Slashdot Mirror


RIM Reaches Temporary Agreement With India

Canadian_Daemon writes with news that India has granted a 60-day reprieve for their threat to ban BlackBerry devices while the government evaluates RIM's proposal for "lawful access" to users' encrypted data. "The Ministry of Home Affairs said in a statement it would review the situation in 60 days after the Department of Telecommunications studies the feasibility of routing BlackBerry services through a server in India. India wants greater access to encrypted corporate e-mails and instant messaging, though it remains unclear precisely what concessions Research In Motion agreed to in order to avert the ban. About one million BlackBerry users would have been affected in India. 'RIM have made certain proposals for lawful access by law enforcement agencies and these would be operationalized immediately. The feasibility of the solutions offered would be assessed thereafter,' the ministry said."

17 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. RIM job by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it the kind of agreement when RIM rims the Indian gov't and pays stacks of bribes and then all rim users are also forced to rim the Indian gov't?

    well, judge for yourself

    About one million BlackBerry users would have been affected in India.

    "RIM have made certain proposals for lawful access by law enforcement agencies and these would be operationalized immediately. The feasibility of the solutions offered would be assessed thereafter," the ministry said.

    1. Re:RIM job by bhagwad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is different because the Indian government wants the right to tap phones without a warrant. The whole privacy thing hasn't really been discussed in India yet.

    2. Re:RIM job by spun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And ice cream tastes delicious. Tell me something less obvious and more related to this story. Unless I am missing the part where India does not require warrants, this just sounds like what we did here in America, requiring that telecommunications providers give law enforcement the means to lawfully tap communications when a court grants them a warrant.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:RIM job by bhagwad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's what I'm saying. I'm saying that the Indian government wants the ability to access private communications without any sort of check or balance and without a court order. I've been following this story for some time now (since I live here) and I'm pretty sure of this.

  2. Sneakernet by iamhigh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is why sneakernets will never go away; perhaps they become even more valuable in this new era where the government must be able to know all of your communications... just in case, you know.

    That was central to the plot of the Matrix; just replace machines with upper caste.

    --
    No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
  3. Use PGP by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As an end-to-end encryption and validation. Then RIM is free to give access to that.

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
  4. Is there a right to keep secrets about crimes? by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think there is a right to keep crimes secret in any society in the world. In fact, I believe it is in society's best interest to allow courts to compel testimony and subpoena evidence. I also do not see how you can claim that 'lawful access' is the same as 'unlawful access.' Or are you claiming that all governments everywhere will always lie to their citizens? For your own sake I will caution you that when you claim that governments are completely corrupt and evil and always lie, you are veering off into territory where few rational individuals will follow. Most of us recognize that democratic governments, while flawed, are vastly preferably to the tyranny of the strong that would exist without them.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Is there a right to keep secrets about crimes? by bhagwad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or are you claiming that all governments everywhere will always lie to their citizens?

      If they have the power to do so, they will. Therefore, we must not let them get that power.

    2. Re:Is there a right to keep secrets about crimes? by bhagwad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let's just say that as a rule of thumb, you give people as little power as possible. And if you have to give them power, you provide stringent checks, balances, redress mechanisms and transparency. The Indian government (my government) simply doesn't yet have those processes in place. Therefore I'm not willing to risk losing something as precious as my privacy if I have to trust a third party blindly.

    3. Re:Is there a right to keep secrets about crimes? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or are you claiming that all governments everywhere will always lie to their citizens?

      yes, of course. are you new to the planet earth or what?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  5. Re:Also Banning IMAP+SSL? by alen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    you can scan the traffic from the ISP's. blackberries are encrypted at the phone itself along with 3G and other encryption

    or in the real world a tiny minority of people are going to be using IMAP + SSL or HTTPS to check email. since this is outside the USA and there are less rights to worry about, just follow those people

  6. Re:Also Banning IMAP+SSL? by iammani · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gmails defaults to HTTPS and gmail is the most popular one.

  7. Re:makes sense by bhagwad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can see cases where the information will be abused but such risks are no match for the benefits.

    Oh please. I'm an Indian and this is bullshit. What are the "benefits?" The chances of me dying in a terror attack are less than being hit by lightning. I'll take that risk and won't complain if I die thank you very much.

  8. Why BIS is bad by nathana · · Score: 5, Insightful

    See, this is exactly why device manufacturers shouldn't be making devices that are entirely reliant upon an external "cloud" service that is also controlled by the device manufacturer. If Blackberry was merely making devices that could be configured to talk to any server(s) using industry-standard protocols, they wouldn't get themselves into the kind of situation where 1 million deployed devices could have been turned into doorstops overnight. (Maybe my understanding of the way that Blackberries work is misinformed, and so my rant here could be completely groundless -- and just for the record, I'm open to correction -- but I am under the impression that Blackberries need to be in constant communication with the BIS servers that Blackberry themselves run in order to function.)

    This is also why the whole push notification system that Apple came up with for the iPhone is stupid. If something goes wrong with servers that Apple controls, then suddenly that feature across every single phone that has shipped to-date is dead. Device features should not be wholly reliant upon a service that the device manufacturer controls...all you are doing is making a single point-of-failure when you do that.

    -- Nathan

    1. Re:Why BIS is bad by sensationull · · Score: 2, Informative

      Incorrect, BES talks to RIM's servers which in turn talk to the Blackberry devices. if this was not the case then why previously when the RIM servers went down for a couple of days was everyone including BES users up in arms about their email not working and being so reliant on an external system.

      Nokia E series, Windows Mobile, iPhone etc all use a system which works by a direct connection to your provider/companies server over Microsofts ActiveSync protocol to provide push email, calander, etc along with SMS sync in later versions.

      These may seem safer untill you realise that most are encrypted using keys from certification providers that can be compelled by governments to give out your encryption key rendering your own encryption transparent to them. The best bet is private keys generated by a trusted internal certification server if you actually want some form of privacy.

  9. Re:Same deal USA has by omglolbah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yup, that is why you want your own layer of encryption where you have control over the keys.

    Only a matter of time before such a thing is illegal again I fear.

  10. Useless security theater by losttoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    First, as an Indian, I am least shocked at what the government is trying to do. This is what bureaucrats in India do best, that is, fleece money from businesses by pulling up arcane/useless laws and regulations. Behind closed doors, RIM must have bribed dozens of bureaucrats in at least half a dozen government departments. My father worked for an Indian company and was in charge of setting up a power generation plant. He said he had to bribe a dozen different ministries just to get the paperwork moving on prospecting for the site. What's the value of Indian law enforcement agencies being able to tap into RIM? Zilch, squat, none, nada, nil, shunya! After all the circus around this issue, what brain-dead criminal will use blackberry to cover up tracks? This will mostly be used by politicians to settle scores, dig up dirt on each other and sell trade secrets of one business to other or harass them. As any Android or iPhone owner will know, just go to Android market place or iTunes store and there are dozens of apps for encrypting text messages and files. Not happy with closed source apps? Use openssl, gpg or half a dozen other opensource tools to encrypt communications such that no law enforcement agency can crack it in a timely manner to help with an investigation. Much less Indian law enforcement agencies that can barely use computers much less have access to super computers to do any cracking. As for Indians, they are mostly pro-government on this issue. Why? Because RIM acceded to similar demands by UAE and Saudi Arabia so now their national pride is hurt when a foreign company complies with laws of tiny Emirates but not their mighty nation. People in India are tired of a non-functional government that does not take foreign corporations to task for even mass murder (read Bhopal Gas leak). So when they see a government department screw a foreign corporation, they cheer like this will somehow help. It WON'T!!!