AT&T Says Net Rules Must Allow 'Paid Prioritization'
suraj.sun writes "AT&T said Tuesday that any Net neutrality plan restricting its ability to engage in 'paid prioritization' of network traffic would be harmful and contrary to the fundamental principles of the Internet."
So what exactly are they lying about, hmm? "If you define net neutrality to include X, it's a bad idea." "WTF #$@#%$ net neutrality doesn't mean X you ^&#^ liar!" Um, yeah, "net neutrality" has never been well enough defined to say that. That's why you should argue over specific points rather than generic ill-defined terms. "That's fine, because we don't mean it to include X. It includes Y, which is distinct from X because of Z."