Slashdot Mirror


Torvalds Becomes an American Citizen

netbuzz writes "Having brought his open-source work and family to the United States from Finland some time ago, Linus Torvalds has marked an important personal milestone by attaining US citizenship. A casual remark on the Linux kernel mailing list about registering to vote led to the community being in on the news. Torvalds has acknowledged being a bit of a procrastinator on this move, writing in a 2008 blog post: 'Yeah, yeah, we should probably have done the citizenship thing a long time ago, since we've been here long enough (and two of the kids are US citizens by virtue of being born here), but anybody who has had dealings with the INS will likely want to avoid any more of them, and maybe things have gotten better with a new name and changes, but nothing has really made me feel like I really need that paperwork headache again.' In that post he also expresses dislike for the American style of politics in which he will now be able to participate directly."

100 of 654 comments (clear)

  1. Interesting... by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but does he run Linux?

    1. Re:Interesting... by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think he's referring to the practice at mass-immigration checkpoints like Ellis Island, where, when the processor couldn't spell particularly complicated names (for instance, those of Polish or Eastern European origin), that they'd just write down something Anglo-sounding and tell them to get used to it. He may have been afraid that he'd end up Linus Van Pelt rather than Linus Torvalds.

  2. Derp by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Funny

    He took our jerbs!

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Derp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      He took our jerbs!

      Darl, is that you?

  3. So what? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's his own business.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's his own business.

      Don't you know anything? His name is known among some people so they have to pretend to understand him on a personal level and act like they personally know him and are very concerned about the most trivial and personal details of his life. That's what we do with celebrities.

      Hey, did you know that some woman you've never met is having relationship problems with some man you've never met? Who gives a fuck? Oh yeah, one of them can act/sing/dance so that makes it really really important! Let's not do this with programmers. Please.

      Epictetus said something about how talking about the affairs of others leads to small-mindedness. He couldn't have been more on the money.

    2. Re:So what? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yup. Although on the plus side it is probably a good thing that people who actually contribute to society and progress are being talked about with such interest. Pity such attention is usually focused on people who sing songs and abuse substances but still manage to get paid huge sums for their dubious efforts.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:So what? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Epictetus said something about how talking about the affairs of others leads to small-mindedness. He couldn't have been more on the money.

      Maybe so but did you know that Epictetus was having an affair with one of his slavegirls?

  4. immigration category by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm more interested what his immigration category was? Mine was EB-2 (Person with advanced degree: Master or Ph.D). I suspect his was EB-1 (Person of national interest).

    --
    In Liberty, Rene
    1. Re:immigration category by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm more interested what his immigration category was? Mine was EB-2 (Person with advanced degree: Master or Ph.D). I suspect his was EB-1 (Person of national interest).

      Probably an "O-1", a rare beast.

    2. Re:immigration category by sakdoctor · · Score: 3, Funny

      More likely "O log n"

    3. Re:immigration category by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 5, Informative

      H1B is a non-immigrant visa, good for three years, renewable for another three, and then year over year as long as a permanent residency adjustment of status petition has not yet been adjudicated.

      To become a naturalized citizen, one must be a lawful permanent resident first, for five years. To become a lawful permanent resident, requires an immigrant visa, basically, a "Green Card". To get a Green Card, that is not based on family sponsorship, but employment sponsorship, one is placed into several prioritized categories:

      EB-1: Persons of National Interest or Extraordinary Ability (Nobel prize winners, etc.);

      EB-2: Persons with Advanced Degrees;

      EB-3: Skilled Workers;

      EB-4: Special Immigrants;

      EB-5: Visa Investors ($1M and creating ten American jobs, or $500k and investing in a rural area paying 150% of the national wage).

      --
      In Liberty, Rene
    4. Re:immigration category by TheSync · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'd like to know as well.

      According to the Immigration and Nationality Act, the annual immigrant visa quota is 140,000 for employment-based (EB-x) immigration. EB-1, EB-2 and EB-3 each receive 28.6% of the total number, while EB-4 and EB-5 each receives 7.1% separately.

      For the current 40,000 quota of EB-2 preference, each country receives 7%, with 3,000 available for China and India, 2,500 for the other countries, and 9,000 remaining for use by those countries in need, such as India and China.

      Linus could also have come in through one of the 32,000 diversity (DV) visas available to Europeans.

      Once here (legally with a green card). having American citizen children or an American citizen spouse is one of the fastest ways to be come a citizen (3 years as a spouse, 5 years for children).

      The best guide to understanding US immigration laws is this handy poster.

    5. Re:immigration category by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not really. One should be classified in the most preferential category to begin with. Additional work experience will not let you move up a category. So, you should "fill any gaps" (like get that graduate degree) first, or at least while on a non-immigrant visa. You can't really go from EB-2 to EB-1.

      --
      In Liberty, Rene
    6. Re:immigration category by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Funny

      God - it sounds COMPLICATED to immigrate to the United States! I think I'll just stay right here in Arkansas. It can't be worth the bother.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    7. Re:immigration category by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      LOL.

      Seriously, though, the idea is to filter in those who are likely to be a net benefit to those already here, and filter out the rest.

      So, you don't want to displace existing workers, or depress the wage base. The sad part is that too many immigrants "cheat" giving the rest of us a bad reputation, and the process, even if you meet the criteria, is excruciatingly slow.

      It used to be that to get an employment-based green card, you generally had to be here on an H1B visa, which had strict limits to how long one could stay, and the processing times for the green card could easily exceed those limits. Once your time was up you had to leave, and leaving abandoned your green card petition. There were cases of people waiting years for a green card, only to have to leave the day before their status was adjusted, abandoning everything.

      One of the things Bush Jr. did was eliminate that nonsense: if you were in the final adjustment of status stage, you could extend your H1B on a year over year basis until your status was adjusted.

      It was rather like winning a foot race, and losing because they took too long to give you your medal.

      The other thing Bush Jr. did was make H1Bs more portable. One problem that non-immigrants faced was the propensity toward horrible working conditions because they could not get another job in their line of work if fired, and some unscrupulous employers knew this and paid slave wages. This was illegal (foreign workers had to be paid the prevailing wage so as to not depress it), but fear kept many from speaking up. With the new rules, they could just leave. The benefits to American workers were that wages were not being illegally depressed with no way to find out without much sleuthing,

      --
      In Liberty, Rene
    8. Re:immigration category by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I immigrated from Canada to the U.S. for lower taxes and better health care.

      --
      In Liberty, Rene
  5. WOAH WOAH WOAH by moogied · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He has TWO kids here? And he had those while NOT being a full american citizen? He had Anchor babies? Someone call FOX news please. We cannot have this filth just coming here and knocking out brats!
    Wait what? He is a constructive member of society? Hes already contributed to the American culture before he was a citizen? The entire idea of making immigration more difficult is crazy bullshit? *mind explodes*

    --
    So basically, -1 troll/offtopic is really slashdots way of saying "I hate that you thought of something before me."
    1. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by bsDaemon · · Score: 5, Funny

      no, no, no... the proper term is GNU/Anchor Baby.

    2. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by Midnight's+Shadow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He has TWO kids here? And he had those while NOT being a full american citizen? He had Anchor babies? Someone call FOX news please. We cannot have this filth just coming here and knocking out brats! Wait what? He is a constructive member of society? Hes already contributed to the American culture before he was a citizen? The entire idea of making immigration more difficult is crazy bullshit? *mind explodes*

      I realize you are being sarcastic but I would like to point out that he was here legally to begin with. Weird isn't it how some people can actually navigate the Byzantine immigration process instead of just sneaking across the boarder?

      --
      "God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh. " -Voltaire
    3. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is just one more reason we need to repeal the 14th Amendment! Nevermind the parts about Due Process and Equal Protection, or the fact that we're ALL immigrants; we have to quash further immigration at any price!

    4. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by AltairDusk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Considering that he dealt with it enough to come here legally, remain here legally, and now become a citizen here legally despite his apparent frustration with the process I don't find it hard to blame those who just sneak across. If someone isn't willing to do it the right way perhaps they should reconsider how much they want to be here.

    5. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Chances are high that the only lawn he's mowed since arriving is his own.

      Chances are even higher than the guy mowing his lawn now doesn't have the same paperwork that Linus had before he became a citizen.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    6. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by Jaysyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Does that mean Jose can break the law by living here illegally?

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    7. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by causality · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Perhaps the "right way" is unavailable to some people.

      Then they can stay the fuck out! How hard is this to understand?

      I may disagree with a foreign country's immigration policy. I might really, very strongly, in the most heartfelt way disagree with a foreign country's immigration policy. I might think they're a bunch of jackasses for having such a policy. None of that gives me the right to break their laws.

      I would imagine the process of getting a green card was a lot easier for Linus Torvalds than it would be for some random Jose Gonzales with not so much as a high school degree.

      Coincidentally, highly educated and highly skilled people from Finland aren't causing the USA's illegal immigration problem.

      You might as well complain that people who have not so much as a high school degree have a really difficult time becoming brain surgeons. Horrible discrimination, that is.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    8. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does that mean Jose can break the law by living here illegally?

      All evidence suggests that, yes, he can do so quite easily.

    9. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by causality · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If someone isn't willing to endure a process that provides no guarantees and is instead willing to risk it all to come here, then they should reconsider how much they want to be here. Yeah that makes sense.

      Because clearly I am entitled to immigrate to any country I please. Therefore, because of my entitlement, any immigration laws that wouldn't let me move to that country are flawed and should be flippantly ignored rather than respected as reflecting the intent of a soverign nation. It's all about me, baby, and anything that interferes with what I want to do is wrong even if that means breaking the laws and trespassing on the foreign soil of a nation that doesn't owe me anything. Because I take up space and breathe oxygen I get to be anywhere, even where I'm clearly not wanted and even against the wishes of those who rightfully live there.

      Signed,
      Jose

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    10. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The illegal immigration problem isn't nearly as bad as the puppets directed by the Koch would have you believe.

      What you fail to understand is that people who come here illegal know it's illegal but living here under the radar is the best alternative they have.

      If going to Canada illegally was the only way I could a minimum scratch level of a life for my family, I would break their migration laws. So would you.

      It's not about rights, or illegality. It's about surviving. Once the US congress realizes that the sooner we can crter a better way to deal with the issue.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Excuse me, I am unaware of any group that has a problem with legal immigrants. Most of the people I have seen who have a problem with illegal immigrants favor reducing the difficulty of legally immigrating into this country while increasing the enforcement against illegal immigration.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    12. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      no, no, no... the proper term is GNU/Anchor Baby.

      Don't you mean he forked two child processes while in the USofA? Linus spawns child processes not anchor babies. Hand in your GNU Citizenship card. ;)

    13. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I were an US leader standing across from Mexican delegation, this is what I'd ask them "Aren't you embarrassed about how many people are fleeing your country?"

      It should be embarrassing and shameful.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    14. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by causality · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The lazy ones *do* stay the fuck out. It is the hard-working ones who try repeatedly to get into the country. To work hard, better their family, improve our cities and economy, and pay our Social Security taxes. Would it be a such a terrible thing to give people a way to do this good work legally? Bad laws reward bad behavior. Good laws reward good behavior. Our current immigration policy is one of the worst laws we have.

      The second they break our laws to be here they demonstrate a belief that we owe them something. We don't. It's that simple.

      An analogy can be made to your private residence. It doesn't matter if I'm the nicest most hard-working guy in the world. If you tell me that I am not welcome in your home, I don't get to stay there against your wishes because I think I should be allowed to. The term for that is trespassing. The fact that I'm willing to do your yardwork and landscaping doesn't override your wishes as the homeowner. If you think my work is valuable and decide to allow me on premises, you may do so, but I don't have the right to demand that you make that decision.

      It's the same thing when a sovereign nation decides who is and is not welcome in their territory and on what terms they may be there. The problem lies in the people who don't respect its wishes and break its laws. Any good traits they have like paying taxes or doing work is completely irrelevant. I don't have the right to break the immigration laws of a sovereign nation no matter how great of a person I think I may be.

      Furthermore, it's completely pathological to insist on being where you're not wanted.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    15. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by ultranova · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the goal of a country's immigration policy is to provide foreigners with a better life (a laughable notion but that's what you seem to be saying)

      "Give us your poor, your tired, your huddled masses longing to be free..."

      It was this notion that built the most powerful country on the Earth. It's abandoning it that has caused said country to decline. People trying to improve their lot usually end up improving plenty of other people's lot too; the worse off they were to begin with, the more driven they are. What the heck happened to you to forget that? Megacorps?

      Bloody Hell! I can understand selfish psychopaths - and will argue with them from the understanding that they only care of themselves - but I'll never, ever, understand people who are acting against their own interests, despite presumably being intelligent enough to understand them.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    16. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by StayFrosty · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are the ones who will contribute most to our economy and pay for your and my social security when we retire

      This is so ridiculous I am undoing moderation to reply.

      First of all I'd rather my children be contributing to the economy and social security when I retire. There is no shortage of American workers in the US right now. In fact there is a surplus. Putting these people to work will do more for our economy than hiring illegals. Not only will unemployment be lower but the cost of unemployment, food stamps and other welfare benefits payed to currently unemployed or underemployed Americans will decrease. It could even help raise wages for low-paying jobs as Americans (or legal immigrants) aren't as likely to live in unsafe conditions just to save a few bucks.

      You are also forgetting the burden illegal immigrants put on our welfare system. Since they often work for low wages and live below the poverty line they qualify for all sorts of benefits. In Wisconsin they get excellent health care (better than my current employment benefits and they pay nothing for it), housing assistance, heating assistance, food stamps, etc... all on the American taxpayer's dime. Interestingly it seems that these programs were tailored for illegal immigrants as you do not need a social security number to qualify--meaning you don't have to be paying taxes to get the benefits.

      As someone whose job was displaced by illegal immigrants I don't believe that Americans would not do the same work as illegals. I was paying my way through school by working on a farm on weekends and over the summers. Pretty soon the farmer hired a few illegal immigrants to work week nights. Within 6 months he had hired 4 more and my hours went from 30/week to about 4. Why? The illegals were willing to work for minimum wage and I couldn't. I have a few unemployed friends who would be more than willing to work on a farm or something similar for $8-$10 an hour just so they can get by. None of them can find work because all the farms around are only hiring illegals these days.

      --
      "Frequently wrong, never in doubt."
    17. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by Americano · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I dated a Brazilian girl a few years ago who was here illegally, and it certainly gave me a lot more sympathy for the situation our immigration laws put some people in. She came here legally (I believe on a student visa - she was a journalist back in Minas Gerais, and was here for some sort of communications program at a college near Boston), got a job to cover expenses while she was here, and ended up pregnant by an American guy. When the visa expired, she stayed. I never inquired too closely how she was able to keep her job after the visa expired, as it seemed to me the corporation she worked for should have had the resources to track these sorts of things.

      So now, she's sort of stuck between staying illegally and going home and leaving her child behind. The baby's father told her that he would never allow her to move back to Brazil with the baby, putting her in the position where she could choose to obey the law, or abandon her child. If she left the country to go back to Brazil even to visit, she would be denied re-entry because her visa had expired - meaning she couldn't even go home for her mother's funeral when her mother passed away.

      That our laws are putting people in this sort of a situation is fairly disturbing. I'm sure it's an unintended consequence, but it points to a problem that needs to be fixed.

      My opinion on what I'd consider a 'generally fair' system:
      1) Fine companies that hire illegals out of existence. Make it so painful to do so that no employer would ever consider it, and *enforce* that law, vigorously. It should be considered the next thing to human trafficking to hire somebody here, treat them like livestock, and pay them criminally low wages. The management chain from line manager all the way up to CEO should be held personally, criminally, responsible for failing to secure adequate documentation.
      2) Allow companies to sponsor workers from foreign countries to come here and work for them, under the following conditions:
                a) Prove that the job has been posted for some amount of time in the local markets, and that you've failed to find a qualified candidate;
                b) Pay prevailing market wages to anybody you hire, immigrant or local, for that job.
      3) Allow people to come here as long as they can demonstrate:
                a) They are being sponsored for a job by a company here, or have a job already here;
                b) -- OR -- they are a dependent of someone who is being sponsored or has a job already here;
      4) People entering on this jobs program must hold a job & be paying taxes (or be a dependent) in order to access public services - healthcare, education, driver's license, etc.etc.
      5) Break the law in a serious fashion (or multiple less-serious offenses), risk losing your job and being deported.

      A system like this would probably neuter about 80% of the "illegal immigrant" problem today. If there is no way to get a job other than through these methods, and the job is required to take advantage of public services, that will eliminate the lazy do-nothings from the queue. The remaining people who would want to come in illegally and undocumented would *probably* largely be the criminal element & security concerns - so you focus your attention on finding & stopping those people, rather than looking through a 30-million-person haystack for the 1 or 2 needles, or looking at rounding up the entire immigrant population and deporting them all.

    18. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by TheSync · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The second they break our laws to be here they demonstrate a belief that we owe them something.

      Tell that to Rosa Parks...

      Of course the truth is it isn't THEIR right to freedom of movement we should be most worried about, it is OUR economy they will improve, directly through their hard work and indirectly through the hard work of their progeny. One of their children could be the world's next Linus. It is unlikely their children could be the next Linus if their kid is born in a small town in Mexico.

    19. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I lived in Texas while a legal non-immigrant on a work visa.

      I had no trouble, and was missed when I had to return to Canada because of a lay off.

      Maybe it was my NRA membership.

      --
      In Liberty, Rene
    20. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by StayFrosty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      $8-$10 per hour plus minimal benefits, employment tax, workers comp. and reasonable working conditions is *way* more than most farmers are paying illegal immigrants.

      This was in 2004. I was making $6.50/hr. Minimum wage was $5.15. I had no benefits of any kind including workers comp as farm labor in Wisconsin was exempt at that time.

      My question to you is: If farmers aren't paying employment taxes, how is illegal labor going to pay for my social security as you stated in your previous post?

      The jobs you lost to illegals are still there, it just costs the farmer less to hire illegals than it costs to hire you, even at $8 per hour. The farmer is doing the natural, free-market thing and hiring the cheaper labor. The illegals are doing the natural free-market thing and taking the work. You could take the work too, but you'd have to lower your wage and expectations.

      I didn't have a choice. Like I said in the previous post the farmer just cut my hours to nothing. I ended up taking the pay cut by getting a different job that only paid minimum wage. I would have preferred to continue doing the farm work for minimum wage. My friend who has been looking for farm (and other unskilled) work lately isn't even considered for minimum-wage jobs of this type because he's here legally.

      We should realize cheap labor is exactly what we want and make it legal,

      I like cheap clothing. Should we legalize slavery to produce the cotton more cheaply? Should we legalize child labor so the mills can make more of a profit? I bet it that would be even cheaper than outsourcing our textile production to China or somewhere else where labor is cheap and human life isn't valued. My point is that government regulation is there to keep the free market in check. This is a good thing for laborers and consumers.

      instead of wasting effort criminalizing the very people providing the food we want for our families.

      Americans and legal immigrants are perfectly capable of producing this food without illegal immigration. My solution is to criminalize those who deliberately hire illegal workers--I'm talking jail time, not little fines. If there wasn't work, we wouldn't have the immigration problem. Wages (and probably prices) would go up a bit and unemployment would go down.

      --
      "Frequently wrong, never in doubt."
    21. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by toadlife · · Score: 2, Informative

      First of all I'd rather my children be contributing to the economy and social security when I retire.

      Illegal immigrants are bankrolling your SS right now.

      "Stephen C. Goss, the chief actuary of the Social Security Administration and someone who enjoys bipartisan support for his straightforwardness, said that by 2007, the Social Security trust fund had received a net benefit of somewhere between $120 billion and $240 billion from unauthorized immigrants.

      That represented an astounding 5.4 percent to 10.7 percent of the trust fund's total assets of $2.24 trillion that year. The cumulative contribution is surely higher now. Unauthorized immigrants paid a net contribution of $12 billion in 2007 alone, Goss said. "

      SOURCE.

      The illegals were willing to work for minimum wage and I couldn't. I have a few unemployed friends who would be more than willing to work on a farm or something similar for $8-$10 an hour just so they can get by.

      Sounds like an more of a indictment of our countries ridiculously low minimum wage than anything else.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    22. Re:WOAH WOAH WOAH by russotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The difference is that those people weren't breaking our laws to be here.

      Of course they weren't breaking our laws to be here. We had an open immigration policy then. As long as you weren't a member of a disfavored race, anyway.

      The selfish ones are the people who insist on being here against our wishes.

      Who is this "our"? Do you own the land illegal immigrants are standing on?

  6. More importantly by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is Linus secretly from Kenya? I find his source code to be socialist and anti-colonialist.

    1. Re:More importantly by wsanders · · Score: 4, Funny

      Linus can get rid of the "Calvin Pissing on La Migra" sticker on his rear window. Or cover up "la Migra" with a BSD Devil.

      http://vehiclevinyls.com/estore/html/page-view.asp?menuid=4106&gotorec=40

      --
      Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    2. Re:More importantly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you use the Glenn Beck meme here, you can avoid being tagged flamebait.

      I just heard on the internet that {Person's name} {did something horrible}. Now, I'm not saying that {Person's name} {did something horrible}. But it does strike me as a little suspicious that {Person's name} has never denied {doing something horrible}. Really, I'm not accusing {Person's Name} of {doing something horrible}. But if {Person's name} didn't {do something horrible}, why hasn't he denied {doing something horrible}?

      For some reason, It's ok as long as you are making fun of the right here.

    3. Re:More importantly by Arancaytar · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have heard rumors that not only is Linus secretly Muslim, he is also secretly black.

    4. Re:More importantly by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2, Funny

      I heard Linus is secretly an ice bear!

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    5. Re:More importantly by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The right-wing is more acquainted with logic

      You lost me.

      "More acquainted" than whom? Everyone else? Does "the right-wing" have some sort of monopoly on rational thought?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    6. Re:More importantly by llamapater · · Score: 3, Funny

      he has a penguin logo because as an ice bear that is his favorite food :p

    7. Re:More importantly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The nice thing about the Left is that they keep their loons on the fringe. The Right is currently embracing theirs.

    8. Re:More importantly by kgibbsvt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact that the likes of Glenn Beck, Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin are admired by the right wing is just about all you need to say about the right wing. - kg

    9. Re:More importantly by jgagnon · · Score: 2, Funny

      About the same time Michael Jackson did? :p

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    10. Re:More importantly by gwayne · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you EVER listened to what DR. Glenn Beck has to say? I've never heard him denounce Muslims or Islam in a derogatory context. This is the far left making such accusations. He's not a racist or Islam-aphobe. He frequently has guests from different backgrounds. He honored the work of MLK for an entire week or so, having his daughter (I think) as a guest.

      Beck is not preaching hate. He has simply connected the dots to show all Americans that the federal government, and particularly the Democratic party, has been infested with Progressives, Socialists, Communists, Marxists, etc, leading our whole nation to no good end. The federal government is out of control. It has it's OWN agenda - not that of THE PEOPLE.

      How many Socialist/Communist regimes do we have to see fall to understand that they simply don't work.

      Beck advocates people to stand up for themselves, be responsible and self-sufficient -- to stop the government "entitlements" that chain people to wellfare and excessive government spending. That doesn't mean throwing people under the bus - it just means finding another way for them to earn a living, such as education and skills training programs, small business loans, etc. That isn't racism. It's common sense. You can't spend more than you earn -- just look at the debt crisis in America. The Progressives are trying to bury the U.S. economy in debt using the Cloward-Piven strategy. Current political issues are simply a side-show distraction while they continue to manipulate the country into failure. This is not good for any American, rich or poor, Republican, Democrat or other.

    11. Re:More importantly by ultranova · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For some reason, It's ok as long as you are making fun of the right here.

      It's because most of Slashdot works for a living. Right is for the owning class, left is for the working class. Unfortunately the left in most countries seems to be willing to work with the right for the latter's benefit, so I think I'll have to vote for Communists in the next election to retain at least a bit of my rights and freedoms.

      And no, the irony doesn't escape me.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    12. Re:More importantly by GauteL · · Score: 2, Informative

      "earned a PhD"?

      As far as I can tell (and please correct me) Glenn Beck was given an honorary PhD from a not very well renowned evangelical university. That is not the same as earning a PhD.

      To bring things slightly back on topic, far more deserving people, such as Linus Torvalds, have received honorary degrees from far more established universities (1 and 2).

      Yet, only pompous people, and certainly not Torvalds, would refer to themselves as Dr. on the basis of an honorary degree. Torvalds, who is educated to a Masters degree (unlike Beck), which in Scandinavia used to be quite close to some countries' PhD, knows better.

    13. Re:More importantly by Dhalka226 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not really "not impacting us and improving our economy," now is it?

      Not really, no. It's just because you're caught up in 12 billion being a really big number, which it is. For some perspective, it's around 1%[1] of the budget just for the federal Department of Education and about one third of one percent of the total federal budget. For comparison, illegal immigrants would be somewhere in the vicinity of 3.5% of the population and about 6.8% of the school population[2], so it seems to me that they're even under-represented in your sample. Most education funding does not come from the federal level, so its impact is actually even smaller than that.

      Illegal immigrants in total are estimated to number about 11 million[3]. Even if they don't pay taxes (which I'm not defending, merely removing from the calculation for ease) do you really believe that they don't spend $1000 per person per year on average into our economy? Because if they do, they've already paid more in economic gains than we've lost in tax dollars spent educating their children. Children who are not responsible for the immigration status of their parents or themselves, by the way. It may be "leftist" of me to consider what effect these things may have on the lives of innocent children who will, in all probability, grow up to be tax-paying American adults and further work to repay their education costs, but I'm perfectly okay with that.

      Of course, unless you're claiming that they are all thieves they are also paying other taxes even if they're not paying income taxes. If they're living somewhere other than under a bridge, they're either paying property taxes or rent that goes, in part, toward paying property taxes -- the main source of funding for schools. They're paying sales taxes and fuel taxes and buying things from those stores and restaurants that employ all those nice white people.

      I'm not claiming that there aren't other expenses other than educating illegal immigrants. There will be health care costs and economic opportunity costs, among other things. I am stating that even if they create a deficit in terms of taxes paid versus burdens imposed on government, they may very well still be a net positive economic factor, even without factoring in the children of illegal immigrants who are now American citizens and will contribute positively in their lives to a very similar or identical extent as other Americans. Especially if we give them things like education so they're not forced to live the same conditions as their illegal immigrant parents.

      Honestly, if I asked you how much illegal immigrants contributed economically would you know? Could you even give me an educated guess? Isn't it the exact opposite of your argument that they're an economic drain on society? Facts are great, but if you're claiming to make your decisions based solely on the facts you should have all of them -- including the ones that go against your own argument. Otherwise it's nothing more than emotion concealed as facts.

      For what it's worth, I reject your implied argument that the only proper way of evaluating the situation is economics even though I think "lefties" could make a really strong case on that basis as well. Emotions and humanity may not be quantifiable, but they're certainly logical. In fact so much so that taking care of one another is practically hard-coded in our DNA; it's why we form societies and have instincts to take care of the weak to begin with. You're begging the question that they're one in the same or that anything that can't be measured is without (logical) value.

      [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_the_United_States
      [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_impact_of_illegal_immigrants_in_the_United_States (the exact source you got your table from, it se

    14. Re:More importantly by billius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The right-wing is more acquainted with logic and therefore less likely to start frothing at the mouth and looking for a way to silence the speaker (however underhanded or childish) in response to any perceived slight or insult. It's part of why Glenn Beck may be admired or respected among right-leaning people for so long as his views make sense to them, but he is not the Messianic savior that many leftists seem to think Obama is.

      Which is why Glenn Beck has an online "university," was able to get thousands of people to attend a rally with to "restore America's honor" and "take back the Civil Rights Movement" and has millions of adoring fans who tune in to watch him scream, rant, play his weird word games on the chalkboard and cry? Or why Bill O'reilly has books for children? I am always puzzled by people who seem to think that one political "wing" is composed entirely of mature, intelligent people who have thought out their positions and the other is made of emotional, illogical sheep. The unfortunate truth is that there are a lot of people from the latter category in both parties. I *wish* that the problem was just one party, but unfortunately that's not true. Some people were cynical enough to vote for Obama just because of his race, others were naive enough to believe he was some kind of messiah, but some of us didn't want to vote for a 72 year-old cancer survivor who might die and leave us with President Palin *shudders* nor vote for someone who had basically sold out everything they believed in on the campaign trail (although all candidates do at least a little selling out).

    15. Re:More importantly by norminator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just because he offers the "Glenn Beck University" to people who pony up to join his fan club doesn't mean he is a Dr. in any sense of the word.

      Glenn Beck puts forward some good concepts, like truth, integrity, hard work, and believing in America. Unfortunately, he is also a liar and a hypocrite who uses most of the immoral smear tactics that he accuses his enemies of using.

      I don't read HuffPo or Media Matters, and I don't watch the Daily Show or the Colbert Report. I actually listen to Beck's radio show so that I know what appalling stuff he's saying. Occasionally I see parts of his TV show (although I really don't like having his face on display in my house), and I'm usually pretty shocked at what he gets away with saying.

      I listened to his astonishment at what a racist Shirley Sherrod is, and how no human should treat people like she was treating those poor white farmers, then for two weeks after that, he and his buddies talked about how she should thank him for defending her, and how ungrateful she was, while he rode his high horse all over TV claiming that he "happens to believe that context matters".

      Have you ever watched his show on Net Neutrality? He doesn't actually talk about Net Neutrality, he strings together a bunch of "Marxist" plots with little to no basis in reality, and says they're what Net Neutrality is all about.

      A few weeks ago I was flipping through channels and saw him talk about a patent that Fannie Mae supposedly has for an outlet cover that can only be removed with a special tool, and how that's a part of the cap & trade agenda and this progressive administration wants to put them in your house. I literally felt dumber for having seen it, because it makes so little sense in the real world -- but that was part of how he provokes outrage: "Can you believe they're trying to do this?" Then, after doing further research, I found out that patent expired in 2007 and was never renewed. Also, it was developed by an in-house electrician based on work he had done to protect the computers in the offices of Fannie Mae. The patent makes no mention whatsoever of residential applications.

      Your Doctor is a quack. Better get a second opinion (and not from someone educated by Glenn Beck University), before he gets you seriously sick. We'd probably all be better off with Bovine University.

    16. Re:More importantly by dbIII · · Score: 2, Funny

      The right wing is more acquainted with logic

      It's not enough to wave at logic when you pass it in the street. It's far better to employ it.

  7. OTOH, there's jury duty... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've thought of it myself (given I've had a green card here for a while), but it seems every second week someone is off for jury duty over here. Back in the UK, the only person I know who was called was my dad, once, in 45 years as an adult.

    Personally, I'm not sure the whole 'WooHoo, I can now vote in the US' is worth it - which seems to be the only other *practical* difference between a GC-holder, and a citizen.

    Plus, IIRC, the US insist that I'd have to give up my UK citizenship/passport (although, from various friends, I've heard that the UK just send your passport back to you with a "you appear to have misplaced your passport" note :)

    So, whatever floats your boat, Linus, but I don't think it's for me.

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:OTOH, there's jury duty... by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, jury duty is important.

      Smart people are smart enough to get out of jury duty if they want to, but ask yourself: if falsely accused of a crime, wouldn't I want someone on the jury to be at least as smart as me?

    2. Re:OTOH, there's jury duty... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, what I actually don't understand is why he went to live in the states. I mean, he's from fucking Finland. It's a fucking awesome country, and it's surrounded by Sweden (Tits), Norway (Awesomest place on earth, full of church-burners), and Russia (Best women on earth). So, he left an amazing country with a huge cultural heritage and an educated population in Europe, to go the New Rome, land of mcdonalds? That sounds like a stupid move to me.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    3. Re:OTOH, there's jury duty... by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course, most people charged with a crime actually did it, and in those cases, the defense's motivation is to get people on the jury who are even stupider than the defendant.

    4. Re:OTOH, there's jury duty... by bsDaemon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, he left to go to the United States, land of companies willing to pay him for working on things related to his hobby, because large segments of the economy have become dependent on him. Last I heard, wasn't he living in Oregon? You sounds like your judging the entire country based on Kansas.

    5. Re:OTOH, there's jury duty... by geekoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Smart? I want someone who can look at the facts and recognize outside bias when it presents itself.

      Smart doesn't cut it alone.

      And yes, Jury duty is critical to the system. I think there should be a tax right off for Jury duty.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  8. He can do whatever he wants... by Qubit · · Score: 2, Funny

    In that post he also expresses dislike for the American style of politics in which he will now be able to participate directly."

    ...but just don't email the POTUS and call him a p***k!

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
  9. So, now he's ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    to have his BMI and IQ numbers interchanged.

  10. Re:The Real American System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The US has this thing called "voting". It's not just about the 4 year change of president, there's a huge amount that can be voted on locally, particularly on local positions in govt, school boards, firecheif, sheriff etc. As a tax payer, you have no say, as a citizen, you can get involved.

  11. Matti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Tekemätöntä ei saa tekemättömäksi" -- Matti Nykänen

  12. Re:Welcome Aboard by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, I'd say welcome aboard, and wonder any more why anyone would want to do that, with the country rushing headlong toward socialism and therefore an impending economic collapse. We have all the making of a disaster that will dwarf the Great Depression, and there doesn't seem to be much of anyone who wants to do anything about it.

    Amazing. Just three years ago, people were saying how they couldn't imagine why anyone would want to come to a country rushing headlong into fascism and therefore an impending social collapse, with all the making of a disaster that would dwarf McCarthyism, and that there didn't seem to be much of anyone who wanted to do anything about it.

    The only conclusion I can draw is that both sides are wrong, and/or both sides are right. In any case, if we were doing something so terribly wrong Over Here, I can't imagine why we'd still be attracting so many folks from Over There.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  13. Re:Welcome Aboard by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Comments like this wish that this was filed under politics.
    2. Dude he is from Finnland. I doubt that he feels the US is rushing toward socialism.

    Other than that welcome to the list of great Americans that includes Albert Einstein and Alexander Gram Bell.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  14. Re:Welcome Aboard by rotide · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Right, it's "socialism" that's hurting our county. Not the constant erosion of citizens rights, nope. Not the constant and gratuitous government spending. Not the off-shoring of nearly all our industry because we'd rather have a cheaper item regardless of the human cost overseas. Not the constant War-State mentality where we have to fight "Terrorism", "Drugs", "Copyright", etc, etc, and again, pay for it. Not the fact that our country is basically being run _by_ corporations _for_ corporations (heavy lobbying).

    No, it's the thought that maybe, just maybe, some of the spending government does should actually help _citizens_ that's hurting us.

    Seriously?

    P.S. Sorry for the OT comment. I just get so tired of hearing this BS Glenn Beck inspired bullshit.

  15. Oh stop by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are trying to make an issue where there isn't one. Torvalds was here legally, he had his green card. You can live in the US permanently and never get citizenship, legally, if you wish to.

    Thus far I have yet to encounter someone trying to make an issue of people who are legal permanent residents. You seem to be building a straw man ot pick a fight where there is not one.

    When you start shouting and being absurd just to start a fight you are no better than those you are trying to attack.

    1. Re:Oh stop by Kufat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please learn to recognize sarcasm. This wasn't even a difficult one; the second line of the GP made it clear that the first line was said in jest!

    2. Re:Oh stop by confused+one · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You beat me to it. My mother never applied for U.S. citizenship. She lived here for 35 years before she went home to care for her elderly mother. Now, my father, a U.S. citizen, lives overseas. These things happen and it's not a big deal.

  16. Re:Welcome Aboard by rotide · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't consider government funding of private/public businesses socialism. That's just a feedback loop due to corporate lobbying, in my mind at least. A "we'll help fill your pockets if you fill ours and also make us CEO's and/or some other high paid employees afterward" sort of deal.

  17. Atleast he plans to vote by HockeyPuck · · Score: 3, Funny

    In the last US presidential election only about 60% of the people eligible to vote, actually did. However, I bet a much greater number of people complained about the president/candidates. I remember reading somewhere that even though Hollywood (Puff Daddy etc..) started the whole "Vote of Die" campaign to get young people (age 18-24) to vote, approximately 1 in 10 actually did.

    I always tell people, if you didn't vote in in the election, don't complain.

    1. Re:Atleast he plans to vote by jonescb · · Score: 2

      Apparently you haven't listened to George Carlin. You can't blame the people who didn't vote because they weren't the ones who picked the awful politician who is screwing everything up. The people who don't vote can blame the ones who did. And really, in most elections both mainstream candidates are awful, so voting is mostly a waste of time. The ones who don't vote have all the right to blame the ones who do for propagating such a terrible system.

    2. Re:Atleast he plans to vote by kindbud · · Score: 3, Funny

      I always tell people, if you didn't vote in in the election, don't complain.

      And I always tell people, if you voted in the last election, it's all your fault.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
  18. Re:The Real American System by mlts · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The US is lucky in one respect: Unlike most of Europe where citizens 18-20 have to go into the army or other duty for two years, US citizens really only have two duties: Jury duty and voting. No, there is no law forcing people to the polls, but by not voting, people are letting people who are likely dumber than themselves, or the lobbyists and their ad firms behind the attack ads decide the election.

    If you are a US citizen, vote. If you like neither candidate, write someone in. It doesn't matter what side you are on, just go, do your research for the candidates, and go vote. /rant.

  19. Re:Welcome Aboard by burnin1965 · · Score: 3, Interesting
  20. Re:Welcome Aboard by east+coast · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not the constant erosion of citizens rights, nope. Not the constant and gratuitous government spending. Not the off-shoring of nearly all our industry because we'd rather have a cheaper item regardless of the human cost overseas. Not the constant War-State mentality where we have to fight "Terrorism", "Drugs", "Copyright", etc, etc, and again, pay for it.

    Well, in all fairness, Neither side is willing to do anything about all of that either.

    I just get so tired of hearing this BS major party inspired bullshit.

    Fixed that for you. It's already pretty easy to see that both sides are pretty much doing the same thing but using different excuses as to why they do it. Why bother acting like this is a right wing vs left wing problem? The powers that be, regardless of their party, have a common goal and, unless you're one of their power elite, you're not included on the winning side of things. Anyone following a major party at this point is fodder to the parties' leadership and a betrayer of the country's citizens.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  21. Re:Welcome Aboard by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, to be fair, the Soviet Union had constant and gratuitous government spending, an erosion of citizens rights, and a constant war-state mentality. Socialism with the Big S is generally not the same thing as Social Democracy. The "Socialism" of Western Europe was Social Democracy, not the Socialism of the red flags; the Marxist "Scientific Socialism" of the Internationale that most people call Communism today. Except the people who think they're being cleaver and claim that "pure communism" was supposed to be Libertarian Socialism, aka "Anarchism." it wasn't. Mikhail Bakunin and Karl Marx were arch-rivals in the First Internationale over this issue, and Marxism, slightly refined by Lenin and Trotsky, and established by the Bolsheviks in the Soviet Union was the real McCoy.

  22. Citizenship Test by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 5, Funny

    Quizzer: what are the three branches of government?

    Linus: Why have three branches? I'd do a git merge legislative executive judiciary into a single monolithic government over which I'm benevolent dictator. Screw those crazy microgovernment people!

  23. Re:The Real American System by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unlike most of Europe where citizens 18-20 have to go into the army or other duty for two years

    I call bullshit. Please enumerate this list that encompasses "most of Europe" that has such a requirement.

  24. Re:Welcome Aboard by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Informative

    Except what you describe is crony capitalism not socialism.

  25. Re:The Real American System by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Voting really doesn't mean shit with a universal "right" to vote and a lack of limited government.

    I'd wager that for every informed vote that gets cast there are 5 votes by people who don't even know what they are voting for but vote automatically for a republican/democrat because thats what they've always voted for.

    Hell, my guess is there are even more people who vote who were just told by their union who to vote for and they do it.

    Democracy is a good thing, but it only works with informed voters along with limited government. Otherwise, its no better than mob justice.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  26. moron. by unity100 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    he retains his finnish citizenship. had you known zit about the life standards and amenities in finland, you would go crying in a corner.

    http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/

    ignorant people like you are easy to keep in servitude by getting fed the bullshit that is 'greatest nation on earth'. good going !!

    1. Re:moron. by halivar · · Score: 3, Funny

      I heard Finn's live in giant wooden shoes, which seems kind of cool. They also fought back the Soviets with nothing but live fish for ammunition, so they've also got huge balls. I would like to marry a Finnish girl, maybe, but I would be intimidated trying to explain to her father why I'd be a worthy son-in-law when I have never, in fact, raided the English coast. Yeah, Norfinswedewayland sounds like an awesome place.

  27. Immigration. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I married my wife overseas. Barely a month later we started preparing paperwork for her green card. It was a relatively effortless process. Going from green card to citizen was just as trivial, although it wasn't cheap and got even more expensive shortly after we applied. Often times it comes down to the individual you're dealing with. We have friends who were in a similar situation, but were married longer, and they had to deal with a jerk who gave them a hard time, partly due to them having a baby. But the process was generally the same otherwise. But this is probably one of the easier ways to immigrate.

    On the other hand, an uncle of mine wanted to come to the US with his family and had to wait 7 years before he got the papers. There was a ton of paperwork, some expense and having to deal with lotteries to get a place in line. Part of the reason for this is because of people who come here illegally. Illegals aren't only coming from Mexico. It's relatively trivial to get a visitor's visa and just not go back. In certain communities it's not that difficult to get fake paperwork.

    From what I've seen it's actually a lot easier to immigrate to the US than it is to immigrate to most countries. And, the US is far, far less restrictive about what you can do when you're here. In some countries, on a work visa you can't even get a mobile phone. You have to purchase one under a citizen's name. Good luck trying to buy a car and getting it registered, or owning property.

    But too many people, Americans ironically, are intent on perpetuating this notion that America is hostile to foreigners. Foreign immigration, unlike anywhere else in the world comprises the backbone of the country. That said, I have no sympathy for illegal immigration. Countless people have made the effort to go through the process legally. And we have this huge group of people who have decided they don't want to deal with those hassles. So instead, they open themselves up to exploitation, both from those helping them across the border and those who ultimately decide to employee them in the States.

    Even more offensive is the suggestion by many that we should accept illegal immigration and that we're bigots by not doing so. We can't deport those already here. We have to give them green cards. But, it should have a few conditions. First, they have to have clean records and they have to be able to find work. Secondly, depending on age, they have to learn a reasonable level of English within a few years. I don't think that's unreasonably at all. But also important, and this should happen first, the borders have to be closed. Build a proper wall and put national guard troops along the border. And the Mexican border isn't the sole problem. Employers who hire illegals need to be dealt with harshly. Not just fined, they should be put out of business. Period. We need to deter illegal immigration as much as possible while embracing legal immigration.

    Torvalds did it the right way.

  28. Re:ahaha ahaha by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 2

    had you known shit about finnish citizenship and the life in finland, you would eat your words about that 'monolithic single government'

    This is why the world is unfair. You have a lower UID than me, yet failed to get an obviously-about-Linux joke. On Slashdot. Please turn in your geek card at the door.

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  29. You appear to be misinformed by Calibax · · Score: 2, Informative

    Neither the UK nor the USA require that you renounce your UK citizenship when you take US citizenship. See http://travel.state.gov/travel/cbpmc/cbpmc_2223.html and http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/britishcitizenship/dualnationality.

    In fact, until 2002 there was no way to give up British citizenship - now you can get a form from the British embassy, fill it in and send it to the UK government. It doesn't even have to be permanent as you can reacquire your UK citizenship by filling in another form and sending that one in.

    There is one good reason to become a US citizen - to protect your social security pension. If you have spent (or expect to spend) a significant number of years in the USA, enough to be eligible for a US pension (40 credits = 10 years, as I recall) then you might want to protect your investment in the social security system i.e. the 6.2% of your income you have paid and continue to pay. However, in my view, that's certainly not the only good reason to be a citizen of the USA if you have permanently moved here.

    I've been a US citizen for some years now and have never been called for jury duty.

  30. Re:The Real American System by Marcika · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unlike most of Europe where citizens 18-20 have to go into the army or other duty for two years

    I call bullshit. Please enumerate this list that encompasses "most of Europe" that has such a requirement.

    Not most, but about half, not all citizens, but only men, not for two years but only 6 to 12 months. However, the list includes: Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Norway, Finland, Greece, Denmark and Serbia

  31. Re:The Real American System by ACS+Solver · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't suppose you're European, as your statement on conscription in Europe is blatantly false. Most European countries have abolished conscription. Austria has military service that lasts less than a year, Albania is in the process of abolishing conscription, Finnish service is 6-12 months. Norwegian service is a year and German service is 6 months. Oh yeah and Greeks have a 9 month draft. Hell, Ukraine is schedules to end its mandatory military service program.

    I probably forgot a couple countries but certainly most do not have mandatory military service, and I'm not sure if there's any country remaining with a mandatory 2 year service. Which is certainly a good thing in my understanding.

  32. Dear Linus by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 4, Funny

    May I please have your spot in Finland, since you're no longer using it?

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  33. Re:Linus for President! by jgagnon · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, but he could become governor of California, though...

    --
    Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
  34. Re:Welcome Aboard by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fine, let's make things as simple as possible. "True" socialism is collective ownership of means of production. So long as you can privately own a factory in your country, it's not socialistic.

  35. Re:Jump off the racing horse, get on the donkey by vlm · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was going to say "But Finland has much higher taxes!" Then I checked... the highest tax bracket there is 30%.

    You've been misinformed. Not a quantitative error but a process error.

    True, their income tax is only about 1/3. But....

    In the us, we (mostly?) have low sales tax, no VAT, and high income taxes.

    In finland, their "sales tax" aka V.A.T. is roughly 1/4, although lower for some things. I specifically remember books had a relatively low VAT, only like 10%.

    So, if you're a wage slave, spending about what you earn, your total tax burden in finland is well over 60% by the time you add sin taxes and such. I suppose if you don't own a car or drink or smoke or earn much money it might only be 40% or so.

    Similar amusements happen in the USA, where some places use income tax, some use sales tax, and some use property tax to fund their operations.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  36. Re:Welcome Aboard by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the Wikipedia.
    "Bell was a British subject throughout his early life in Scotland and later in Canada until 1882, when he became a naturalized citizen of the United States. In 1915, he characterized his status as: "I am not one of those hyphenated Americans who claim allegiance to two countries."

    Alexander Gram Bell was an American by choice.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  37. Re:ahaha ahaha by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I guess you really didn't git it, did you?

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  38. Re:ahaha ahaha by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's something wrong in your kernel. Please reinstall and configure whoooosh.c and try again.

  39. Re:The Real American System by oxygene2k2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's 11 countries of geographic Europe, which covers 46 countries, so that's not "about half", but "less than a quarter".

    Taking only the EU countries into account, your list of 11 shrinks to 5 (Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Switzerland, Norway, and Serbia aren't part of the EU), while there are 27 EU countries (one of them, Cyprus, outside geographic Europe). That's less than a fifth.