Slashdot Mirror


Burning Man Goes Open Source For Cell Phones

coondoggie passes along this excerpt from Network World: "Today I bring you a story that has it all: a solar-powered, low-cost, open source cellular network that's revolutionizing coverage in underprivileged and off-grid spots. It uses VoIP yet works with existing cell phones. It has pedigreed founders. Best of all, it is part of the sex, drugs and art collectively known as Burning Man. ... The technology starts with the 'they-said-it-couldn't-be-done' open source software, OpenBTS. OpenBTS is built on Linux and distributed via the AGPLv3 license. When used with a software-defined radio such as the Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP), it presents a GSM air interface ("Um") to any standard GSM cell phone, with no modification whatsoever required of the phone. It uses open source Asterisk VoIP software as the PBX to connect calls, though it can be used with other soft switches, too. ... This is the third year its founders have decided to trial-by-fire the system by offering free cell phone service to the 50,000-ish attendees at Burning Man, which begins today in Black Rock City, Nevada. "

21 of 152 comments (clear)

  1. Bummer by joebok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I haven't been to Burning Man in a few years, but when I did go it was nice to get away from it all. I suppose I could choose to not use/bring my cell phone - but if other people are still tethered to the ordinary world...? Well - bummer!

    1. Re:Bummer by Radres · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, if this project does what it says, there won't be any place left in the world where you won't be tethered to the grid.

  2. Re:I may have read that one wrong by bertoelcon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's certainly a lot of overlap between the techie crowd and the hippie crowd. Steve Jobs, for example, experimented with LSD.

    Jobs never has been been really a techie though, he is more of a hipster businessman.

    --
    Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
  3. Missing the point by Jherico · · Score: 3, Informative

    While cell phones are nifty and I wouldn't want to live day to day without mine, I think this is largely missing the point of Burning Man.

    --

    Jherico

    What can the average user can do to ensure his security? "Nothing, you're screwed"

    1. Re:Missing the point by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Burning man is about freedom to do whatever you want as long as it doesn't infringe on the freedom of others. If what you want to do is play with your GSM phone rather than indulge in all the music, art, alcohol, drugs, and sex that is going on, well then more power to you, you pathetic little nerd.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  4. Wait. by _KiTA_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this the same Burning Man that claims copyright on any PRIVATE photos taken at their events?

    PASS. Horrible IP grab + single Open Source project is still a negative, methinks.

    1. Re:Wait. by _KiTA_ · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've never been to Burning Man, I've been to other free-love-get-high-hippy-alt-fests so I "get" the point of it, but I don't understand how the Open Source community can stomach Burning Man's copyright claims.

      On paper it sounds really good. "We have a bunch of nudists and hippies (and exhibitionsts) that show up and walk around naked for most of the event. We don't want voyeurs to be getting their rocks off on them."

      Then they went after private photographers own galleries, and the Wiki Commons. Oh, and they sell their own DVDs. Complete coincidence, there.

      Unfortunately Burning Man itself has kinda become mainstream. It's less about art and free love and the like, and more about college guys getting drunk/stoned and harassing girls, trying to get them to strip. I imagine there are other, better, alt-fests around, but the closest thing I get to Hippydome is reading Brad Warner's series of Zen books.

    2. Re:Wait. by blhack · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They do this to prevent people from going there, taking pictures, and selling a "BURNERS GONE WILD!" calendar or something like it.

      They're preventing *others* from profiting off of photos of burners, not profiting off of them themselves.

      This is generally considered a good thing.

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    3. Re:Wait. by stephanruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Couldn't they just have said it Slashdot style? The people being photographed at Burning Man own the copyright of their own image. And please, since we can not determine who is sober and who is not during the event, for any non-personal publication of those photographs, do not make anyone sign any model release form until well after the event has ended. Get their email address, or contact information instead.

    4. Re:Wait. by Prien715 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a non-commercial event. You can't sell food there. You can't sell photos of the event. You can't go take pictures of the human carcass wash or critical tits ride. If there were photographers, these events couldn't happen. There are no "observer" tickets for the event -- it's not a concert.

      Why is it that people always bitch about privacy, and about Google putting up photos of their house or their friends online, a non-profit bans this practice and everyone gets up in arms? I've taken numerous pictures at the event, and as long as you don't try to sell them, you don't get hassled.

      Especially when the policy's author is was the lead council for the Electronic Freedom Frontier.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    5. Re:Wait. by scribblej · · Score: 3, Informative

      How exactly is Burning Man, a for-profit CORPORTION, hosting an event you must BUY tickets to, in any way described as 'non-commercial?'

      It's a bunch of dumb hippies paying to get together and do drugs (excuseme, "EXPRESS THEMELVES") in the desert.

  5. Re:I may have read that one wrong by Requiem18th · · Score: 3, Interesting

    After reading their regulations section however I feel freer out here in the network than in that caged city.

    --
    But... the future refused to change.
  6. OpenBTS With FreeSWITCH by mercutioviz · · Score: 3, Informative

    FYI,

    Some have inquired as to using OpenBTS with FreeSWITCH as well as Asterisk. Alberto Escudero (aka AEP) wrote this wiki page nearly a year ago:

    http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/OpenBTS

    It's slightly dated but the information is accurate.

    -MC

  7. Re:License? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 3, Informative

    The FCC grants them a temporary experimental license because they can't cause much interference out in the middle of the desert. If you fire up OpenBTS anywhere in civilization you're probably breaking the law. Fortunately the equipment is a bit more expensive than CB radio and the carriers have a real incentive to crack down on interferers, so I doubt there will be too many problems in the real world.

  8. Re:License? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
  9. Re:watch out for cops by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I fear the burning man festival may soon flame out, or at best, morph into an anemic lame-o semblance of it's former self

    I think I've been hearing that it's already done that from people who have attended it every year in the last decade. People were probably saying the same thing before then, I just wasn't paying attention.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  10. Re:License? by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ummm, I'm confused. The frequencies that GSM uses are licensed by the FCC to specific operators. The phones are used under the control of the operator, who has a license for each and every cell site.

    It's the confusion born from not RTFAing.

    GSM operates on licensed bandwidth, so for any U.S. installation, the OpenBTS crew always obtains a FCC license and works with the local carrier to coordinate frequency use. When attendees get into range and power up their phones, the system sends them a text that says "Reply to this message with your phone number and you can send and receive text messages and make voice calls."

    I'm guessing the person who modded you up didn't RTFA either.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  11. Burning Man: Disneyland for Marketing Suits by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Burning Man had its brief, shining moment, but when was that...? Circa mid-90's? Now it's a staged pseudo-event the very promotion of which cuts against the grain of what it was supposed to be. I see the jowly middle-aged Marketing Suits queuing up for their Burning Man tickets and I am reminded of the giddy tourists in and around Woodstock, NY paying $25 for a tie-dyed peace-sign T-shirt.

  12. Re:Encryption? by abulafia · · Score: 4, Informative

    Have you ever been? It is the population density of a city, modulo the multistory units (except for the nuts who do build those). I don't know what the plan this year is (I'm missing it this year, sniff), but last year, the camp radius was 2100 feet, putting the vast bulk of those 50K people in a 1-mile diameter area. Not many people camp in "deep playa" (the burner term for the area outside of the radial roads but inside the trash perimeter).

    Back on topic, there's been signal there for at least the last three years, but it became useless once the gates opened and the hordes descended. My take is that cell service during the main event is going to be a net negative, but it is inevitable. It will become something akin to the ongoing war on glow sticks - a bunch of us will mercilessly mock glow-stuck cellphone users and try to shame them into putting the fucking things down and be present, and it mostly won't work.

    Those of us who do LNT (Leave No Trace, the massive cleanup effort post event) will get to ground score cellphones, though. People lose everything else.

    --
    I forget what 8 was for.
  13. Re:I may have read that one wrong by camperslo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Steve Jobs was a coke dealer.

    No, it was John Scully and Pepsi

  14. Re:I may have read that one wrong by node+3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not a techie? He worked as a technician for Atari, and worked on the design for the motherboard for Breakout. You also don't successfully manage a technology company like Apple without having a grasp of technology.

    Of course, Woz was far more adept at hardware, which brings a lot of people to make the claim that Jobs is just a businessman.