Slashdot Mirror


Native ZFS Is Coming To Linux Next Month

An anonymous reader writes "Phoronix is reporting that an Indian technology company has been porting the ZFS filesystem to Linux and will be releasing it next month as a native kernel module without a dependence on FUSE. 'In terms of how native ZFS for Linux is being handled by this Indian company, they are releasing their ported ZFS code under the Common Development & Distribution License and will not be attempting to go for mainline integration. Instead, this company will just be releasing their CDDL source-code as a build-able kernel module for users and ensuring it does not use any GPL-only symbols where there would be license conflicts. KQ Infotech also seems confident that Oracle will not attempt to take any legal action against them for this work.'"

4 of 273 comments (clear)

  1. Freedom ain't free by binarylarry · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How open are the two open source licenses if they prevent you from using the software?

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    1. Re:Freedom ain't free by jedidiah · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      > ZFS's purpose was not to be a next generation file system, but to encourage next generation file systems to be built. Free Software has a tendency to get stuck at "good enough"

      This is a tad ironic considering that a 3rd party had to bail out Sun in this regard.

      Solaris was the perfect example of "rut-ware".

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  2. Useless without dedupe by Zlurg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Just ask freenas and openfiler and, heck, even opensolaris
    Oh, and this:
    23212 [root@place]/mnt/Scratch: zfs get utf8only
    bad property list: invalid property 'utf8only'

    Know why? Cuz you don't get any choice in the matter outside Solaris proper.
    Without dedupe and without the ability to use non-UTF8 in filenames (try creating a directory called Télépopmusik in a ZFS pool), ZFS is a future-former. I hear they name filesystems after murderers these days just for the street cred.
    You did not read it here first, but I'll take the heat.

  3. wtf? by sofar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    154 comments and nobody mentions btrfs? Seriously, we don't need zfs anymore... And most definately not some half-assed probably-patent-encumbered version that will never make it upstream - mark my words: it will be unmaintained within 10 minor kernel versions.