Slashdot Mirror


Dubai's Police Chief Calls BlackBerry a Spy Tool

crimeandpunishment writes "Does the battle over the Blackberry ban in the United Arab Emirates have its roots in a spy story? Dubai's police chief says concern over espionage (specifically, by the US and Israel) led to the decision to limit BlackBerry services. The UAE says it will block BlackBerry email, messaging, and web services on October 11th unless it gets access to encrypted data. Comments by Lt. Gen. Dahi Khalfan Tamim are often seen as reflecting the views of Dubai's leadership, and would appear to indicate a very hard line in talks with Research in Motion."

7 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. a system that pays attention to impenetrability by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    in countries that pay a premium on authoritarianism?

    the only thing i wonder is why is this story happening in 2010 and not earlier?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  2. Is there anything special about RIM security? by sl149q · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What is so special about RIM security (speaking as a non-RIM user here...)?

    If I have a Blackberry (or any smartphone, say Android or iPhone) don't I just point at a mail server with IMAP and pick up stuff with SSL/TLS? Are the "spies" so stupid that they wouldn't just point a a non RIM mail server?

    And as mentioned above then you can start using PGP for the content as well.

  3. Re:Shoes a spy tool by erroneus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not "weird" but it certainly calls attention to an interesting duality of standards. The people of the U.S. aren't quite as concerned when its own government does the things it does, but we tend to go ape shit when other governments do the same or even a lesser version of the same. We call it wrong and anti-freedom and all that while at the same time, we justify to ourselves that it is somehow okay for our own government to do this. I'm sure I will never see the day when people finally wake up to reality, but I hope they do.

  4. Let's try this again. "If only he knew..." by stalkedlongtime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's practically a given that TEMPEST-like capabilities moved to satellites, decades ago. Combine that with ECHELON or something like it, and everything that everyone is displaying on their screens (Internet-connected or not) is probably being hoovered up by at least one intelligence agency. Including what's on the screens of those precious Blackberries.

  5. quality of the tool depends on the user by ChipMonk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the hands of a skilled person, including a skilled spy, anything can be useful for any purpose. Even a common orange has its place in a spy's toolkit. Do you really think that's chewing gum in his mouth?

    Every tool has uses that conformists never ponder. Critical thinkers are already ahead of the curve of every government. Of course, no government is willing to admit it (out loud).

  6. Re:RIM is Canadian. by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A Canadian company has to bend over to to wishes of the Canadian gov that enjoys working with the NSA.
    Canada did consider going it alone for crypto after ww2, the the US and the UK both had reasons to pull Canada back in.
    The US did not want an intel free for all between the UK and Canada. So the US/NSA worked very hard to make sure Canada got crypto and intel as did the UK, NZ and Australia. The gift back was very close, long term work. The idea that Canadian crypto work, public or private was ever outside "US demands" over many decades would be very very strange.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  7. Nothing to do with it ... by daveime · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Having spent a couple of years in the UAE back in the 90's, I can tell you the ban has NOTHING to do with spying, and everything to do with Etisalat (the national phone company) desire to control all aspects of IT in the country.

    Years ago, at the advent of the mobile, you could get one (1) model of phone in Abu Dhabi ... the "Hud Hud 1" was the model name, I remember it fondly, with it's external antenna that almost took your eye out, and it's inability to hold a call for more than 5 minutes. You couldn't even use it indoors, I had to sit outside in the bloody desert with only camel spiders for company, to call my girlfriend who worked in Abu Dhabi city. Text hadn't even been invented, so it was calls only.

    There was one (1) phone model, one (1) line provider, one (1) internet provider, one (1) e-mail service, and it was All Etisalat provided.

    Now, 12 years, later, there is a few more phone models, but still only one (1) line provider, one (1) internet provider, one (1) e-mail service ... wanna take a guess who it is ?

    Whichever of Sheikh Khalifa's brothers is running Etisalat doesn't want his business fucked up, and the possibility of anyone using IT without Etisalat getting their pound of flesh is unthinkable. THAT is why they are putting the screws on RIM.