Slashdot Mirror
Boeing Teams To Offer Spaceflight Trips
coondoggie writes "Aerospace giant Boeing and outer space tourism proprietors Space Adventures teamed up today to offer low Earth orbit (LEO) flight services onboard Boeing's future commercial crew spacecraft. Under this agreement, Space Adventures will market passenger seats on commercial flights aboard the Boeing Crew Space Transportation-100 (CST-100) spacecraft. Boeing's CST-100, which is under development, can hold seven and is bigger than NASA's Apollo orbiter but smaller than NASA's Orion."
Does this count as an international flight? And if so, are alcoholic beverages included in the ticket price?
If you gonna do it, do it in style. Die in a homebuild rocket dragged behind a homebuild submarine.
10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then
I wonder how long it'll take before the 'cheap-o' airlines get wind of this and squash 50 people in the same space.
like a lot of things, getting off the planet will start off as an exotic fad for the ridiculously rich. as a scientist, I'm disgusted... but it's probably the only realistic option for progress on this front.
new sig
Crews of up to seven, not seven passengers, if that's what you're wondering.
Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
Great - you can look at the control panels or get farted on by the mission commander while attempting to look out a window smaller than a laptop screen. Unless you're going somewhere or have a view - forget it.
Oddly the $18 million dollar contract NASA is giving them to help develop this concept is likely less money than they earned from one shuttle launch.
Now that competition has started in the launch business maybe we can get some real cost savings. All it took was the administration of a Socialist Fascist Kenyan native (or so I'm told by Fixed News)
Yeah, until you actually have a product, I won't believe it. I wonder how many people still have reservations on TWA's moon-shuttle vehicle that they were promoting back in 1969.
I've seen this statement made in several places:
The Democrats don't think free enterprise works below the sky, and the Republicans don't think it works above.
It amazes me to see a huge number of Republicans advocate for a central bureaucratic government authority with massive taxpayer subsidies and increased federal authority with the current Democratic presidential administration that is advocating for the elimination of federal bureaucracies, privatization of government services, and elimination of subsidies.
For myself, I think privatization of spaceflight is a very good thing, and it can only mean better things for America in the future. NASA isn't going anywhere, but they are no longer going to be a transportation service provider.... being Amtrack in space. Thank goodness too, as this is something that has been long overdue.
And yet, it is the neo-cons that fight against allowing private fixed costs space to take over on the launches. Yet, it is private cost plus space that has been doing the launches since the start.
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
For myself, I think privatization of spaceflight is a very good thing, and it can only mean better things for America in the future. NASA isn't going anywhere, but they are no longer going to be a transportation service provider.... being Amtrack in space. Thank goodness too, as this is something that has been long overdue.
Main reason I think people are angry about the privatization is that, ignoring the anger about loss of pork which is probably a huge amount of it, it's probably because people don't know what NASA does other than "send people to space."
Once private spaceflight gets much more prevalent and self sufficient, expect lawmakers to stupidly say that NASA is useless and should be shut down.
Story is short on details. What kind of rocket? Solid or liquid propellant? Etc. It only show a picture of an Apollo-like capsule.
it's like the old days all in the high ticket price no price line low prices
That Apollo-like capsule -is- the CST-100.
Here's a concept computer animation for you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mn_gXEK5XmQ
Wiki sez that it can sit on top of a Atlas V, Delta IV, or Falcon 9 rocket.
----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
Once private spaceflight gets much more prevalent and self sufficient, expect lawmakers to stupidly say that NASA is useless and should be shut down.
Well said here. I agree that there will be people questioning what NASA is doing... and there already are some who "get it" in terms of seeing a group like Boeing fly up to a private space station that may cost less than a billion dollars for constructing a station 2x the size of the ISS and paying for the complete vehicle development cost & assembly. NASA doesn't seem to be able to clear their throat for less than a billion dollars.
I do know that NASA does much more than just fly people into space, and I hope they get back to that as their primary mission. Restoring NASA to a role similar to how the NACA used to work would be a much better use of government resources.
All it took was the administration of a Socialist Fascist Kenyan native (or so I'm told by Fixed News)
Or so I've been told by Obama himself...repeatedly...
I actually saw a video the other day with Obama giving a speech when he was a US Senator. This isn't the same video I saw the other day. In the speech he clearly tells his story of how lucky he is to be a Kenyan born US American. So according to President Obama himself, he has committed fraud and does not legally qualify for the position he now holds. Again, that's from Obama himself. Obviously at the time, he had never considered running of presidency, else he wouldn't have made such a comment on video.
This is not the video I originally saw either. I looked quickly but couldn't find it. In the original video, it looks like he's giving a town hall speech and he's surrounded by the audience, like the first video up top. In that video, he squarely states he's Kenyan born and how wonderful American is that he's able to have reached his position.
Bluntly, Obama is a liar and has committed a huge fraud against America.
Anyone who thinks Obama qualifies for Presidency has been duped. Obama does not qualify for the position of US President - according to Obama himself! Seriously, Obama himself says he's a Kenyan and seems to have a hard time remembering his own lies.
I think its sad that American's first black president doesn't qualify and has dishonored the title President. Likely its not been dishonored as such since Nixon was in office.
The government sponsored technology research that NASA does to put things above the sky helps private industry thrive below the sky. Private space companies who want to make a quick buck probably won't do interesting research with great private industry payoffs in the long term.
The practice of soaking the rich for exorbitantly-priced luxury goods/services in order to fund technological progress is one of my favorite features of capitalism. They become less rich and I get affordable cool shit several years down the road.
Well, considering its Boeing, I'd venture a guess that its going to be one of the two vehicles they provide with ULA, their joint venture with Lockheed. Both the Atlas and Delta rocket families are liquid cores. Whether or not any solid boosters are involved will depend on the LV and mass (heavy configurations of Atlas require solid boosters, while the Delta IV heavy has two additional liquid boosters, although smaller Deltas have solid boosters as well).
But really, LV's are done and known. They need to be man-rated (a much fuzzier concept than many people think), but they're not vaporware. A specific capsule is not necessarily tied to a specific launch vehicle. Think of it as a question of commodity computers (mix-and-match capsule and LV) vs. Apple computers (integrated solution like the Space Shuttle).
Now, I would like to see significant work on a capsule besides some animations before I get too excited. But its not unreasonable to expect this to go somewhere.
The phrase is "native-born American." The Supreme Court has determined that this includes someone who is born of American parents abroad. Next?
"He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
The edit cuts are so bad it's laughable. This is the video equivalent of a ransom note with the words cut from a magazine. Even Breitbart isn't that crass in his editing.
I have something in common with Stephen Hawking...