Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Freetype Lands In... Microsoft Office?

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the share-well-everyone dept.

phy_si_kal writes "Now Microsoft must love free software. Indeed, Office 2011 for Mac (beta 5 at least) uses Freetype! Somehow they figured out the free software 'clean room implementation' of their own (patented) TrueType technology must better suit their needs."

7 of 212 comments (clear)

  1. Must burn. by Zarf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know who wrote TrueType but MS using FreeType must burn them up. I know it would tick me off.

    --
    [signature]
    1. Re:Must burn. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would it burn them up? There is no financial justification for porting Cleartype when they can just use for Freetype for their Mac version. If they were switching the Windows version to Freetype that would actually be a story.

    2. Re:Must burn. by Zarf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If they were switching the Windows version to Freetype that would actually be a story.

      Good point. I was presuming there already was a Mac version of TrueType. If there isn't one already, you are absolutely right.

      --
      [signature]
    3. Re:Must burn. by ConfusedVorlon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      are you sure?

      it certainly used to be built by a Mac group within MS. I have heard stories of the crazy corporate environment that surrounded them...

      --
      VLC Remote for iPhone and Android
  2. Re:Am I missing something? by A12m0v · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How is this anti-Microsoft? I think it is a good thing that Microsoft is using Freetype.

    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  3. Re:Am I missing something? by xtracto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes it is. The implication is quite clear in this sentence:

    Somehow they figured out the free software "clean room implementation" of their own (patented) TrueType technology must better suit their needs."

    This is nothing but Microsoft saving time and money by using Freetype that is already ported to the Mac instead of doing the work to port Cleartype. This a non-story at best.

    You mean, it is like FreeType "suits better Microsoft's needs" when porting MS Office to OSX??

    And they indeed dumped ClearType for Freetype for this OSX version; that is a true assertion. The fact that they decided to compile others code instead of use their own is exactly that.

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  4. ATSUI is not for Windows 7 by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What I find odd is that they don't just use ATSUI – apple's built in true type font rendering, which is rather better than both freetype and cleartype.

    ATSUI and the Core Text that replaced it in Tiger are Mac-exclusive. If Microsoft used it for Office, it wouldn't be able to ensure consistent document appearance between Mac and Windows versions of Office.