Slashdot Mirror


Lo-Fi Phones and the Future

bossanovalithium writes "Back in 1936 — 74 years ago — boffins accepted that about 3.3Khz was the accepted frequency that telephone calls are going to run on and it's been like that, generally, ever since. Call quality is reasonable but leaves a lot to be desired. Think calls from Skype to Skype where quality is often crystal clear." It's crazy to me that (for people with decent mics at least) Ventrillo sounds better than corporate conference calls.

1 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. Bandwidth isn't today's biggest problem with calls by MadCow42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't have an issue with the frequency range, but certainly do with latency, and the lack of true duplex any more!

    I find (found) that talking on a true analog line is MUCH easier than any digital line today - be that Skype, cell phones, or even land lines in most countries. I'm always amazed when traveling abroad when I make a local call on a truly-analog system how much nicer the experience is!

    With today's systems in "Westernized" countries, you can't even have an effective 2-way conversation. The duplex performance sucks - you can't hear anything while you're talking. Add to that a small but noticable delay, and you have to resort to long pauses between sentences to ensure you don't talk over one another.

    Am I the only one that notices this? It's AWFUL compared to what it was like 20 years ago.

    MadCow.

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.