Slashdot Mirror


Rupert Murdoch Publishes North Korean Flash Games

eldavojohn writes "You might recall back in June when it was noted that North Korea was developing and exporting flash games. Now, the isolated nation state is apparently home to some game developers that are being published by a subsidiary of News Corp. (The games include Big Lebowski Bowling and Men In Black). Nosotek Joint Venture Company is treading on thin ice in the eyes of a few academics and specialists that claim the Fox News owner is 'working against US policy.' Concerns grow over the potential influx of cash, creating better programmers that are then leveraged into cyberwarfare capabilities. Nosotek said that 'training them to do games can't bring any harm.' The company asserts its innocence, though details on how much of the games were developed in North Korea are sparse. While one of the poorest nations in the world could clearly use the money, it remains to be seen if hardliner opponents like the United States will treat Nosotek (and parent company News Corp.) as if they're fostering the development of computer programmers inside the DPRK. The United Nations only stipulates that cash exchanged with companies in the DPRK cannot go to companies and businesses associated with military weaponry or the arms trade. Would you feel differently about Big Lebowski Bowling if you knew it was created in North Korea?"

16 of 186 comments (clear)

  1. No suprise here by Pojut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Murdoch owns one of the largest media empires in the world. Why wouldn't he work hand-in-hand with "the enemy"? Never mind the fact that Fox News has trounced the idea of speaking to dictators...but doing business with them is a-ok!

    1. Re:No suprise here by AHuxley · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Same with China.
      Rants on Fox over democracy and freedom, $ in reality.
      http://www.slate.com/id/2184197/

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  2. Re:Good for everyone by migla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Funny how there are two distinct ways of handling un-democratic countries. Either you trade with them to make them more democratic or you boycott them for not being democratic. You (A government + business) can't be wrong, either way. Very clever.

    --
    Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
  3. Kim Jong Il or Rupert Murdoch? by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Frankly, I'm more concerned about News Corp than I am about North Korea.

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    1. Re:Kim Jong Il or Rupert Murdoch? by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And I'm more concerned about China than either. And the U.S. government certainly doesn't seem to have any problem with U.S. companies exporting all their computer jobs there.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  4. Would I buy? by ledow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would I buy a computer game knowing it came from North Korea?

    Break the question down before you even think about answering it - how do I know if something has been programmed in, made in, assembled in, or had any other part of its production process in North Korea, or anywhere else for that matter? Where was Doom 3 programmed? Does it use code written by slave children in India who are force-fed C++ classes instead of their normal education, paid 1p a day and beaten regularly? I have *no* idea and no real way to prove either way. Thus singling out North Korea makes no sense.

    If it is produced in North Korea, how do I *KNOW* what the funds it generates are used to support? Do you know what ID Software spent your $29.99 on? Maybe they sent it to a Gay & Lesbian support group, or funded investment in an African orange grove, or maybe they actually did use it to buy one of their employees a hand gun - you have NO idea. Thus singling out a particular company in North Korea based on accusations and vague connections makes no sense.

    If it comes to my attention that a game is produced by a company who has other actions I disapprove of, will I stop buying the game? Well, I hate Sony. I disagree with most of their actions. Their involvement on a project might well kill it off in my mind. But it very much depends on their involvement and precisely which actions we're talking about, whether they affect my morals and whether or not that should be related to some other product they are producing. I disagree with Afghanistan growing opium, but does that mean I can't buy fruit from Afghanistan IN CASE some of the drug-money was used to sow the field in the first place? Or, surely, giving them an increased trade in other, more legitimate, goods will provide them an incentive to move away from growing opium? I have no idea. Thus singling out a particular game because of tenuous links to things I may not approve it by a single company in its production chain makes no sense.

    Assuming we KNOW that this software was written in North Korea. Assume that we KNOW that every company along the line knew this. Assume that we KNOW that the North Korean's are then taking those "trained" programmers and using them to program nuclear missiles. Does that mean I'd not buy the game? Still unlikely. The production of the game didn't make them program nuclear missiles (or whatever), someone else did. At some point someone clearly crossed the boundary between making a flash game and funding cyberwarfare. That's the person who is the problem, that's the person who should be asked probing questions. That's the part that the government needs to step in and stop ALL trade with that country, not half-assed this company is "good", this company is "bad" because it employs "X" crap.

    And I take offence at the tone of the submission. Trying to make me feel guilty by association is almost entirely racism. The article is trying to paint *all* North Korean activity (including programming a video game) as somehow evil. Would I buy it? If it was a good game that I was interested in, yes. Sadly I don't have an infinite lifetime in which to research every individual, company, funding source and country involved in the production of even a minor flash game. If you have a problem with North Korea, lobby for a blanket trade ban. Otherwise, please stop spreading such rampant discrimination because a newspaper company has a flash game on its website.

  5. "redefining outsourcing" by sosume · · Score: 5, Insightful

    MEMO --

    New ownership means new rules. Therefore:
    - each bug found in production code, means a month of hard labor for the responsible engineers and their entire family
    - no more internets for you!
    - each comment in your code should contain a reference to our glorious leader

    We hope these new rules will everyone more happy and more productive!

    -- K. Jong Il, VP

  6. So, what will Fox News say? by DaRat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What'll be interesting to me is what, if anything, Fox News has to say about this offshoring. I suspect that if one of the other media companies would do the same thing, there would be considerable outrage. In the case of one's parent company, well...

  7. New Axis of Evil by Diamon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FOX has now been linked with North Korea and the Ground Zero Imam. They've clearly taken over Iraq's place in the Axis of Evil. When do we invade?

    1. Re:New Axis of Evil by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      FOX has now been linked with North Korea and the Ground Zero Imam. They've clearly taken over Iraq's place in the Axis of Evil. When do we invade?

      Maybe North Korea will make a game that lets you bomb NewsCorp and Fox.

      Do you play the game or not? Some people would be *so* conflicted ...

  8. Re:Good for everyone by longhairedgnome · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The colonies?

    --
    GENERATION O98346: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and remove a random number from the generation. T
  9. Frothing Moonbats by emh203 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh god, Rupert Murdoch among the moonbats at slashdot has now reached the same level of the "Illuminati" in the conspiracy nut circles.

  10. Republican outrage by quacking+duck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The real question is where is the Republican outrage that a US megacorp is dealing with a crazed nuke-happy communist regime?

    Right-wing media outlets would be all over any "liberal" organization (US or otherwise) that would dare deal with North Korea, or even the relatively benign Cuba, the rationale being that any business run in a communist country is majority-owned by the government itself so paying them therefore directly aids and abets that government.

    Hello? Republicans congresscritters and their supporters? Can I get some outrage here? Just a little bit?

  11. Re:Good for everyone by ultranova · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First thing is food, health, education, a future; once you have all that, you can go with lesser important details like democracy.

    History strongly suggests that you can only have the former when you have the last. Dictatorships have a tendency to channel all resources for the benefit of the dictator, leading to ordinary people starving. It happened in France, it's happening in North Korea now.

    If you lack freedom, chances are that you'll soon lack everything else too.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  12. Re:Good for everyone by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Alright, I'll call your bluff on that. What are some historical examples of democracy finding its way when the people are fed, healthy, and working and why would it have been different if the people were not fed, healthy, and working?

    Taiwan and South Korea are recent examples. This is happening today in places like Thailand and Iran. The recent riots in Bangkok and Tehran were not bread riots, they were about elections.

  13. Re:Not sure about that by sourcerror · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a Hungarian I approve your post :)
    (no mod point yet, sorry)