Slashdot Mirror


Pentagon Aims To Buy Up Book

jamie writes "Operation Dark Heart, a book about the adventures and frustrations of an Army officer who served in Afghanistan, has ruffled some feathers at the Pentagon. From the article: 'The Defense Department is attempting to buy the entire first printing — 10,000 copies — of a memoir by a controversial former Defense Intelligence Agency officer so that the book can be destroyed, according to military and other sources."

10 of 347 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Is this really censorship? by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your tax dollars at work...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  2. Founding Fathers do facepalm by 0111+1110 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think our government should just abolish the first amendment. They clearly don't believe in it. This just makes me so sick. Where is wikileaks when you need them?

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    1. Re:Founding Fathers do facepalm by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The first amendment is irrelevant. From TFA, the military's attempting to keep hidden the real names of intelligence officers involved with some actions. Any criticism of the military actions is still likely in the second edition, which is already approved. The first amendment does not grant the right to endanger others by means of speech. It grants the right to hold and express any opinions you want, and Congress will not render such expression illegal.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  3. Re:Blurb totally misleading. by BlakJak-ZL1VMF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    mod parent up, case dismissed, nothing to see here, move along...

    misleading blurbs FTL.

    --
    -.-. --.-
  4. Re:Is this really censorship? by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But when the first printing sells out, the publisher is only going to print more. Clearly this is a scam to funnel taxpayer money into the pockets of this "former officer", paying a hefty fee to the publisher to launder the dough.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  5. Re:Blurb totally misleading. by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't US officers have to agree to let the military vet any books about their experiences if they want the job?

  6. Re:Is this really censorship? by Jurily · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's actually the honourable thing to do in this case - along with firing whoever signed off on it in the Reserve component.

    Once you accept that "a lot of material that shouldn't have been printed in the first place" indeed shouldn't have been printed, sure.

    However, it's still censorship. The only question is whether we approve of it.

  7. Re:Ignorance: America's biggest gift to itself. by Americano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sorry, before I can take your post seriously, I require full disclosure, in the form of all of your personal information, Anonymous Coward.

    Please submit it for open discussion, and then we can continue talking about how the only way to discuss anything is with all information being freely available to the public.

    I mean, fair is fair, right?

  8. Re:Is this really censorship? by Zixaphir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because you can't read the damned book. God.

    --
    "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds"
  9. Re:Is this really censorship? by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Personally I believe the only way forward is for ALL drugs to be legal, and here is why: I'm sorry if I don't get this quote right, or if I attribute it to the wrong person,(I believe it was from William F. Buckley Jr) but it really helped explain it simply..."If I put a bottle on a table with a skull and crossbones on it, and I say to you "This is poison, it will destroy your health, marriage, family, and finally kill you" and you push past me and down the bottle? STUPID YOU! Why should I have to saddle MY family and MY country with billions in debt and taxes to build cages and armed guards around that bottle?"

    As for TFA, frankly with the amount of pure bald faced lies we have seen coming from the military (we're winning? civilian deaths are low! the government there works!) I wouldn't trust them to tell me water was wet if it was raining on my head.If you want people to support you then you have to stop CONSTANTLY LYING. So until they do a 180 on their current SOP I'm gonna have to vote for them being lying scumbags and call this censorship. After all, if you go ahead and trust the person of has repeatedly lied to you over and over and over again, who is the fool?

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.