but if the pixels where extremely small this wouldn't be a problem.) Wouldn't that make the math very quick and easy? (IE if all you had to do is convert your square pixel an resolution X to say a 5X5 square made out of smaller pixels.)

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
  9. Re:cool by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm against getting sucked into commercial advertising, but after the old spice phenomenom, I've given it some serious thought and decided that I don't mind being sucked in when the advertising has that ... Je ne sais quoi... It's not going to happen often by it's own virtue, and that company that can come up with it can have my business, or at least "have me as a tool" to forward their advertising (still never bought any old spice products, and don't plan to)
    I wish every advertiserment I happened accross had the same 'Je ne sais quoi' of awesomness.

    --
    "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
  10. 300 DPI Displays by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about we get some freakin affordable high DPI 20+ inch displays to work on? Display dpi has been stuck at 100 or less for...decades? And now that the IT industry things that pc users really just want 1080p for video we go backwards.