Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Government Muzzling Scientists

IllogicalStudent writes with this excerpt from The Vancouver Sun: "The Harper government has tightened the muzzle on federal scientists, going so far as to control when and what they can say about floods at the end of the last ice age. Natural Resources Canada scientists were told this spring they need 'pre-approval' from Minister Christian Paradis' office to speak with journalists. Their 'media lines' also need ministerial approval, say documents obtained by Postmedia News through access-to-information legislation. The documents say the 'new' rules went into force in March and reveal how they apply not only to contentious issues, including the oilsands, but benign subjects such as floods that occurred 13,000 years ago. They also give a glimpse of how Canadians are being cut off from scientists whose work is financed by taxpayers, critics say, and is often of significant public interest — be it about fish stocks, genetically modified crops or mercury pollution in the Athabasca River."

12 of 352 comments (clear)

  1. My gosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    that's like muzzling 1.25 American scientists, eh?

    1. Re:My gosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, the muzzles are required to keep the tops of their floppy heads from falling off.

  2. Seems reasonable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Canadians voted for Harper and he is simply giving them what they asked for. Everybody knows scientists just take money from the government by ginning up fear and give us nothing tangible in return. It's time somebody stood up to them.

  3. Heh... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why don't I have the feeling there's about to be a flood of, "That's it, I'm moving to the U.S.!"

    1. Re:Heh... by blair1q · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's true, but the government scientists with the data aren't allowed to tell you it's true.

    2. Re:Heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why don't I have the feeling there's about to be a flood of, "That's it, I'm moving to the U.S.!"

      Because the Canadian Government report on the matter says Canada is the better place to live.

  4. Re:Eh? by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Funny

    They commissioned a scientist to research it, but the government didn't like the results so they didn't approve the scientist's application to publish.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  5. Re:That's what I love about Conservatives by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's so transparent the policy is now invisible. How much more do you want from them?

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  6. Re:The Name by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nobody expects the Canadian Inquisition! Our chief weapon is Tim Horton's, Tim Horton's and hockey. Our two chief weapons are Tim Horton's, hockey, and a whole lot of boreal forest ... I'll come in again.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  7. Re:sound like more mass covering laws that by jd · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't see the difficulty. We now know "Transparency" = "keeping the scientists invisible" (you can't get much more transparent than that) and "accountability" = "having bean-pushers really run the country".

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  8. The "Reality" reason for muzzling scientists by presidenteloco · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Conservative government in Canada is similar to the Republicans in the USA.

    And in the immortal words of Stephen Colbert:

    "Reality has a well-known liberal bias."

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  9. Re:no surprise by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Kind of like when they tried to take over Canada and didn't. Somehow that war wasn't lost either.