Slashdot Mirror


Security a Concern As HTML5 Advances

Trailrunner7 writes "Every technology innovation has its coming out party, and Google Inc.'s recent 'dancing balls' logo experiment was widely interpreted as a high-impact debut for HTML5. But web security experts are warning that the sprawling new web standard may favor functionality over security, enabling a new generation of powerful web-based attacks. They agree that there are security enhancements in HTML5, but all expressed the same concern: that the new specification will greatly increase the 'attack surface' of HTML — providing more avenues by which malicious code can be delivered through the web. 'HTML5 has an enormous amount of functionality. The (specification) is just huge,' said Jeremiah Grossman of security firm WhiteHat. The breadth of the new specification gives him concern. 'I know that we're still finding vulnerabilities in HTML4,' Grossman said."

3 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I don't know about the rest of you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Standards are important but without fancy technology buzzwords I don't think the IT department would ever get funding.

  2. Not HTML5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google's "dancing balls" wasn't HTML5, it was divs, javascript and CSS border radius.

  3. How can HTML4 be vulnerable? by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It doesn't even contain any code, being a markup language? It's not even Turing complete.

    [italic attribute="question"]Is this invented markup language of mine also vulnerable?[/italic]

    *shrug*

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!