Slashdot Mirror


Pentagon Selects Companies To Build Flying Humvees

longacre sends in a quote from Popular Mechanics: "The Pentagon's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has selected two companies to proceed with the next stage of its Transformer, known as TX — a fully automated four-person vehicle that can drive like a car and then take off and fly like an aircraft to avoid roadside bombs. Lockheed Martin and AAI Corp., a unit of Textron Systems, are currently in negotiations with DARPA for the first stage of the Transformer project, several industry sources told Popular Mechanics at a robotics conference here in Denver." The picture included with the linked article says it all, really.

17 of 302 comments (clear)

  1. How long... by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... until hollywood actors, then rappers, then any jackass with money wants to buy one?

    1. Re:How long... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Navigating 3D space just requires its own sort of "Drivers test".

      I nominate Descent as the best candidate to virtually test if a person is capable of navigating 3D space.

      If they Die - they fail.
      3 Bumps - they fail.
      If they don't make it out before the level blows up - hmmm 1 demerit.

  2. Airborn, huh? by Essequemodeia · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm pretty sure existing humvees upon discovering an exploding IED at close range fly through the air already.

  3. That's not a Transformer by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 5, Funny

    That is clearly a M.A.S.K. vehicle.

    1. Re:That's not a Transformer by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here is a 15 second clip of the most recent prototype. From the looks of it, it just seems they're about halfway done. A billion dollars in R&D should easily get them higher clearances.

    2. Re:That's not a Transformer by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  4. Weird... by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


    At this rate we'll have flying school buses before flying cars.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  5. Well I'm glad by sean_nestor · · Score: 4, Funny

    that we've clearly got out budget priorities straight in this country.

  6. Dukes of Hazard(The Afghan special) by Herkum01 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Them Duke boys will now be asked to make those supply runs for the military. I just hope that there are enough dirt ramps in the middle east for them to succeed!

  7. I am so glad by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Funny

    a fully automated four-person vehicle that can drive like a car and then take off and fly like an aircraft to avoid roadside bombs

    That those smart military people have decided that bomb blasts are only 2 dimensional.

    Why would you want to make an armored vehicle that flies? There already is such a thing - it's called a HELICOPTER. But I guess when you have access to virtually infinite defense funding, I guess you're allowed to re-invent the wheel.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  8. But.... by daemonenwind · · Score: 3, Funny

    Autobots can't transform into flying things. Only Decepticons do.

    This can't be allowed. We can't let the US Military get infiltrated by Decepticons!

  9. Old News by Target+Practice · · Score: 3, Funny

    I drew pictures like that way back in third grade. This is very old news, and I'm sad it's taken military officials so long to catch up.

    --
    There's a 68.71% chance you're right.
  10. Detection or avoidance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I thought the problem was detecting the IEDs, not avoiding them. DARPA is great, they gave us this global porn distribution network and all, but this idea is just beyond stupid.

  11. ok. stay with me here. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Funny

    Imagine the meeting. Sitting round the table and the next item on the agenda is insurgency and road side bombs.

    How do we avoid the casualties?

    The best answer?

    "I know! We make the humvees fly!"

     

    --
    Deleted
  12. Re:One word: by Toze · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bags of holding are not as heavy as their contents; ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bag_of_holding ) depending on the edition and type of bag, she's only going to be about another 15-60 pounds on top of her regular 300. While Humvees are indeed heavier than this (5200-5900 pounds, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humvee), fat chicks with bags of holding are not an appropriate standard of weight class for military vehicles. I suggest using Huge ( http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/SRD:Huge_Animated_Object ) or Gargantuan ( http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/SRD:Gargantuan_Animated_Object ) animated objects.

    /pedant

    --
    No OS on the planet can protect itself from a user with the admin password. - Yvan256
  13. Re:Why so long? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Even safer- get our young men and women out of the country.

    But then how will the military contractors afford to make political contributions?

    Just think of what a shame it would be if a politician wasn't able to run a television campaign ad because his military contractor buddies couldn't afford to take advantage of their status as a corporate/person/fetus/citizen and donate a few million dollars.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  14. Re:they already have this ... helicopters by ArsonSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

    Say this out loud:

    "FLYING HUMVEES."

    Check your pants, do you have an erection after saying that? If not then there is something wrong with you. Yes, even if you're female. Really that's FLYING HUMVEES!!!!

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.