Slashdot Mirror


Boxee Box Pre-Orders Start At $229

Engadget is reporting that Boxee is taking pre-orders at $229 for their set-top box that is utterly guaranteed to not fit into any stereo component rack you might have. They also have switched chipsets from the Tegra 2 to the CE4100. I'm not sure about this thing, but I'd sure like to play with one as I lust for the day when every piece of media I have can be played from a single device. I suspect it'll never happen.

46 of 266 comments (clear)

  1. It's not a settop box and it's not a setbottom box by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why oh why would they make it so fiendishly hard to place one of these things? Is it really aesthetically pleasing to have to dedicate the whole cabinet under your TV (if you even have one) to this awkward device?

    I for one want to see more devices that stay 100% out-of-the-fucking-way. Let me hide it in a low profile cabinet. Let me mount it BEHIND my TV if I want. I bought the TV to look at the TV... I bought your device, TO KEEP LOOKING AT THE TV. Sigh.

  2. The Anti-Slashvertisement? by damn_registrars · · Score: 2, Insightful
    We're used to seeing plenty of blatant advertising in article summaries, but this surprised me a bit to see on the front page:

    their set top box that is utterly guaranteed to not fit into any stereo component rack you might have

    Did someone from Boxee get in a fight with slashdot's corporate overlords?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:The Anti-Slashvertisement? by SydShamino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did you look at the picture?

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:The Anti-Slashvertisement? by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Taco has this thing about emerging media player technology where he establishes a nearly impossible set of requirements and then denegrates each new hardware release because it does not meet each and every one of them.

      For whatever reason it appears he builds a media catalog consisting of as many disparate file formats, sizes, bitrates, pixel depths, containers, and codecs as he possibly can then salts them out across spinning hard drives, thumb drives, burned CDs, DVDs, Blu-Rays, 3.5" floppies, SSDs, and Firewire interface Zip drives, all attached to a network, some segments of which are token ring, via a smattering of obscure operating systems. He complains when no one builds a device that caters to his specific blend of geekery. This thing won't upsample a full duplex ogg vorbis DVD rip in NTSC to 1080p and simultaneously serve it to my laptop and video ipod running rockbox? Think I'll wait to buy.

      You'd think he would have learned his lesson with audio, but he did not.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    3. Re:The Anti-Slashvertisement? by operagost · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not rectangular. Bigger than a Nomad. Lame.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  3. 'All in one media player' exists already... by Lukano · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seriously, the 'all in one' solution you dream of exists - in XBMC. A cheap Atom/ION nettop for ~$200, install XBMC (live, ubuntu, win7, doesn't matter) and go to town.

    1. Re:'All in one media player' exists already... by Anonymous+Showered · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not trolling, but how's 1080p x264 playback with that setup? I have a Popcorn Hour A100 (old-school) that does it all except DTS audio... :\

    2. Re:'All in one media player' exists already... by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not trolling, but how's 1080p x264 playback with that setup? I have a Popcorn Hour A100 (old-school) that does it all except DTS audio... :\

      Fantastic.

      The important bit to note is the ION. If you have a NVidia GPU, you can use the Live or Linux (And at this point, I think the Windows version supports GPU acceleration) versions, and if you enable VDPAU (Or the Windows equivalent), and it will happily accelerate the video. I get full 1080p playback with no dropped frames or stuttering on a Asus AspireRevo that is almost completely silent.

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    3. Re:'All in one media player' exists already... by Radish03 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are correct about the windows version, however currently only the new beta (and previous nightly builds) support GPU acceleration. The beta seems pretty solid and has yet to give me any problems. I'm presently running it with win7 on an acer revo 3610, and it's working very well.

  4. My god. by Beelzebud · · Score: 2, Funny

    Design Fail! They need to fire whoever green lit that design...

    1. Re:My god. by ciderbrew · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sure "they" asked for 3 designs. So the designer did just that.
      1st) Designer pretentious wank, (The one he loved).
      2nd) Standard Corporate Beige (the one they'll pick).
      3rd) An awful one (they'll never want this one).

      Management/"they" didn't like the pretentious one; but didn't want to be seen playing safe with the 2nd one. So what could they pick? The 3rd mental design.
      Never design a "they'll never want this one" - They always want that one..

    2. Re:My god. by kimvette · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No kidding. I have a lot of AV components - 5x240W AV receiver, DVD recorder, Cable DVR, VCR, VCR (both VCRs unplugged as they rarely see use now), cassette deck (unplugged for the same reason) and a blu-ray player. The blu-ray player is annoying as it isn't the standard 18" wide rectangular design - it's designed to either be wall-mounted or to sit at a slant on a stand, out in view (see http://www.gadgetreview.com/2009/04/samsung-bd-p6400-ultra-slim-blu-ray-player-now-available-at-best-buy.html and http://www.disc-players.com/players/manufacturers/pos/samsung_bd-p4600/?photo=2 ). I tolerated it because I happened to find an offer for it for only $30 additional to bundle it with the LN46B650, so I went for it. It's not so bad because it can sit in front of the screen and not interfere with the view, and it's fairly attractive, but I'd rather put it on a shelf underneath with the rest of the components.

      The boxee though? At least the Samsgung BD-P6400 is attractive enough to be in plain view, but not so tall that it obstructs the view. The Boxee is something I would never buy because not only does it have to be in plain site, not fit into a standard AV or "stereo" rack, but has been designed to be as ugly as anyone could possibly imagine.

      I think ciderbrew is right the designer probably came up with three designs. I will describe what I imagine here:

      1. First design: Attractive, gloss black with capacitive touch panel on the front with an OLED or LED-LCD display for full optical disc control. with ports intelligently placed, and a slim IR receiver on a cable for placement on top of the panel, USB (or ESATA) port each on its own bus (not hung off a USB hub) for an external Blu-Ray drive, with an optional slim Blu-Ray drive being offered either as an accessory, or as part of a bundle. Verdict: too expensive.

      2. Classic cheap, conservative design: Minimalist flourescent or LED display for the basic stuff (off/on, port status, etc.) with ports on the front and rear, with the front ports being behind a flip-down door. No support for external Blu-Ray, but is reasonably attractive, if ordinary, and designed to be out-of-sight/out of mine because it will Just Work(tm). Verdict: too ordinary.

      3. That hideous odd-shaped green and black piece of shit that actually went to market, but absolutely no one will want cluttering up their TV stand, or to take up 4U to 5U of space in their AV rack (allow for clearance to actually insert media cards, etc. with no support for external blu-ray drive. Lower performance than the competition, and far more likely to be reviled and hated by anyone with a sense of either style or practicality. The verdict: "it's cheap, and people will remember it. It's all in the branding!"

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    3. Re:My god. by rigorrogue · · Score: 3, Funny

      A design so bad it's not even wrong, it looks like it's sinking into the floor in self-disgust.

      --
      science in government
  5. "not fit into any stereo component rack..." by Cornwallis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And for that reason alone I won't get it. I love the idea but more than sick of "edgy" for its own sake. Mebbe I can come up with a new business that creates a case it will slide into allowing it to fit on everyone's furniture.

  6. Price point by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've love to see the Boxee Box succeed, but its price point is pretty high compared to its competitors. The WD TV Live set-top is half the price, and the Roku HD player is even less. A netflix/youtube enabled BluRay player is comparable in price, but includes the BluRay functionalities. Ditto for a PS3. I realize that the Boxee may have other functionalities that set it apart from the others, but I'm not sure if the average user will realize that.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
  7. You already can by Pojut · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd sure like to play with one as I lust for the day when every piece of media I have can be played from a single device. I suspect it'll never happen

    HTPC = every piece of media you have can be played from a single device.

    With the advent of how powerful (and inexpensively) you can build miniITX systems now, plus being able to buy 2TB hard drives for around the $100-$110 mark, building an HTPC has never been cheaper, easier, or smaller.

    1. Re:You already can by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      this.

      I was an early adopter for the older popcorn hour boxes. they were what you needed about 2 or 3 yrs ago. but now, things are truly fanless (mini-itx asus ION gfx chipset ftw) and can play anything. the popcorn box has a hardware solution but its software, well, still sucks after 3 yrs and they refuse to truly fix annoying bugs in their software (or, they simply cannot; they are not very good programmers and refuse to open their platform and get proper help).

      set top boxes are 'get me by' boxes until pc's are all fanless and living-room silent. itx boxes are (or can be) but its still not as common as silent STB's.

      still, stb's are on their way out for serious htpc guys. now that pc's can be silent AND also have video accel that keeps a+v in sync (sigh, finally) and does not drop frames, there is less of a reason for hardware closed-source stb's.

      there will continue to be a split in userbase. like today, those that want turnkey solutions will buy cable boxes or rent them, etc. the rest of us will roll our own and use a silent pc for that.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:You already can by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not even close for 99.99% of the population. Hell, I'm a tinkerer and have been for 30 years and I can't get a box to play everything that is also stable enough for my wife and daughter to use for more than a month or two without having to update or reset something.

      Setup linux without ever having used the OS? Good fucking luck - you'll end up buying $200 extra in compatible components because you're almost guaranteed to get a device that isn't compiled into the standard kernel on the first try out. Especially if you want to use an old or wireless network card. Played many encrypted bluray discs recently (i.e. stick in your 6 year old's new BR from WalMart and have it play seamlessly?)

      WMC can't play shit out of the box. Mkv? nope. FLAC? nope. Anything apple? nope. Sure, you can go get codec packs, but most cause as many problems as they solve. Shark mostly "just works," but you'd better strip out all the subtitles and extra audio streams from them, 'cause WMC can't choose either on the fly.

      Apple? Right - you'd better just start recoding now.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:You already can by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Setup linux without ever having used the OS? Good fucking luck - you'll end up buying $200 extra in compatible components

      Nonsense. You can get an entire box that is that much that is VERY Linux friendly.

      All it takes is a little research. You would need to it for a Windows based setup anyways because some hardware just isn't up to the job regardless of what OS you're running.

      Admittedly few consumers want to put any thought into what they buy (especially research).

      > Not even close for 99.99% of the population. Hell, I'm a tinkerer and have been for 30 years and
      > I can't get a box to play everything that is also stable enough for my wife and daughter to use
      > for more than a month or two without having to update or reset something.

      You should turn in your "tinkerer" card. You don't deserve to tell anyone that you are such a thing.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  8. media box plug by Kludge · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I lust for the day when every piece of media I have can be played from a single device. I suspect it'll never happen.

    This one works for me.
    http://www.captiveworks.com/cw4000hd.php

  9. Re:It's not a settop box and it's not a setbottom by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the advantages of the PS3's otherwise ridiculous use of Bluetooth for the DVD remote is that the whole console can be out of site. Mine sits vertically behind the TV which gives it lots of room to breath and since it does triple duty as media server, Blu-Ray player, and gaming console it means that I really don't have much cluttering up my entertainment center; just a cable box and a stereo receiver.

  10. Re:It's not a settop box and it's not a setbottom by Kristopeit,+M.+D. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why oh why would they make it so fiendishly hard to place one of these things?

    how about ventilation issues with idiot consumers not heeding warnings about stacking devices, and then filing warranty claims when they break?

  11. Re:It's not a settop box and it's not a setbottom by Pojut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    TVersity + PS3 (or Xbox 360) = unlimited entertainment.

  12. if you can't make it small by mevets · · Score: 3, Funny

    make it very big. medium size impresses no one. Think how important you will feel if you have to replace your TV stand just to accommodate this.....

  13. Cutsie design by Artifakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The case is a box, with one corner lopped so it sits at an angle (hence the part in the summary about how it won't fit in a rack.). As if this weren't enough to make it call attention to itself, the default color scheme is carbon and acid green.
            The design is meant to sell to people who want to show off how they have one, and create consumer envy as a way of moving more units. The problem is, some customers will be turned off by that - for example, they want a device that blends with the others in their viewing room. The color scheme makes this effect worse - after a certain point, the Boxee Box is already distinctive, and has caught the attention of that market share that values gadgets standing out from the crowd - so more distinction will only cost them customers. Acid green is a color that came into style briefly a few years ago, and is now dated to the people who have strong interior decorator modes and really care about such trends - using it this late in the trend cycle comes off a little like making the device in the customer's choice of Almond, Harvest Gold or Avocado.
            If they had kept the price under 200$, all that might have flown, with sales to the college dorm crowd and the general youth market, but with the new price point, the design is aimed at a slightly older demographic, one that will actually care about this sort of thing.
            As final proof that the Boxee Box isn't going to sell well, I'd buy one, even at the new price. It triggers geeklust in me. The very last tech-thing I bought was a Doctor Who Sonic Screwdriver replica (Matt Smith version). Does that sound like a real market exists?

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  14. Re:Intel CE4100... Where Can I find more about it? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hardware acceleration. The CE4100 is an integrated CPU + GPU package from what I can tell - the Atom core itself is kind of weak, but the integrated GPU on that particular part is what handles all of the heavy lifting for VC-1, MPEG-2, and H.264.

    A normal Atom CPU can achieve the same thing when paired with a capable video chipset - however it usually doesn't have a capable video chipset paired to it.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  15. Le Sigh by Conception · · Score: 2, Funny

    *glances at my popbox*

    *sighs*

  16. Details from the article by slapout · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Update: We just learned that Amazon will be selling it for $199, though the MSRP will remain $229.

    At a rendezvous in San Francisco, Avner Ronen told us the decision to abandon Tegra 2 was about performance and nothing more: "The major problem we had with the Tegra 2 was support for high-profile HD playback," he said. "You can do high-profile VC-1 with Tegra 2, but not H.264." It was a problem of bitrate, he told us, and while NVIDIA's dual-core Tegra T20 was apparently not up to the task, the team had internally tested Intel's CE4100 decoding streams at up to 90 megabits per second. The newly revamped Boxee Box is now capable of 1080p H.264 playback at 60fps, and... well, that's actually about it."

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  17. Re:Intel CE4100... Where Can I find more about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Block Diagram here.

    That "Multi Format HW Decoder" block is probably Imagination Technologies' VXD core.

  18. Re:It's not a settop box and it's not a setbottom by jeffmeden · · Score: 4, Informative

    So you make a device that's stackable, and you know that a good number of customers prefer to put their equipment in a cabinet, and yet you blame the customers when they do so, the device creates enough heat to cook it, and it fails?

    Problem 1: not enough fans or vents / device designed for too low of a temperature envelope
    Problem 2: No hardware fail-safe / device can go into thermal run-away and not shut down before permanent damage is done

    I say that lack of very easy fixes for these two problems are *definitely* the manufacturer's fault.

  19. Here's a novel idea by Theoboley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a box right? You don't want it sitting slanted to one side?? Turn it on its side. NOW it'll fit into your AV Cabinet.

    --
    Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
  20. Re:It's not a settop box and it's not a setbottom by TheKidWho · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tell that to the mainframe guys.

  21. Re:It's not a settop box and it's not a setbottom by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

    Maybe it's me but does anyone else think that the design might be off-putting to consumers. It looks like it's missing pieces. Remember consumers judge by first impressions more than technical specs. I remember one lady was flabbergasted that the original iMac wasn't just the monitor. She couldn't believe that it was the whole computer and thought it was magic even though many companies including Apple have been selling all-in-one desktops before.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  22. SGX doesn't decode 1080p by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 2, Interesting

    SGX is a 3D accelerator only. I'm sure there is something in that system that is doing video acceleration, but the SGX isn't it.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  23. Re:Every piece of media played from a single devic by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Second, a mouse is infinitely better in your living room than a remote.

    I think many people would disagree with "better". A mouse is better at a computer interface than a remote but most people don't want a computer interface when dealing with a media center. If you're watching a show and you decide to fast forward, how do you do that with a mouse? Program alternate buttons? Also with a mouse you need some sort of surface. Some people don't have coffee tables or end tables and that's how they like it. Most consumers use remotes because it's rather simplified. A mouse while workable isn't what they want.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  24. Re:It's not a settop box and it's not a setbottom by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 2, Funny

    the whole console can be out of site.

    Where in a rackmount in a datacenter? Ooooh, you mean "out of sight".

    That said, I'd like to have a bluetooth remote for my (future) HTPC... Can you get anything like it, I searched a bit but didn't find anything. Most seems to be infra-red and using a cellphone isn't ideal.

  25. Re:It's not a settop box and it's not a setbottom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I prefer the open source PS3 Media Server myself.

  26. Lust for the day? by LanMan04 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I lust for the day when every piece of media I have can be played from a single device. I suspect it'll never happen.

    Um, I bought a Mac Mini in 2006 that does exactly that.

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
    1. Re:Lust for the day? by majortom1981 · · Score: 2, Informative

      nO it doesnt I thought macs do not play blu-ray

  27. Re:It's not a settop box and it's not a setbottom by aztracker1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've got an HTPC setup myself... I use boxee mainly with an MCE remote, and a wireless keyboard (when needed). I've been considering switching out to a general device, and if it weren't for my utter despising of Sony, would probably go the PS3 + TVersity route. The 360 works too, but the PS3 adds BluRay. I've done 360 + TVersity, and it works pretty well. I do prefer Boxee over about everything else at this point, but do wish that some of the apps were a bit better consolidated, and the feeds worked a bit faster in some of them... The Revision 3 app is about the best one available... I've never gotten much use out of the "friends" portion of Boxee though, and don't really care to broadcast everything I watch (I disable this). Just adding some worthless commentary to the fray. One thing I do want to do as soon as it's available is order the separate remote.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  28. still buggy? by Triv · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I tried to use Boxee on the Mini attached to my TV for a good month before giving up in frustration - it was buggy as hell, crashed daily, refused to recognize any of my media without them being named in a maddeningly specific way and without them being organized in a manner that IMDB would be able to parse without any manual override. Practically every fix required a keyboard and mouse to implement which completely defeats my assumption of how a media center is supposed to work.

    I'm assuming they've fixed these problems? Because as it stands, you'd be flat-out nuts to lay down 200 bucks for something like that.

  29. Re:It's not a settop box and it's not a setbottom by longhairedgnome · · Score: 2, Funny

    Behind the tinfoil

    --
    GENERATION O98346: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and remove a random number from the generation. T
  30. 4.5 x 4.5 x 4.6 inches ; 2.5 pounds by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Informative

    uh... so I turn it on its side, what did that gain me exactly?

    Its a cube. It is also taller than many other components in most TV stands which are modeled to hold dvd players; most are slim; and receivers/av which stack nicely with other components.

    This device is just odd for odd's sake. At least the new Apple TV is black meaning I no longer have to work to hide it, it blends now.

    There just is no point in making this device in the shape it is. Its more gimmick than anything else.

    Oh, Amazon sells it for $199 and has the dimensions and pictures

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0038JE07O

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  31. Re:It's not a settop box and it's not a setbottom by Fallingcow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've found that it works better in some ways, but worse in others.

    Sometimes my PS3 has trouble finding it, while TVersity never has that problem. TVersity's use of bandwidth is also far more efficient, even if I crank the quality way the hell down on PS3MS--high quality standard-definition movies will halt frequently to buffer with PS3 Media Server over my 802.11G wireless network, while TVersity can usually play 720p over the same connection with only rare hiccups.

    On the other hand, TVersity doesn't always like to transcode files, sometimes simply telling me the format is not supported, and PS3 Media Server has better thumbnail capabilities.

    Overall, I'll take the watchable TVersity over the often unwatchable PS3MS. If I ever get around to running a cable from the router in the basement to the PS3 upstairs, though, I'll probably switch.

  32. Re:Design fail by CyberDragon777 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This happens when you combine the Weighted Storage Cube and Alien acid blood.

    --
    We both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
  33. Re:Troll! by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Informative

    Boxee is a fork of XBMC with social networking addons much like what Apple has just been credit for inventing.

    The Boxee box would be a nice box if not for it's "we aren't going to let you put anything else in the media cabinet" approach to design.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.