Slashdot Mirror


New HRP-4 Humanoid Robots From Japan To Go On Sale

An anonymous reader writes "Kawada Industries and the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology have unveiled their new humanoid robot, HRP-4. The new humanoid stands 151cm tall and is much thinner than its predecessors. For Japan, HRP-4 is another step forward in creating useful mechanical workers to deal with a forthcoming shortage in the labor force and care for an aging population. HRP-4's creators expect to start selling the robot to universities and other research institutions as early as January 2011 for a price tag of $300,000, which is not that bad for a humanoid." The HRP-4s are a whole $100,000 cheaper than Willow Garage's PR2 (non-humanoid) robots, which became available earlier this month. The difference really adds up when building your robot army. Ron Moore could not be reached for comment.

157 comments

  1. Cue the sleazy wah wah guitar by hyades1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    On the whole, I think I'd rather hire an au pair girl.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Cue the sleazy wah wah guitar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      HRP-4. Hmm... HeRPes-simplex4? Scary. Don't think you can practice safe sex with this robot.

    2. Re:Cue the sleazy wah wah guitar by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      An excellent point, my friend. Safety first!

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    3. Re:Cue the sleazy wah wah guitar by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Yes, on the hole

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    4. Re:Cue the sleazy wah wah guitar by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      On the whole, I think I'd rather hire an au pair girl.

      if you're going to be slipping it to her, I rather agree. Otherwise I'd rather the robot. I don't have kids so all the chores that need doing are theoretically doable by robot, and it won't talk back.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  2. HRP, DRP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they have the HERP-4, where is the DERP-4?

  3. Not sure... by grub · · Score: 1


    $300K would buy a lot of RealDolls...

    Hm.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Not sure... by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but those "real dolls" would be a lot more fun if they'd actually move like a real woman. Plus, they won't clean the house or do the laundry. Women are good for a lot more than sex, you know.

      I doubt cuddling with a "real doll" while watching a non-pornographic movie would be very fun. And if all you want is sex, crack whores are better than any sex toys.

    2. Re:Not sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whooooooa Nelly, let me see if I got this straight - real women move??? Mine just sites there like a lump! I've been missing out...

    3. Re:Not sure... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Women are good for a lot more than sex, you know. Wait... what???

      And if all you want is sex, crack whores are better than any sex toys. Actually, the sex toys generally smell a lot better and carry fewer diseases. Mmmmm... plastic! But I agree, I can't understand why a real doll would appeal to anyone who is not a necrophiliac... I prefer my women to actually move once in a while.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:Not sure... by ooshna · · Score: 1

      I doubt cuddling with a "real doll" while watching a non-pornographic movie would be very fun.

      Your wife has you trained well doesn't she.

    5. Re:Not sure... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I see you've never read any of my journals. I haven't had a wife for eight years now. I have half a dozen girlfriends. Well, they're not exactly MY girlfriends, they come over when they're horny but fighting with their boyfriends. Lots better than real dolls! What's even better, they're usually so pissed at their boyfriends that they spend the BF's money on ME!

      Oh, and I really do like cuddling. I like anything that ultimately leads to sex.

    6. Re:Not sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waitaminnit, how old are you? I always had you pegged for mid-to-high 50's, which certainly isn't the case here if you're capable of sustaining an erection, you manly man, you.

    7. Re:Not sure... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Yeah but this thing is named herpes.. its a new fourth strain too.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    8. Re:Not sure... by Cornelius+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should untie them a little beforehand.

      --
      Sigs are for losers
    9. Re:Not sure... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The demo was pretty light on. The robot just had to demonstrate dexterity. I would like to see a robot which can pick up a person passed out on the floor and put them in bed, or for a different use case, diagnose medical problems (diabetes, heart attack?) and call an ambulance, opening the door when they arrive.

    10. Re:Not sure... by somersault · · Score: 2

      I kept waiting for it to do a backflip. I was disappoint.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    11. Re:Not sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't had a wife for eight years now.

      You lucky bastard.

    12. Re:Not sure... by a_hanso · · Score: 1

      duuuuude! i know right? it totally looked like it was about to do one at one point

    13. Re:Not sure... by ooshna · · Score: 1

      LMAO being proud to just be the other guy. Hey its cool if chicks just use you to get back at their boyfriends. And no I haven't read your journals if I wanted to read about someones daily drivel I would have a twitter account or read blogs. Anyone who thinks their lives are that awesome that they have to write about them on the internet is fooling themselves. Because your writing about them.... on the internet... for strangers to read.

    14. Re:Not sure... by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      And the #1 worst job, for the 25th year in a row is.. Crack Whore

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    15. Re:Not sure... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I see you've never read any of my journals. I haven't had a wife for eight years now. I have half a dozen girlfriends. Well, they're not exactly MY girlfriends, they come over when they're horny but fighting with their boyfriends. Lots better than real dolls! What's even better, they're usually so pissed at their boyfriends that they spend the BF's money on ME!

      I like to think that I'm not really in favor of violence, but the greatest part of me hopes that posting that comment comes back to bite you in the form of a swift ass-kicking. I say this as someone who has been the other man more than once... but I've been proud of it zero times. You, on the other hand, are scum.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Not sure... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Anyone who thinks their lives are that awesome that they have to write about them on the internet

      It's not that my life is awesome that has people here commenting in them that they want them in hardcover and have my journals set as their home page. Some folks like the way they're written. But to each his own.

    17. Re:Not sure... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I'm 58, but I'm healthy. I do use viagra if I want to impress a woman, or if she's ugly.

    18. Re:Not sure... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      All a man has to do to keep me away from his woman is marry her. I respect "married". I don't respect "boyfriend." A single woman is fair game.

    19. Re:Not sure... by ooshna · · Score: 1

      Some people thought Jersey Shore deserved a second season too...

    20. Re:Not sure... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      All a man has to do to keep me away from his woman is marry her. I respect "married". I don't respect "boyfriend." A single woman is fair game.

      I'm not worried about you taking my woman though we're not married, but that's a bunch of bullshit. Marriage is a bullshit institution based on Greco-Roman contracts to establish rights of property. Only respecting those who are married means only respecting those who buy into the nonsense legal institution of marriage.

      All a man has to do to keep you away from his woman is fucking kill you, and someday you may be walked in on and end up perforated. You're a morally bankrupt idiot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Not sure... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I respect the covenenat of marriage, because that covenant is between God and everyone who worships him including me. Your covenant is between you and your SO, and I have no part of it. I've never agreed to stay away from your woman. Come after me if you wish; be advised that I don't think there's such a thing as a fair fight. When you get out of the hospital you'll go to jail, you violent hypocrite. If your best friend and your SO are having an affair, you have reason to be angry with your friend; as your friend, he's part of the agreement between you and your woman. But if she hooks up with some guy in a bar, that's her bad, not his. He has no reason whatever to not take her to bed; you have no legal or moral authority over him.

      If she loves you, she's going to be faithful. If she's not faithful it's not the guy's fault, it's hers, and probably yours as well for having a little dick you don't know how to use well.

      PS - Proud to be on your foes list, freak.

  4. Humanoid Robots are great and all by DontBlameCanada · · Score: 1

    But the words, "Exterminate! Exterminate!" evoke a much more visceral reaction from a robot that looks like a garbage can on wheels that one standing on 2 legs.

    As such, the Willow Garage PR2 and similar successors will be the constituents of my invasion force.

    Sincerely
    --Davros

    1. Re:Humanoid Robots are great and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The Daleks weren't robots, home-slice.

    2. Re:Humanoid Robots are great and all by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sadly, Davros's invasion force was stymied when it came across the first set of stairs, and failed miserably. Meanwhile, my invasion force using the HRP-4 went on to become a huge hit on Broadway!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:Humanoid Robots are great and all by Yetihehe · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dalek's don't navigate stairs. They level the building.

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    4. Re:Humanoid Robots are great and all by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1

      Dalek's don't navigate stairs. They level the building.

      Like Chuck Norris!

      Wait...is that part of that meme?

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    5. Re:Humanoid Robots are great and all by Psmylie · · Score: 1

      Cyberleader: Daleks, be warned. You have declared war on the Cybermen.
      Dalek: This is not war. This is pest control!
      Cyberleader: We have five million Cybermen. How many are you?
      Dalek: Four
      Cyberleader: You would destroy the Cybermen with four Daleks?
      Dalek: We would destroy the Cybermen with one Dalek!
      Cyberleader: Just one? No. You are thinking of Chuck Norris.
      Dalek: You are correct. I always get that mixed up.

      Yes, I am a colossal nerd.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    6. Re:Humanoid Robots are great and all by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dalek's don't navigate stairs. They level the building.

      Actually, Daleks were making their way up stairs as early as 1965. In "The Chase" they landed on the Mary Celeste at sea - on the main deck. They didn't show the Daleks climbing the stairs, but somehow one wound up on top of the Poop Deck a short while later...

      So even though the "Daleks don't climb stairs" thing has been a popular Doctor Who meme over the years, even used in the show, and specifically debunked, first in the Seventh Doctor era and then later with the Ninth... Most of the time it wasn't true. :)

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    7. Re:Humanoid Robots are great and all by daveime · · Score: 1

      Dalek's don't navigate stairs. They level the building.

      Attack Formation 7. Which is composed of three Daleks side by side shooting at the same time.

      I've been trying to work out what Attack Formations 1 through 6 might be.

    8. Re:Humanoid Robots are great and all by Professr3 · · Score: 1

      Home-skillet

    9. Re:Humanoid Robots are great and all by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      Sadly, Davros's invasion force was stymied when it came across the first set of stairs, and failed miserably. Meanwhile, my invasion force using the HRP-4 went on to become a huge hit on Broadway!

      No, no, you don't understand. Haven't you noticed this obsession lately from various government agencies in making everything "accessible" - with ramps everywhere? THEY ARE IN THE PAY OF THE DALEKS - we are all doomed.

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    10. Re:Humanoid Robots are great and all by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am a colossal nerd.

      Only in the USA. In the UK, Doctor Who is about as mainstream and popular as it gets. Come over here - you'll be happy. Also, you get to watch "Doctor Who at The Proms" at the Royal Albert Hall. :D

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    11. Re:Humanoid Robots are great and all by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      I've been trying to work out what Attack Formations 1 through 6 might be.

      Why eat hamburger when you can have steak?

  5. Chi? by 0racle · · Score: 1

    Chi!

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    1. Re:Chi? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Well.. that depends on where the put the reset button.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:Chi? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      "Stick it in her pooper" - Old Internet meme. Kinda ruined the scene for me :).

      Of course, you could simply cut the wires.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  6. Do Not Want by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    That would make a lousy sexbot. Come on, Japan, we expected much better than that of you! On the plus side, can it scrub toilets?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Do Not Want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, but it can make the work if 10 american cubicle drones in 10% of the time, because you are not happy losing your jobs to indians and mexicans, now failing for robots too. So sad, but tell me whats your son doing about these fembot problem?

      http://www.guzer.com/pictures/smart_kid.php

      yeah, thats right, he has a lolipop in his mouth so hes not losing weight, truly an american hero.

  7. Have they fixed the medicine problem? by spun · · Score: 2, Funny

    If these robots are going to be caring for old people, what will prevent them from stealing old people's medicine?

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Have they fixed the medicine problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grandma has no more need of medicine. She is protected at the bottom of the stairs.

    2. Re:Have they fixed the medicine problem? by darthdavid · · Score: 1
      We are the Space Robots

      Pak Chooie Unf

      Pak Chooie Unf

      Pak Chooie Unf Unf Unf Unf

  8. HRP-4 + Real Doll? by Anon-Admin · · Score: 1

    Combine the HRP-4 and a real doll and you could make billions!

    1. Re:HRP-4 + Real Doll? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Looks like they're one step ahead of you.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  9. Robot army! by AlfaMike · · Score: 1

    Anyone else felt a weird evil feeling when you read "building your robot army"?

    1. Re:Robot army! by Garridan · · Score: 1

      No, there is nothing weird about that evil feeling.

    2. Re:Robot army! by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

      More like buying your robot army, friggin trustfund Evil Overlords.

      Where are the two and three digit IDs saying back in their day they had to walk 5 miles in the snow uphill both ways to build a robot army/death ray/doomsday device.

    3. Re:Robot army! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Anyone else felt a weird evil feeling when you read "building your robot army"?

      That depends... was it purchased by somebody who died 10 years ago? If so, then you have absolutely no need to be suspscious and should surround yourself with them!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  10. Should of been built like the Terminator by Jetrel · · Score: 1

    Pretty awesome but would of been more ground breaking if the modeled it after the T-800 or T-101 or whatever. The whole time I was watching it I was wondering what would happen if someone just came up and pushed it really hard. Wonder if it would be able to compensate?

    --
    If it isn't broke, tinker with it till it is!
    1. Re:Should of been built like the Terminator by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's programmed to detect people trying to upset it's balance, and then kick them in the balls. Hard. Sure, it falls over, but you'll never try that shit again, I guarantee ya!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Should of been built like the Terminator by Spatial · · Score: 2, Funny

      Will you be able to compensate? You just knocked over 300,000 dollars of hardware.

    3. Re:Should of been built like the Terminator by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      The "T" models will take a while.

      This is just the "H" model.

      I suppose the "M" models will have M appeal tho.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    4. Re:Should of been built like the Terminator by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 1

      I'm no expert, but I think a majority of the $300000 is for the software.

    5. Re:Should of been built like the Terminator by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      It falls over. It even stays knocked over. It doesn't even struggle. And eventualy you decide to place it back on it's feet so it can get about it's daily chores again.

      And then it smothers you with a pillow while you're asleep.

  11. A little impressive. by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This would be real impressive if the video showed the robot actually doing real work.

    --

    Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
    1. Re:A little impressive. by JustSomeProgrammer · · Score: 1

      The real work of mass robot invasion has not been put through all the trials yet. So they want to hold off on the video demo.

    2. Re:A little impressive. by rotide · · Score: 1

      I was going to post something very similar.

      It's an interesting robot. It seems to have great balance and great range of motion, when it's just there by itself. What happens when it picks up something heavy? What happens when weight it is carrying shifts? Can it delicately handle easily damaged/broken items? Is it simply programmed, step by step for simple processes much like a line assembly stationary robot, or is it capable of recognizing and manipulating objects in three dimensions?

    3. Re:A little impressive. by timeOday · · Score: 1

      This isn't a shrinkwrapped product to do your dishes. The OEM should focus on physical specs like range of motion, torque, and number/type of sensors integrated. Then let researchers go from there.

    4. Re:A little impressive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZOMG, it looks like a robot from a movie! Is it a robot from a movie?!?!?! Liek, it can act like a human only better and smarter and faster and doesn't want to cuddle after you sex it?

      No, dumbass, it's a real robot from real life.

    5. Re:A little impressive. by interval1066 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, if you are a little familiar with Japanese culture you'd notice that the robot does some moves that would be recognizable to Japanese as moves and stances from Noh, Kabuki, Kendo, and probably a few other cultural things, which are rather precise. I'm sure the robot was programmed step by step, but never the less, the moves were rather smooth & precise.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    6. Re:A little impressive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be real impressive if the video showed the robot actually doing real work.

      You want a video of the robot browsing Slashdot?

    7. Re:A little impressive. by mean+pun · · Score: 1

      Sure, but that doesn't answer the original question: how well can it handle the unexpected? I also have to wonder why there are such long pauses between the moves. I suspect it is to do motion planning, but in any case these pauses are not there because the programmers wanted to have them. At least not for this long.

      Nevertheless, this is just demo software on an experimental platform, and this looks like a very impressive one. This robot is no longer laughably clumsy; it's just clumsy, and in the next one or two iterations it may even reach the stage where it could be used in production work. Since robotics is hard, that's very impressive.

  12. Especially if . . . by StefanJ · · Score: 1

    . . . you can program it to clean out its own orifices.

    I mean, yeeech, think about it.

    Or better yet, let's all don't think about it. It's almost lunchtime.

    1. Re:Especially if . . . by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      I can just see it now:

      The "HERPES-4_LOVE_DOLL" rushing for the hot water faucet then the Toilet to "Vomit" and "Pee" itself clean after an "encounter".

      If something like this sees light of day, crack whores could die of withdrawal.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    2. Re:Especially if . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read that as clean out *your* orifices, and my instant thought was of a robotic douche.

  13. I'll wait for the new one from US Robotics by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

    I heard its software is field upgradable without user intervention and works with other USR units to accomplish really big tasks.

    For some reason the brochure doesn't say what that really big task is...

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    1. Re:I'll wait for the new one from US Robotics by daveime · · Score: 1

      Carrying a lot of yen to the bank ?

  14. What we really want to know by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Can it dance? Is there a reward offered for the first team that successfully programs it to do "The Robot"? Will FOX be putting out a new reality show titled "So You Think Your Robot Can Dance"? Inquiring minds want to know!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:What we really want to know by adonoman · · Score: 1

      Of course it can dance.

    2. Re:What we really want to know by Foobar_ · · Score: 1

      There is a robot dance competition called Robo-One Gate. It was held last year at the International Robot Exposition trade show in Tokyo. It is associated with with the Robo-One Competition, which features robots wrestling and just had its 18th event.
      101,000 people visited the four-day marketing bonanza IREx 2009. The next one is being held in 2011.

      Links:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROBO-ONE
      http://singularityhub.com/2009/12/24/so-you-think-your-robot-can-dance-videos/
      http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=international+robot+exposition
      http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=robo-one

  15. Falling and Dexterity by ddxexex · · Score: 1

    The demo didn't address a few very important things about the robot (the only word I understood in that was 'watashi'). One, it showed it can move its hands but it didn't hold anything, so that's a bit suspect. The other thing that big since its bipedal rather than wheeled is that is has to worry more about falling over. It showed off its nice balance, but can it get up by itself? So it's kind of cool, but the only work I can see it doing is showing off is fashion related.

  16. $300,000 is nothing. Cheap, near free. by ourcraft · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Adding Afghanistan troops could cost $500000 per person - CNN.com http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/10/30/afghanistan.costs/index.html a few bullets, use your targets as food, (sorry 'fuel') and bob is your warlord. And people worry about the singularity... @ 300,000.00 it'll be just a factory away from running your own country. Imagine using a stream of these as a Denial Of Service attack on, ok nevermind, the future as the curse says, will be interesting, but not pleasant.

    1. Re:$300,000 is nothing. Cheap, near free. by daveime · · Score: 1

      I always thought the primary purpose of war was to kill as many of the other blokes as possible. That way, once you won, there was less of the buggers left to get annoyed at all the raping and pillaging you were doing.

  17. Costs as much as three Tesla Roadsters by Animats · · Score: 1

    Somebody has a manufacturing cost problem.

    This cost problem stalled robotics for years. Only in the last decade have research platform prices come down to even vaguely sane levels. Now, most universities with robotics programs have reasonable numbers of standard platforms running around, instead of just one or two hand-made units.

    This thing needs to come down to $50K or so. The Aldebaran Nao, which is a decent research humanoid robot, tops out at EUR 12,000. The best Japanese hobbyist machines are in the $1K to $2K range. The only sensor that's still way overpriced is LIDAR, and there's no fundamental reason for that.

    1. Re:Costs as much as three Tesla Roadsters by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      It's because lie detectors are very complex machines, hence their cost.

  18. or they could allow immigrants to work in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hmmm,... I guess Japan could try to invent intelligent robots to help their decrepit population, OR they could relax their racist immigration policies and allow immigrants in from Asia...
    I wonder which method has the best chance of working (actually I don't, it's fucking obvious to any non idiot)

    1. Re:or they could allow immigrants to work in Japan by Yetihehe · · Score: 0

      Yeah but immigrants become old people too. So letting them in will be only a temporary solution. If a robot breaks you can fix it (using another robot?) or replace.

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    2. Re:or they could allow immigrants to work in Japan by AnonymousClown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Immigrants pay taxes and pay into the pension system and consume (i.e. buy shit thereby creating more demand in the economy).

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    3. Re:or they could allow immigrants to work in Japan by myrdos2 · · Score: 1

      So... you also feel robots are the way to go?

    4. Re:or they could allow immigrants to work in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure racist is the best word to characterize their immigration policies. As far as I know they treat people for all over the world the same way, that is, to highly discourage immigration. That's not racist, but nationalistic. Racist would be what the US had (and probably will in the near future) that targeted specific immigrant groups (ie. no Chinese or Japanese in, but Irish or Italians are welcome).

    5. Re:or they could allow immigrants to work in Japan by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      Or they could start having children...

    6. Re:or they could allow immigrants to work in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Exactly! It's working out so well in Eurabia! Allah Akbar biatches!

    7. Re:or they could allow immigrants to work in Japan by daveime · · Score: 1

      and allow immigrants in from Asia

      Where, exactly, do you think Japan IS ?

      Anyway, the increasing trend these days is for said "immigrants" to pay as little as possible into the tax and pension scheme, rather send as much money as they can home to their own country (thus draining funds from the local economy), so they can build a house and live like a king once they retire.

    8. Re:or they could allow immigrants to work in Japan by khallow · · Score: 1

      Hmmm,... I guess Japan could try to invent intelligent robots to help their decrepit population, OR they could relax their racist immigration policies and allow immigrants in from Asia...

      My take is that it's an interesting experiment. If it doesn't work, then there's another arrow in the quiver for the multiculturalists. If it does work, then we have a better understanding of relatively extreme human societies than we did before.

    9. Re:or they could allow immigrants to work in Japan by wrook · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As an immigrant working in Japan I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one. The immigration policies are not racist in-so-far as they don't discriminate against any particular group of people. Instead immigration is discouraged, period. You may believe this is because Japanese people are racist in general, but my opinion is that you are wrong. I have experienced considerably less racism here than I have seen in my home country of Canada.

      IMHO, the immigration policy here is sensible. Why on earth do you want to take an already populous country and add more people to it? Japan is an island country. Maintaining a stable population is a brilliant idea. Why do should we increase our population until we can't support ourselves any more. Already Japan, which has laws indicating that it must be self sufficient for staple foods, is importing a huge amount of its food from other countries. For an island country, this is a huge security risk (just look at the number of people who starved to death after WWII).

      The ironic thing is that immigration to Japan is surprisingly easy if you have identified scarce skills. And if you have lived here for a period of time (for any reason!) you can pretty much stay here permanently if you have one of these scarce skills and can guarantee that you will make a reasonable salary. Lately they have been contemplating a language requirement for this, but I have to say that I'm in total agreement.

      As an immigrant to Japan I get pretty frustrated with people making blanket statements about Japanese racism. In this case I really wonder whether you know what the immigration policy is, or if it is a knee-jerk assumption that it is based on racism. Life here is very different from the west and it is easy for foreigners to get into trouble. But most of this is due to the lack of Japanese language ability. Of the people I know here who are fluent in Japanese I can't think of any who have major difficulties living here. Conversely there are few westerners without Japanese fluency that have an easy time of it. Without the language it is virtually impossible to integrate with the society. In Japan, if you can't integrate you will be in for a rough ride.

    10. Re:or they could allow immigrants to work in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. get a government grant to train illegal aliens in robotics.

      2. wrap applicants in aluminum foil.

      3. export to Japan

      4. uh... PROFIT !

    11. Re:or they could allow immigrants to work in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking at wikipedia's list of countries sorted by population density, I find that Japan has 127m people in 147k sq miles (about the area of Montana), while US is 3.8m sq miles with 310m people. Japan has about 10x higher population density than the US, and probably 2-3x more than Europe. Homes there are tiny, as I understand it - 300 to 600 square feet for a _family_.

      Immigration and pro-natal policies make no sense in such a crowded country. Our economy seems to depend on constantly increasing demand and population, but we live on a finite planet. That's a problem - with the design of the economy, not with people making rational decisions to live within their means by having only as many children as they can afford, or by limiting immigration to their already crowded nations. As the world develops, people everywhere will begin making similarly sane choices. The population economic pyramid scheme is going to bust by mid to late 21st century.

      I applaud the Japanese for making creative efforts to escape the demographic trap. We're going to need their robots to feed us, bathe us, and wipe our asses when we're all 90 years old.

    12. Re:or they could allow immigrants to work in Japan by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Hmmm,... I guess Japan could try to invent intelligent robots to help their decrepit population, OR they could relax their racist immigration policies and allow immigrants in from Asia...
      I wonder which method has the best chance of working (actually I don't, it's fucking obvious to any non idiot)

      You're right, any asshole with two neurons to rub together should understand that Japan is full. Japan has conditions that make the Japanese leave! There's huge enclaves of Japanese in other nations, because there's not enough room for everyone on their island and anyone who wasn't winning was voted off already. Immigration is NOT the answer; Japan is well over its carrying capacity already. Every nation which cannot feed its people with its own food production should be trying to REDUCE population, not increase it, and Japan is one of the nations of the world least-equipped to feed its people without external supplies. Every part of the country that can produce food pretty much is, unless someone lives there.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:or they could allow immigrants to work in Japan by wrook · · Score: 1

      Housing really depends on where you live. 400 square feet would really be the minimum for a family with kids (although single child families are common) from my experience. But I live in the countryside so I don't know what Tokyo is like, for instance. Lots of couples live in apartments that are 300 square feet. Some of my single friends live in apartments that are even smaller.

      In Canada I lived in a 2000 square foot house. My apartment in Japan is a fairly spacious 24 tatami (about 400 square feet). Strangely, I don't find it cramped, but the space is utilized a lot better than my old house.

      But yes, there's no need to add more people. However, a lot of people still believe that the falling birth rate is a major problem here. I still can't quite fathom the logic (other than the economic one that rising populations are required for economic growth).

  19. I don't always HRP-4.... by Mayhem178 · · Score: 2, Funny

    but when I do, I DRP-4.

    --

    "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

  20. $500,000 is NOTHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U.S. $ 1 million per troop.

    Yours In Ashgabat,
    K. Trout

  21. Can it recover from unexpected instability? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    What if it walks on a surface that is moving chaotically? What if something or someone collides with it or pushes it? Can it react instantly to such enexpected situations to keep its balance as well as a human can?

  22. Evil Robot Army delayed by strong Yen by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

    Great we finally have robot soldiers ready to export and the strongest Yen to Dollar exchange rate in 15 years...

    Just 2 years ago you'd have had nearly 50% more buying power.

  23. Why is the American robot so expensive? by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    While certainly not cheap, why is the Japanese robot so much cheaper than what the American company is offering, especially when it seems to be more sophisticated?

    I'd like to know what Japanese companies have figured out that Americans are incapable of. Whenever a Japanese company begins selling some fairly high technology to the public it ends up being substantially cheaper than what an American counterpart would have asked. Is it that much more expensive to run a business and manufacture something in the US? Are Americans simply more likely to overcharge? Whatever it is, it seems to be a recurring pattern. If it's a product from an American company, and it isn't cheap crap made in China, then you're going to pay through the nose for it.

    1. Re:Why is the American robot so expensive? by Zerth · · Score: 1

      The lack of land in Japan leads to minimizing inventory/work-in-progress and efficiency of machinery. This sometimes leads to lower cost of goods as a side effect.

  24. Excellent robot platform by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    An excellent robot platform would be upgradeable to better parts over time, so new arms/hands/legs/motion controls/battery units/cameras and other sensors could be installed and so more 'brains' could connect to it via a wireless network, then it would be up to the programs to provide this machine with more and more capabilities. Sure, it doesn't know your apartment and can't wash dishes right now, but give it a server with a good map of your place and add more software to 'teach' it to wash dishes, and there you have it.

  25. Robot soldiers are a BAD idea by mark-t · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that using robots instead of human beings to fight our wars just sets us up for a situation where 100% of the casualties of war will be civilians.

    1. Re:Robot soldiers are a BAD idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So, you prefer to reduce that percentage by diluting the civilian deaths with additional soldier deaths? o.0

    2. Re:Robot soldiers are a BAD idea by clintonmonk · · Score: 0

      and dead people.

    3. Re:Robot soldiers are a BAD idea by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe that will give civilian populations less incentive to fight stupid and pointless wars. If they know the only lives at risk are their own, then they don't have the convenience of armed and trained soldiers to hide behind.

    4. Re:Robot soldiers are a BAD idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this related to the plan the US has to have Japanese robots build a base on the moon?
      I honestly can't see any reason to use them on Earth.

    5. Re:Robot soldiers are a BAD idea by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Except that in practice, the average civilian rarely has any real say in whether or not a war should be fought.

    6. Re:Robot soldiers are a BAD idea by mark-t · · Score: 1

      As those are generally the people who are actually fighting, as opposed to civilians... yes. Because then seeking peaceful solutions becomes a much more appealing option to the people who would actually choose to go to war in the first place because they have a real chance of dying themselves.

    7. Re:Robot soldiers are a BAD idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japan is making robots for civilian use. Guess which country leads in military use and R&D of robots right now?

  26. Anime predicting the future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bubble Gum Crisis, Bubble Gum Crash. Boomers.

    'nuff said.

  27. Robot Armies by Dvinn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These already look about as capable as the droids in the Star Wars movie universe. Now they just need to be programmed to say 'roger roger.'

  28. Sounds great, but.... by exx1976 · · Score: 0

    can it run Crysis?

  29. Cobra! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd definitely pay 300k for a robot whose blue version looks like a scaled down Cobra Commander.

    Do you think he sings the GI-Joe theme song?

  30. Robo-slave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Japan, HRP-4 is another step forward in creating useful mechanical workers to deal with a forthcoming shortage in the labor force and care for an aging population. HRP-4's creators expect to start selling the robot to universities and other research institutions as early as January 2011 for a price tag of $300,000, which is not that bad for a humanoid."

    The age of robot slavery starts. Theirs not ours.

  31. Sexbot demo in video? by Saishuuheiki · · Score: 1

    I for one noticed in the demo video that there was another robot with a female head in the background on the right.
    While industrial uses are probably limited, I wonder how many would pay out the $200,000 price tag for that one.

    To the future of the Japanese sex industry

  32. HRP-4? by Linux_ho · · Score: 1

    I'm gonna hold out until they release its canine robotic companion, the DRP-4.

    --
    include $sig;
    1;
  33. Thou Misseth Ye Olde Pointe By Ye Longe Fur. by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Funny

    On the whole, I think I'd rather hire an au pair girl.

    If the Robot does the dishes and the floors and etc., then neither you nor your lady have to do it, and thusly, get to spend more time exploring the various corners of your sexual identities.

    This does, of course, require a ladyfriend, and this is, of course, slashdot, so perhaps I'm being overly optimistic.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  34. Robots coming on faster than expected. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been thinking robots would be a real problem starting in about 2020 based on current vision and manual dexterity systems progress.
    Discussing this elsewhere (and told I was too pessimistic), I came across the following information.

    http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2010/tc2010061_798891.htm
    Soon, That Nearby Worker Might Be a Robot

    Online retailer Diapers.com employs more than 350 of the robots in three warehouses, and is adding "hundreds per month," says Executive Vice-President Scott Hilton. Retailer Crate & Barrel has purchased Kiva robots to be installed in its Tracy (Calif.) distribution center in July. One reason Crate & Barrel and Diapers.com decided to use Kiva robots is that the robots can work in the dark, reducing carbon emissions and saving money on air-conditioning and lighting. ...

    at El Camino Hospital in Silicon Valley, 19 robots fulfill a range of tasks, from delivering medication and food to taking out trash. ...

    Hiring as many humans ... would have cost the hospital more than $1 million a year, says Ken King, vice-pr.... Leasing the robots from Aethon costs $350,000 a year, which helps the hospital contain costs and offer patients affordable health care, he says.

    The Tug robots pull their weight, say hospital officials. Tugette, for example, rolls through El Camino Hospital's corridors making deliveries around the clock, opening doors, summoning elevators, and speaking politely with workers and patients.

    --

    So let's see.

            * Two THIRDs cheaper than humans
            * Works 24 hours a day
            * Works in the dark
            * Doesn't require air conditioning
            * Some companies are employing "hundreds of them" with more on the way.
            * Replaces humans who go into the warehouse and get things and who stock shelves.
            * If you have any kind of SLA, it also basically never gets sick.

    And that's NOW. Right now. Already happening- not 10 years from now.

    It's going to be very difficult to adjust to this change in less than a generation- if it is even possible to adjust to it at all.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:Robots coming on faster than expected. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's going to be very difficult to adjust to this change in less than a generation- if it is even possible to adjust to it at all.

      It'll be pretty easy if we have a mass dieoff. If I were one of the evil bastards who's been running this planet since time was time, I'd be thinking about ways to kill off the excess population before it took to rioting.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  35. Boy oh boy... by darien.train · · Score: 1

    Japanese culture will go down in the history books as one of the most interesting and self-destructive cultures of all time. They're essentially destroying themselves (both literally with suicide and figuratively by not breeding enough to replace their population numbers) and seem to be in some kind of race to replace themselves with robots rather than suffer the indignity of opening their culture to outsiders. My wish is that the burakumin take to the streets and impose a cultural uprising that will set Japan back on a course toward healthy minds, equality, and some damn common-sense. If they wanted to throw animal blood on the attendees of Tokyo U that would be good too.

    I know a lot of people think Japanese culture is really cool as I once did. You won't think it's so cool if you dig past the bright lights and anime to see the seriously f'd up stuff that goes on there. I would go as far as to say that they're culture is more depraved and sad than ours (US Urban North East-Cost).

    --
    I don't know how many years on this Earth I got left. I'm going to get real weird with it. - Frank Reynolds
    1. Re:Boy oh boy... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      unhh...Japan is severely overpopulated. This is ONE of the reasons their immigration policies are so restrictive. (Admittedly not the only one.)

      It's true that the population is aging, but you don't solve a population problem by increasing the size of the base of the pyramid. Robots MAY be an answer. (Even if they aren't good enough to care for elders, they can do other jobs, which free those people to take other jobs, freeing some people to assist elders. Whether this will work depends on how easily people can transition from job class to job class, which is largely dependent on social policies. (It's usually been handled pretty damn poorly everywhere on the planet...but that just means it's something that needs improvement, it doesn't mean it isn't the right answer.)

      P.S.: When I say difficult, I'm including economic and retraining costs as difficulties. And support for oneself and ones dependents while in the process of transition. Also possible relocation expenses...including reestablishing a network of friends. EVERYTHING, and there's lots. All of which are generally handled in an extremely poor manner, because the displaced person is in a powerless position. This NEEDS to be improved, or the robots are just going to be trashed by angry mobs. (Robot soldiers aren't the correct answer to this problem, but it appears to be the only solution that's being worked on.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:Boy oh boy... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      What is better about having your genetic code bred out of existence, and your culture completely replaced by immigrants over having your genetic code lost through lack of breeding and your culture lost due to nobody from your culture being left? They have both happened to many cultures over the centuries, and they are both likely to continue to happen.

    3. Re:Boy oh boy... by darien.train · · Score: 1

      What is better about having your genetic code bred out of existence, and your culture completely replaced by immigrants over having your genetic code lost through lack of breeding and your culture lost due to nobody from your culture being left?

      The idea that a culture can be bred out of existence is antithetical to how DNA works. DNA merges, it doesn't attack and destroy other DNA.

      They have both happened to many cultures over the centuries, and they are both likely to continue to happen.

      It is rare for a populous to die out from a culturally imposed social dysfunction which is what makes Japan so interesting. They could breed themselves to healthy numbers if they really wanted to.

      --
      I don't know how many years on this Earth I got left. I'm going to get real weird with it. - Frank Reynolds
    4. Re:Boy oh boy... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The idea that a culture can be bred out of existence is antithetical to how DNA works. DNA merges, it doesn't attack and destroy other DNA.

      No, it doesn't "merge". It recombines. It is like two jigsaw puzzles that were cut with the same cutter, but with different pictures. Take the two puzzles, put them in a box, and shake them up. Put the puzzle together until you have a whole puzzle. Now, take 1 copy of the first puzzle, and 1000 copies of the second puzzle. When you shake them up in a box and put them together, the first picture for all intents and purposes will have ceased to exist. Take in the random 'lost pieces', and over thousands of iterations, the first puzzle will literally be gone. Of course this is if one puzzle has some inherent advantage over the other.

      It is rare for a populous to die out from a culturally imposed social dysfunction which is what makes Japan so interesting. They could breed themselves to healthy numbers if they really wanted to.

      No, they are just likely to last longer because they have the technology to deal with the declining numbers, outside observers that are interested enough to notice, and a peaceful enough world to keep it from being overthrown by the outside observers that are interested enough to notice.

    5. Re:Boy oh boy... by darien.train · · Score: 1

      No, they are just likely to last longer because they have the technology to deal with the declining numbers, outside observers that are interested enough to notice, and a peaceful enough world to keep it from being overthrown by the outside observers that are interested enough to notice.

      I think you're going to have to explain that a bit better. What technology is going to stop the declining numbers? Why not just have sex like the rest of us?

      No, it doesn't "merge". It recombines.

      Semantic difference. I know how DNA recombines. My point is that genetic purity is a silly notion. The more diverse the genes the better the individual traits. If the Japanese were less worried about preserving some romantic notion of blood purity and more serious about being members of a larger world community their numbers wouldn't be declining.

      --
      I don't know how many years on this Earth I got left. I'm going to get real weird with it. - Frank Reynolds
    6. Re:Boy oh boy... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I think you're going to have to explain that a bit better. What technology is going to stop the declining numbers? Why not just have sex like the rest of us?

      You are looking at the statement backwards. I wasn't saying that their numbers are not declining. I'm saying that other groups have gone through the same thing. The Japanese are not the first group of humans in history to have their population reduced due to cultural factors.

      My point is that genetic purity is a silly notion. The more diverse the genes the better the individual traits. If the Japanese were less worried about preserving some romantic notion of blood purity and more serious about being members of a larger world community their numbers wouldn't be declining.

      Belief that total diversity is inherently better than total purity is a silly notion. If everyone on the planet were interbreeding, as is the trend, then you end up losing your genetic diversity, as genetic drift gets reigned in pretty quickly. The way you get genetic diversity is by having groups separated long enough either by geography or socially, that genetic drift can happen.

  36. Posting 101 by daveime · · Score: 1

    The important lesson being if you are going to place a Slashvertisement, make sure your server has the bandwidth to handle all the traffic.

    I guess once they've sold one of those $300,000 dollar babies, they'll be able to upgrade their hosting plan.

  37. Re:Do tell us... by L3370 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are you implying that a western nation. such as the U.S. perhaps, is better off without people like me that make it a "cultural zoo?" DIAF please.

    Japan has a history of disliking Koreans and the Chinese. They let everyone know in WW2. Although VERY much has changed in terms of their sentiments and superiority complex since then, I would NOT be surprised if those feelings are still lingering around in the form of odd immigration policies.

    It's funny how many of my fellow right-leaning americans (yes I can tell you are one by your post) discount everything they disagree with as Left Wing. As if your opinion is a wall, and anything outside of your wall is a land populated by undesirables and kooks.

  38. Re:Do tell us... by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

    Actually Japanese are usually considered fairly racist... Against anyone not Japanese. They have sizable Korean and Chinese populations in their country that they actively discriminate against for instance (both are 'second class citizens'). Though even among themselves they still discriminate against a certain class of their own people, though they do have a law against discovering who is of that class (though it's badly worded and stops nothing).

    It's also really really hard to get citizenship. I know of a few people who have married Japanese women and moved to Japan... Then spent the next 15 years gaining citizenship... They are considered one of the hardest countries to immigrate to in the world.

    Combine that with long lifespans and a dwindling population growth (family size is often 1 or 2 at most), then toss in a whole generation with issues like NEATS and generally high unemployment as companies don't hire as many new workers (since the old ones often never retire)... And you may start to see why they are having issues...

    --
    we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  39. And I for one welcome by exx1976 · · Score: 0

    our new HRP-4 overlords.

  40. Counterhumanoid Robots by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I don't need a humanoid robot. I've already got the humanoid that needs augmentation: myself. If I need another humanoid, I've got a wife. I need nonhumanoids for all the things my wife won't/can't do. What I really need is a robot chair that carries me around Jazzfest, defaulting to my preferred scheduled stages and food booths, then bars around New Orleans, while arranging the best meeting places with my friends. I need a chair that will take me up and down stairs, carrying groceries and stuff. Something in my garage that will load and unload my car (which should be a lot more robotic, like finding its own parking and doing basic errands without me), delivering the stuff to wherever in my house it goes. Take out the trash, to the curb, after separating the recycling. Make my bed, carry laundry from floor to hamper to washer to dryer, folding it back into the closets and drawers. Unload the dishwasher into the cabinets. Walk the dog.

    Some of those tasks might best be done by a humanoid, since humans have done them adequately for so long. Really they mostly need hands and arms, but maybe not, and feet, but only because we've got steps, and probably something more like tank tracks which can deform on the roller axles to "walk" or something like it.

    Having any or all of those tasks built into a single humanoid, or a team, is creepy. It's more a latent desire to enslave other humans than a desire to offload tasks to whatever just gets them done. Making them humanoid seems like a lot of extra work for just a fetish. So there's probably a market for AI "Real Doll" robots, but the stuff I don't want any part of doing should probably be a lot more abstract in form factor.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Counterhumanoid Robots by khallow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some of those tasks might best be done by a humanoid, since humans have done them adequately for so long. Really they mostly need hands and arms, but maybe not, and feet, but only because we've got steps, and probably something more like tank tracks which can deform on the roller axles to "walk" or something like it.

      Having any or all of those tasks built into a single humanoid, or a team, is creepy. It's more a latent desire to enslave other humans than a desire to offload tasks to whatever just gets them done. Making them humanoid seems like a lot of extra work for just a fetish. So there's probably a market for AI "Real Doll" robots, but the stuff I don't want any part of doing should probably be a lot more abstract in form factor.

      So you want to expensive restructure your house to accommodate a tracked robot just because you don't want to seem to have a humanoid fetish? My take is that a human home is designed around a humanoid form. Hence, it doesn't take a fetish to desire a humanoid robot that can operate in your home without requiring substantial changes to the home.

    2. Re:Counterhumanoid Robots by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      No, I don't want a track. I want a robot that can follow me around anywhere. And one that's built into, or sits on, my washing machine, my dishwasher, my closet. Getting things between stationary robots that enhance features of stationary furniture can be other, mobile robots, that serve multiple functions each requiring transport or mobility.

      My home already accommodates many things not at all humanoid, indeed often better than it accommodates my own body (I bump things that have necessary shapes for function, but my human form is not completely compatible with).

      It's not because I don't want to seem to have a humanoid fetish, it's because I don't actually have a humanoid fetish, and I don't want to pay/wait extra for a humanoid version. I want things that fit my home and my body, and a humanoid shape is more like the plug for the socket I want than it is a model for the socket.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Counterhumanoid Robots by mark-t · · Score: 1

      While you present an interesting perspective, it could be argued that by utilizing a human shape for a robot, the robot is simply more readily adaptable to many different tasks. Using special purpose devices may well be more efficient in the sense of getting any one particular job done, but the increased versatility that comes from using a single form that can adapt to a variety of different tasks could also easily be worth the tradeoff in many cases. Plus, of course, you don't have to have some 3 or 4 dozen different appliances, one for each custom task that that you could easily have one single robot doing. Such a robot could even use the same tools that may have been originally designed for humans to use, without having to redesign the tool, taking advantage of an already-existing infrastructure.

    4. Re:Counterhumanoid Robots by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Well, that perspective might already have been true of all our appliances. Why don't we have one single appliance that does it all? Indeed, why do we have separate space heaters, water heaters, and cookers? Why do we have shop vacs and carpet vacs? Landline handsets and mobile handsets (indeed that one shows the problems of "one size fits all" that we're trying, badly, and mainly only because it's enforced by carriers).

      The Unix perspective that's informed so much in technology since the 1970s is the value of a "device" that does one thing, completely and well, but leaves different uses to other things. Which is why I have both a toaster and a broiler, even though they're redundant. And why I'll probably prefer to have a dishwasher unloader robot that's separate from my separate clothes washer/dryer changer, folder and stower robots. Indeed, I've got separate washer and dryer, though they're 80%+ the same, and kinda big, even though there are combo units which cost less but aren't as good.

      These robots I described all tend to have tasks that humans aren't well adapted to do. They're maintenance tasks for things humans are adapted to use, but the maintenance of the object requires fairly arduous and tedious work for the human form. The robot forms would probably not resemble humans much, as they already don't in industry where there are already some applications of machines to the tasks.

      Humans are multipurpose, because we're individuals. Robots need have no such limitation. Which is why cars don't look at all like people - they look like the shape humans fit into.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Counterhumanoid Robots by mark-t · · Score: 1
      I think that ultimately the primary idea behind a human shaped robot is not to do work that can't be done by people, but to *DO* work that can be performed by people so that other people don't HAVE to do that job. Robots may not require the "limitation" of being shaped like people, but we can't deny the adaptability that several hundred million years of evolution has given this form, and we would be nothing less than arrogant to think we might be able to design something even more versatile without at least mimicking that form first.

      Baby steps.

    6. Re:Counterhumanoid Robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More correctly, actually, you have a fetish for something *NON* humanoid, as fetishes are preferences that fall outside of the notion of what is considered normal, as preferring the human form is a normal thing for most humans.

    7. Re:Counterhumanoid Robots by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the arrogance lies in thinking we'll start out replacing human tasks with a robot that is as versatile as a human. I just ran down all the automation we've already got, none of which is human in form, but all of which is the point from which incremental automation is on the verge of being robotic. The tasks I'm talking about doing with robots haven't been done for the several hundred million years of human evolution, and indeed mostly haven't been done, certainly not well, since humans stopped evolving as much as we instead change the environment to suit our genetics.

      So the baby steps are giving the clothes dryer arms to fold shirts, which aren't going to look much like human arms to work right, not replicating a human body to do it as clumsily as humans do. Even though humans can also do other things adequately to survive to reproduce, a separate body in very different form to do those things is beyond the realm of human evolution - except that we've evolved to make robots which don't look like us.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:Counterhumanoid Robots by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      No, a fetish is actually any feature that is not directly required by the necessities of the result but rather is arbitrarily required to achieve it anyway. This is true in its original meaning in sexuality and spiritual practice, and in technology. The human form, as I have pointed out, is not necessary to complete these tasks, but is an arbitrary requirement.

      What is "normal" has nothing to do with the definition of fetish, except in slang about sex that is not correct in general usage.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    9. Re:Counterhumanoid Robots by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I think it's less of an issue thinking that we'll start out there and more along the idea that we hope to eventually attain that goal. Personally, I think we're getting close, and we could see it happening probably in our lifetime. Ultimately, we may even surpass our own adaptability with some design for robots we have not yet imagined that is *MORE* versatile than our own form.

      Anyways... so you could have a robot with many arms to fold your clothes as they finish drying. How's it going to put them away in your dresser for you? To accomplish this, you need to add mobility. This means that compromises need to be made to the robots arms so that the appliance is relatively easy to move around. Now how do you accomplish the locomotion? Wheels? No good for any home with stairs... thus you need to either add legs, or else install elevators in every multifloor home. Most people wouldn't be too amenable to the latter. And while you could make the robot a 6-legged insectoid and it will be able to balance much better, an appliance with 6 legs is going to invariable be a lot larger and probably a lot less ergonomic than one with just 2. While the bipedal robot admittedly requires much more engineering to make it capable of maintaining its balance at all times, it is far from an unattainable goal (as the HRP-4 and several other bipedal robots have illustrated).

      Anyways, it's all fine and good to criticize that from the perspective that you feel that each individual task may not be getting done as well as many specialized machines could do it, but a single versatile machine will generally take up far less space than many different appliances, will not create as much clutter in a person's household, and could likely even be more economical in the long run.

      I can totally see, however, that while many housekeeping robots in the future will likely be bipedal, it's not inconceivable that they could have more than 2 arms, to the extent that such a unit does not become an eyesore, and they could well have modular attachments that could enable them to specialize at specific tasks, in a not altogether dissimilar way to the way a lot of modern food processors are right now, where you use different attachments on the same basic machine depending on the actual purpose for which you are using it. A properly engineered robot would be capable of attaching and detaching such components autonomously, as needed.

      And anyways, why should your wife have to do all those things that you mentioned earlier where in the future a single human-shaped robot could accomplish it *AND* free up your wife's time to pursue her own interests rather than deal with all those chores? I mean, you seem to want your wife to free up *YOUR* time, why shouldn't she want the same?

    10. Re:Counterhumanoid Robots by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      As I said, there's no real point to having a single machine do all these tasks. The arms should be part of the washing machine, though they probably won't be like human arms but rather the arms of a "mangle" (commercial clothes folding machine). Then a separate robot that moves things around the house should move the clothes to the closet. That mobile robot sould probably have tank tracks with articulations that can climb stairs, or a conveyor track on the stairs to a separate robot per storey, or a snake shape, or any of the many mobile robot designs already working that are nothing like humanoid. The closet should have arms to accept and hang the clothes, or a rolling stack of shelves to take and dispense the clothes.

      The point is that the robots shapes will be the shapes of the objects they're managing, and the different function will be included in separate robots instead of one single body. The reasons the human body is the shape it is have a lot to do with the fact that humans must have a single body, in a single shape, evolved to very different conditions than the shape of a house and the objects in it, and their other lifecycle apart from the time humans are using them.

      As for my wife, what I said was that my needs for another humanoid are satisfied by my wife. All of the tasks I'm talking about robots doing are now done by she and I equally, and neither of us need to do them, while none of them need a humanoid. As for what I need a humanoid for that my wife does, that's none of your business :).

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    11. Re:Counterhumanoid Robots by mark-t · · Score: 1
      The point is practicality. A single machine will generally be less expensive than many other machines, will take up less space, and is much less likely to clash with any existing interior design than having numerous machines all over the place without having to re-engineer the home from scratch to accomodate such automation, as some of the things you've mentioned would require, unless you like living in a place that looks like a factory (most do not). It's not at all impractical to want to exploit an existing infrastructure, rather than want to design a new one from scratch. And given people can be more than just slightly attached to their homes, I think that's a HUGE practical point right there. Most of the alternative mobility mechanisms you mentioned for navigating things like stairs are nowhere even close to as versatile as simple legs, and some of them would not be practical on any sort of general purpose programmable mobile platform.

      Yes, it requires more work to make it a reality, but once we're there (and as I said, I think we almost are), what's the problem?

    12. Re:Counterhumanoid Robots by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Nothing you said is actually true of any of the other machines we make. I have cited many examples. Having a central heater, a separate fireplace, a toaster, an oven and a stove and a hair dryer don't make the home look like a factory. I have also said multiple times that the mobile robots can use either an articulated track, snake or other locomotion that doesn't require any new infrastructure, but work better than legs, and perhaps a simple track on the side of stairs that many homes already have in greater complexity for moving old people - which is nearly a robot itself.

      I think you're just not thinking about how we already are well down the path to the robotic forms I am describing because you're thinking of only the science fiction that was written before we had much home automation at all yet. We already have autonomous robot vacuums, mops, even dishwashers that are pretty complex. Our cars are pretty sophisticated robots, especially the few that already parallel park themselves. Our home HVAC systems are becoming pretty smart robots totally unrecognizable as "humanoid", and the smart grid intelligence and automation is just coming over the horizon.

      We will have many more robots without humanoid form within the next 10 years, before we have even a single humanoid home robot that is anything but a gimmick purely for its humanoid shape, not because that shape is nearly as practical as the nonhumanoid shapes we'll already have.

      In any case, I'm repeating my arguments. Nice talking to you.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    13. Re:Counterhumanoid Robots by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Installing a track into a home involves installing a structure that can easily be seen as an eyesore by people who do not require such a device to navigate the stairs themselves. Heck, it might be seen as ugly even BY people who require it. Ultimately, it is not something most people would want to do if they had a choice. If the human inhabitants of a home do not require the track to get around, why should it be required for a robot? Particularly since bipedal locomotion for robots is not the science fiction you seem to think that it is. A snake-like locomotive mechanism would admittedly be very good for certain types of automated devices, perhaps such as robotic vacuum cleaners or other units that do not need much clearance from the floor, but would be unlikely to be practical for a device that requires more height, or might need arms for other purposes.

      But I haven't once suggested that we aren't well on the way to seeing the robotic forms you've suggested, I'm only saying that such forms are, ultimately, not as practical in non-industrial environments as a human shaped one for something that is, ultimately, intended to *DO* the sorts of things that humans do so that humans will not be required to do them (because they are either dangerous, menial, or boring) and so that humans can have more time for pursuits they actually *DO* find more interesting. Laundry machines, washing machines, and automated vacuums are all great labour saving devices, but humans still have to collect what needs cleaning, load them up, empty them out, and put things away where they go properly, as well as empty the vacuum cleaner canister regularly themselves (not to mention the fact that I've never seen ANY robot vacuum that cleans a carpet as well as a regular vacuum does). Most of these are menial tasks that individually do not take up much time, but they add up, and it still does take up time during which people could be doing other, more productive or more enjoyable activities. Another shortcoming of existing automated vacuums is that they are not able to navigate stairs, so their usage is further limited in multilevel homes or loft apartments without making changes to the home. For all the shortcomings to the currently existing robotic forms we utilize, however, virtually all of them can be addressed by the introduction of a robot that is simply physically able to do all of the same physical tasks as a human, who would otherwise have to fill in those gaps himself. It only stands to reason that the most obvious shape to do all those tasks would be human-shaped.

  41. Not good enough by fuego451 · · Score: 1

    I'll hold out for a cyborg babe.

  42. Future of military not workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the cost of one missile you could load several of these down with enough solid explosive and hand over a rifle or two an would be much more effective and directed. The only problem would be insertion. On the other side, why cant they make one taller than them?

  43. Re:Do tell us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with a "cultural zoo"? You do realize there's no pure race or culture in the entire history of the world, right? You're just being racist/nationalist fighting against the tide of reality.

  44. Japan's fictional labor shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read lots about the labor shortage in Japan. I lived there 9 years ago, and I visited again this past Spring.

    What labor shortage? The lifetime jobs with benefits are a thing of the past. Many young people I met (35 or younger) were working two part time jobs and still living with their parents. It feels like Japanese companies don't want to pay the good wages of the prior generation, so they invent this labor shortage story.

  45. A real robot doing the robot dance! by CAFED00D · · Score: 1

    Where's David Elsewhere when you need him? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAyTK6jF5o8

  46. Ok, stupid question.... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    OK, I mean on a cultural level. On a personal level, I would be much happier if huge numbers of women from different cultures tried to wipe out my genetic code by having lots of sex with me.

  47. TPC reports coming on faster than expected. by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    "I call her 'Tugette,' " says Muniz, who works in hospital admissions. The voice is about the only feminine part of this robot, which was developed by Aethon as part of a product line called Tug, which automatically transports food, medicine, and lab samples around hospitals.

    I should point out a previous slashdot story on pneumatic tubes and one of their uses in hospitals.

    Using the Anybots device known as QB, for example, it's possible for a remote operator to roll up to a colleague and ask an impromptu question, replicating in some measure the unplanned conversations that occur in offices.

    Ummm, about those TPC reports.

    The lights in the tunnel.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:TPC reports coming on faster than expected. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pneumatic tubes are great up to a point. Issues:

      * Not everything fits in a tube. A wheeled robot with trays can bring almost any article a nurse or doctor would be likely to need.

      * Retro-fitting a pneumatic system is an expensive one-time capital outlay that's terribly invasive. You cannot "try" tubes. Once you've spent the money you are committed. But if the robots don't deliver the benefit you wanted, just cancel the lease.

      And you're probably thinking of TPS reports not TPC reports.

  48. Yes, but by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

    will they be able to vote?

  49. YOU are the one who is being racist. by pario · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmmm,... I guess Japan could try to invent intelligent robots to help their decrepit population, OR they could relax their racist immigration policies and allow immigrants in from Asia... I wonder which method has the best chance of working (actually I don't, it's fucking obvious to any non idiot)

    Well, I don't think our immigration policies are particularly racist. We generally don't want immigrants regardless of their race or country of origin, period. Our strict immigration policies are necessary, IMO, to maintain our cultural identity and unique cultural values, and most of us like it that way.

    If your country accepts immigrants from all over the world and take unfair advantage of their cheap labor under the hypocritical names of justice and freedom while they suffer tremendously from racism, that's fine with us. (I lived in the United States for 12 years and I know for a fact that racism against immigrants is rampant here.) But please, for Christ's sake, respect Japan's soverinty as an independent nation. You are being racist by calling us racist *just because* our values are different from yours.