Slashdot Mirror


Criminal Charges Against Speed Trap Tweeter

martinlp writes "A Twitter account named Pigspotter is making big news in South Africa. The traffic authorities in Johannesburg are taking legal action against Pigspotter, an individual who is tweeting up-to-the-minute information about speed traps in and around the city. He has recently stopped, stating that his Blackberry is going in for repairs, but it may be out of fear of getting prosecuted. The police claim he must be getting inside information and suspect that disgruntled traffic officers may be involved. There is also speculation that it is more than one individual that is tweeting."

45 of 253 comments (clear)

  1. But how precise is it? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Police here in Victoria, Australia actively encourage the publication of speed camera locations, which are not particularly precise. So radio stations can report that there is a speed camera on $HIGHWAY without saying exactly where it is and drivers slow down all along that route.

    Now if you tell the public exactly where the speed camera is (1km past $CROSSROAD) then the camera could be moved by the time you get there, or you might get the location wrong, or forget by the time you get there. So giving out the precise location might not save the drivers from a ticket and again they just have to slow down and keep a look out.

    What the police might not like is a distributed iphone or android app which broadcasts their location in real time and presents it on a map showing your location. You could have "Police Camera" button on the screen and press it after you go past. But the information is going to get stale fast and police could game the system with cheap decoy speed traps.

    1. Re:But how precise is it? by Moryath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not about safety. It's about money. Speed traps are designed to trick people into a spot where revenue generation occurs.

      There's a spot I know of ~100 miles north of me where a highway marked at 65 off-ramps onto another highway marked at 60. The change in speed isn't marked at the top of the ramp, however, but 3 miles down the road instead. Local sheriffs LOVE to sit at the top of the hill and watch for people doing 65-70, who don't know about the speed change, and then cite them tickets.

      Likewise, my city has a bunch of redlight cameras. And non-coincidentally, right after installing them, someone noticed they could issue a lot more fines if they shortened the yellow light time, despite every available study showing that safety is improved with longer yellow times. They are now getting sued and it's going up to the state supreme court because they shortened the things to .25 seconds below the state required timing in order to beef up ticket revenue, AND they made them "civil fines" rather than actual ticket infractions to try to get around a state law prohibiting cities from getting more than a certain percentage of their funding from traffic fines (a law, ironically enough, passed because of certain little shit-pot one-stoplight towns that were running traffic scams left and right and getting 80-90% of their revenue from issuing insane tickets to out-of-towners).

      Of course, the major problem here is that police - pretty much all of them - are corrupt. They start them on traffic duty, set a ticket quota, tell them to issue tickets by hook or by crook. If they don't meet quota, they get their income screwed with, they don't get a chance at overtime hours, or they get lousy performance reviews. By the time they graduate from issuing traffic tickets any semblance of honor, integrity, or respect for the general population has long ago been trained out of them in favor of the "fuck it, ticket them, cuff them, they're all guilty of something anyways" attitude.

      Show me an honest cop today, and I'll show you a flying pig doing cartwheels next to a unicorn.

    2. Re:But how precise is it? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Speed traps are set up in spots where assholes like you drive balls to the wall every fucking day."

      No, they're set up ONLY at places where there's lots of revenue to be made. I mean, they've literally stopped running red light cameras on intersections because "it's not generating enough revenue". The LAST thing they care about is keeping the public safe. You cannot install a redlight or speed camera under the premise of "keeping things safe" and ethically remove it with the answer of "it's not generating revenue".

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    3. Re:But how precise is it? by Yetihehe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Show me an honest cop today, and I'll show you a flying pig doing cartwheels next to a unicorn.

      This is just a visibility bias. Do you remember the last 10 officers who didn't give you a ticket? But you do remember those who did. There are many honest cops, but they are doing their job and not screwing with citizens so the citizens don't even notice them.

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    4. Re:But how precise is it? by penguinchris · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know I shouldn't feed an anonymous troll but that's bullshit. Speed traps as you seem to define them are reasonable - those are when police cars sit on the highway in plain sight and pull over people going unsafely fast or otherwise driving recklessly. The rest of us define speed traps as the ones where the police set up camp in a place where people are guaranteed to be speeding because either the speed limits are set too low or change without being marked changed (as in the parent's example) or for other reasons.

      I got a speeding ticket a few years ago for going slightly faster than traffic flow (which was already about 10 over the limit)... because I was passing a line of trucks, and was at the bottom of a *huge* hill where everyone inadvertently speeds up - which is right where the police car was waiting. That's a speed trap, and the police set up in those areas to make money, plain and simple. If they were doing their job of keeping the road safe by pulling over people who are actually driving dangerously, no one would complain about them.

      It's true that there are assholes who drive balls to the wall every fucking day, as you eloquently put it, and those people should be pulled over. One doesn't have to be that kind of driver to find major reasons to complain about speed traps, though.

    5. Re:But how precise is it? by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 4, Informative
      Read this article: http://www.safemotorist.com/articles/traffic_ticket_quotas.aspx Among other things, it says that traffic fine quotas are explicitly forbidden in most jurisdictions (USA). Of course, you may be in a jurisdiction that doesn't forbid quotas, or where the local police ignore the rules.

      My second point, is that individual police officers and the police force typically does not get any direct financial benefit for traffic fines. The collected fines generally goes into general government revenue. (In Australia, it is state or territory revenue.) So unless there is a quota system in place, the typically police have no particular incentive to act as revenue raisers.

      My third point is that while traffic fines do raise revenue, appropriate use of speed traps, red light cameras and so on does reduce traffic accidents.

      Finally, a long time ago (when speed cameras were new), I worked in the IT department of an Australian state police force. One of the systems that we ran for the police was a radar trap location planner. One of the inputs into that system was localized road accident statistics from the State's department of main roads.

    6. Re:But how precise is it? by CarpetShark · · Score: 4, Funny

      Show me an honest cop today, and I'll show you a flying pig doing cartwheels next to a unicorn.

      I was going to show you an honest cop, but I've nothing to gain from it, since he already happens to be flying and doing cartwheels next to a unicorn.

    7. Re:But how precise is it? by Moryath · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When there's a freeway underpass the city over from mine where they sit on quota day (and it's pretty fucking obvious it's quota day, no time else do you have 10 pigs parked in the underpass breakdown lane waiting in one spot) trading turns on who gets to pull the next guy over on the radar-gun spotter's call until they have all made quota, in a zone where they pull a speed limit 45-25-45-25-45 trick?

      The locals all know - unless they forget or are brand new teen drivers - to do no more than 30 through that entire zone, because if you get up to 45, there's no way you can hit the brakes and get down to 25 in that distance without locking your brakes and risking a skid.

      It also helps that the locals all have "flood zone" stickers on their cars that serve the "spoken" purpose of allowing them to be in the area during voluntary-evacuation times, but also let the local corrupt pigs know EXACTLY who's from out-of-city for ticketing purposes. I've actually sat in traffic court and watched a city resident get his ticket dropped after a sidebar conversation with the judge about how it was a brand new car and his flood-zone ticket hadn't yet been issued to him.

      So I say no, they're ALL corrupt. No "visibility bias" about it.

    8. Re:But how precise is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slashdot really needs a "like" button.

    9. Re:But how precise is it? by Moryath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Among other things, it says that traffic fine quotas are explicitly forbidden in most jurisdictions (USA).

      And who the fuck is ever going to catch them doing it? The police?

      No, they have "spoken but unwritten" quotas. All the law forbids is actually writing a quota down. It doesn't forbid the local government making a budget based on an expected yearly dollar-amount in fines, and then holding the police department responsible for either making quota or having their budget cut. Nor does it forbid them from writing the cops up for "insufficient zeal in traffic enforcement" (actual words they use on the reviews) for failing to meet the unwritten quota.

      Again, I ask - who's going to report them or enforce it. The police? Yeah right - protest a quota policy and watch how fast no police department will ever hire you again, because you don't play ball with the corrupt policies. Anyone honest enough to not write fraudulent tickets is never going to move up the ladder, only the dirty ones ever get promoted.

    10. Re:But how precise is it? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But those "honest" cops KNOW some of their co-workers are not honest cops, they all know of cases where a colleague fudged an arrest report or claimed that a driver crossed the white line when they didn;t actually, because they had a hunch that the driver was not legitotherwise but had no probable cause to stop them, etc., etc., ALL cops know of these things happening from time to time, yet don't arrest them or report the cops to supervisors or testify on behalf of the other cops' victims.

      So there are no honest cops.

      --
      This space available.
    11. Re:But how precise is it? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You, sir, are a tool. Speeding tickets are all about revenues. I drove over the road for years. I signed a lot of tickets. In my own experience, roughly 1/3 of them were BOGUS. I've read many reports and studies over the years that pretty much support my own experience. Some of them have claimed 20% bogus tickets, others have claimed more than half. All of them COULD be right, depending on when and where the studies and reports originated. I've showed up in court, beat the ticket, only to have the judge tell me that I had to pay a "processing fee" or some such nonsense. In New Mexico, tickets are pretty cheap, but if you go to court, you WILL pay that fine, in one way or another. I've also seen tickets "kept off the record", if you're willing to cough up extra money. That is completely illegal according to FEDERAL law, but it doesn't stop local courts from collecting that graft - errrr - REVENUE! If you are interested in highway safety, you might investigate the "85th percentile" that traffic engineers use to determine safe speed limits. Everything else is a money making scheme.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    12. Re:But how precise is it? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll just add, before someone accuses me of a sort of bias, saying I'm just a leadfoot who wants to speed without consqeuence... BZZZT, wrong!

      I don't drive. I never drive. I have never driven nor owned a car.

      The reason? I am disabled and can't.

      Why am I disabled? Because when I was a teenager crossing the street as a pedestrian I was struck by a speeding pickup truck driver.

      So I think I can reasonably claim that I have no particular bias in favor of traffic scofflaws.

      --
      This space available.
    13. Re:But how precise is it? by dangitman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not about safety. It's about money

      So, if it's about money, then just drive at the speed limit and screw them out of the money. If everybody did this, then the cameras would disappear because revenue would dry up (assuming it is about money).

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    14. Re:But how precise is it? by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Provide me the evidence. Just because you and a bunch of other people believe it is true, doesn't make it true. If it was really happening to any great extent, there would be evidence. Someone, somewhere would be blowing the whistle. (And I don't believe that all cops are corrupt, any more than I believe that all Americans are god fearing.)

    15. Re:But how precise is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.villagevoice.com/2010-05-04/news/the-nypd-tapes-inside-bed-stuy-s-81st-precinct/

      http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/414/right-to-remain-silent

      Just because you and a bunch of other people deny it, doesn't mean it can't happen easily.

    16. Re:But how precise is it? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nobody is free to roam all streets, at least not in any major city. Nor are we free to speak to cops the same way we can speak to civilians. Nor are people with handicaps free to obtain drugs that can help them, for fear that the cops might arrest them.

      Anyone who becomes a cop has suspect morals in my book, at least given the state of our laws and the way police departments operate.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    17. Re:But how precise is it? by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >>>Do you remember the last 10 officers who didn't give you a ticket?

      Yes I do, because I was surprised they did not ticket me. (I speed a lot and in 99% of cases I deserve it.) You made a false assumption here. As for the grandparent post I agree that Speed Laws are about making money. Accidents are not caused by fast driving (500,000 miles and zero accidents for me).

      Accidents are caused by lane changes where one driver misjudged and hit another car. i.e. Zig-zagging i.e. recklessness. Nobody has ever proved that speeding, by itself, caused accidents. Look at the low rate of accidents in places like Montana where 85-90 mph is the norm. Speeding is not what causes accidents. Driver error/recklessness does.

      So basically reducing the speed limit, even as low as 35 on an interstate, will not magically end crashes.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    18. Re:But how precise is it? by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "The police claim he must be getting inside information and suspect that disgruntled traffic officers may be involved."

      Cops know the real score, but they want to keep their job just the same as you & I do. Example: I witnessed my boss taking a government-paid "business trip" but really a Vacation every single week - but I kept my mouth shut because I needed a job.

      If you search around youtube you'll find a few videos from former cops discussing all the corruption they have witnessed, not just in speeding revenue generation but also in general, like entering homes without permission.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    19. Re:But how precise is it? by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      +1 for Cold Hearted Snake.

      You clearly didn't understand the man's point (he's biased in favor of *stricter* traffic law) but were too busy trying to prove him wrong to pay attention.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    20. Re:But how precise is it? by GeigerBC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why don't you call up your local jurisdiction and tell them of your findings? The yellow interval has to be at least 3 seconds long.

    21. Re:But how precise is it? by Jawnn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Personal friend, a cop, shared with me that while his "employer" did not have a quota on traffic citations, it was "expected" that each officer would write at least a certain number per month, lest he receive a poor review for not doing his job. "So," says I, "any given infraction you witness may, or may not, result in a traffic stop and citation, depending on what your numbers are for that month?" "Pretty much", says he.
      Sounds like a quota to me.
      As for the efficacy of red light cameras, please cite your references. AFIK, quite the opposite is true.

    22. Re:But how precise is it? by insufflate10mg · · Score: 4, Funny

      The reason they drop the speed limits is because there is an increased risk of accident/injury in that particular area. If you really have a problem with it, shoot me the street name so I can check out the Google Maps images of the area. I guarantee the speed limit variation is perfectly justified. Also, there is no such thing as quotas for speeding tickets.

    23. Re:But how precise is it? by russotto · · Score: 2

      Do you remember the last 10 officers who didn't give you a ticket?

      Sure. 4 of them were giving other people tickets, one was eating a doughnut, and the other 5 were beating up a member of $ETHNIC for fun.

    24. Re:But how precise is it? by DrugCheese · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are many honest cops, but they are doing their job and not screwing with citizens so the citizens don't even notice them.

      How come we never see them speak up when another cop is under indictment for brutality? You would think a criminal would be a criminal, but if they wear a badge then they're somehow exempt. Any cop who can stand by silently while another cop takes away basic human rights is just as guilty.

      --
      *DrugCheese rants*
    25. Re:But how precise is it? by sjames · · Score: 3

      Are they busy exposing the rampant lawlessness within their department? If not, they are at least partially corrupted into turning a blind eye to a problem that is slowly eating away the foundation of our society.

  2. Keeping us Safe... by lewko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    South Africa has the highest homicide rate in the world.

    It's good to know that the police are concentrating on fast driving.

    No doubt an increasingly broke and hopeless government has learned how to make more money. Err... I mean, save lives.

    --
    Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
  3. Free Speech? by DamienRBlack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Freedom of Speech, you either have it or you don't... Although, I suppose this particular case is a little sticky. Do you think that when people are actively trying to avoid law enforcement, their speech is still protected? I side with the idea that it should still be protected. If someone posts a list labeled "100 best places to drop dead bodies off where they'll never be found", I don't think they've done anything wrong. At least not by posting the list, their research methods may be in question.

    I suppose if it turns out that the tweeter is in fact a cop then they have all the right to fire him as I'm sure it is a breech of contract. But otherwise he/she should have the right. Johannesburg just needs to find better methods and stop their internal leaks, don't take it out on the messenger. Of course, I don't know what the actual laws of Johannesburg are, I'm just considering what they should be.

  4. Racism? For real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On aspect of TFA struck me as awfully peculiar:

    One thing is for certain, though: PigSpotter has deeply offended senior members of the JMPD. Some openly accused him of racism yesterday.

    "This guy's use of words such as 'pigs' and 'bacon rashers' is alarming because you find that most of these officers are black and he is white. Why is nobody talking about this?" a police source said yesterday.

    Is this a South Africanism, the notion of 'pig' being a racial epithet? As an American, 'pig' is a not at all uncommon term for the police; less polite perhaps than 'po-po' or 'Five Oh', but certainly nothing racial. Or is this merely a vague attempt to villify the guy, since the police know they're not exactly going to get the citizenry rallying behind them on this?

  5. Moving the camera ? by thrill12 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think you are overstating the ease with which a camera may be moved. A speed camera has to be aligned exactly (angle/height/equipment etc) to measure the correct and valid speed of a passing vehicle. You cannot simply move it within a few minutes lest your measurements are out of bounds and any ticket you write is invalid - for people that have the energy to fight it before court, that is. I know that is the situation here in The Netherlands at least.
    Actually, announcing speed traps is sometimes done by the police themselves here, and transmitted using a system called "TMC" (traffic message channel). Additionally, radio channels ask people to report them and announce them on RDS.
    But in the end, some speed traps are never announced or the announcement is never received: last week, there was a motor driver who died as a result of a car braking for a speed trap. This could stir up debate that police, like in for example Sweden, are forced to announce the speed trap before it actually occurs.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  6. Re:Racism? For real? by inasity_rules · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dude, its Africa. I've lived in Africa all my life, and people crying "racism" is very normal here. Its just another way of saying, "We don't like what you're doing and the easiest way to get you to go away is to call you a racist and then everyone will hate you."

    It's all very childish. But that's African Politics for you. It is also sad that it distracts from the real racism that nobody ever notices...

    --
    I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
  7. do not feel bad for you by pat+sajak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ffs is it so hard not to speed? unless you have a woman in labor in your vehicle what is your excuse really?

    1. Re:do not feel bad for you by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "It's human nature, and it should be catered for, not stamped out."

      It IS catered for, on race tracks. Not all human nature = good judgement.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  8. Re:Racism? For real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The ruling majority (ANC) are incapable of: (1) Handling any criticism (2) Arguing/debating in a rational manner
    Thanks to our recent history (apartheid) they are left with a large uneducated mass of people who remember only one thing (how bad "racism" is) and will believe what they are told without question. So anytime someone attempts to criticize or make a suggestion on how to do things in a sane way they are simply labeled as a racist and ignored. Due to the unquestioning stupidity of the masses this works every single time leaving little incentive for our utterly useless government to ever improve.

    "Racist" here is the equivalent of accusing someone of being a "pedophile" in America, except on sterioids.

  9. Re:oh that's what I need by penguinchris · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm not disagreeing with you, but if you're in the fast lane and someone is going faster than you, the right thing to do is to move over if you can and let them pass. The other guy's an asshole, yes, but by not moving out of his way you can only make it worse, and that makes you an asshole too.

    Laws vary by location, but generally it's considered that the "fast lane" isn't the lane you use when you're going over the speed limit, it's the lane you use for passing. Assuming we're not talking heavy traffic (or southern California), you should never just be cruising along in the fast/passing lane... if you're not actively passing someone, stick to one of the "slow" lanes.

    The other guy could pass you on the right, but that's usually illegal and a much more dangerous situation. Moving out of the way is as much a safety thing as a not-being-an-asshole thing.

  10. Do people still flash lights in the US? by penguinchris · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I was a kid I remember one of my parents telling me about people flashing their lights on the highway (I-90 thruway in NY) to warn of upcoming hidden police cars, I guess because I noticed someone doing it and asked why. Since that day, though, I don't think I've ever seen anyone do it again, and I've done a lot of highway driving (for my age anyway - driven across the US about five times, and lots of driving in between and at either end). I decided to do it once when I spotted a police car on the opposite side, but I think the people going the same way I was thought I was signaling them instead or indicating that I had a problem or something. Hard to tell since it doesn't seem to be a universal speed trap signal anymore.

    Is it regional? Are there still places where this signal is common knowledge? I ask because the slashdot department line mentions this, and I haven't heard of it since I was a kid, as I said.

    1. Re:Do people still flash lights in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most people in Australia tend to flash if/when they see a cop for several km either side...

    2. Re:Do people still flash lights in the US? by inasity_rules · · Score: 2, Funny

      But the risk is you might get fined for indecent exposure....

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    3. Re:Do people still flash lights in the US? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think most have given up. There was a recent case in PA where the judiciary made it specifically legal to do in the daylight, but at night, you can be cited for wrongful use of high beams.

      I still do it, but nobody else does. When I was a kid, everyone still did it, but by the time I got my license, nobody did (I'm 24).

  11. Re:Racism? For real? by beuges · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is a South Africanism, in that everything here gets turned into a race issue whether it has anything to do with race or not. Despite the fall of apartheid and having a democratically elected government, the new 'leadership' still has a vested interest in creating the perception that whites are still out to get blacks - it's a nice diversion to distract their voters away from the government's corruption and hypocrisy. Everything the ANC seems to do these days creates the impression that they deliberately keep their own supporters beaten down in order to retain their support, blaming the supporters misfortune on racism and 'the legacy of apartheid'. I get the impression that we'll still be blaming apartheid in another 50 years time... that is assuming that the ANC doesn't finally give up all pretenses and just publicly turn the country into another Zimbabwe, rather than trying to do it behind the scenes.

    An unfortunate side-effect of the continuous cry of racism is that a (hopefully small and insignificant) number of the youth of today are growing up indoctrinated with the belief that everything is still a race issue. A key example of this is the leader of the ANC youth league, Julius Malema. While he's generally ridiculed universally for his stupid utterances and ridiculous beliefs, the sad reality is that he actually believes in what the rest of us consider to be drivel. And he is poised to rise into the leadership of the ANC and therefore the country within the next decade or two.

    Every time you read a report of something being connected to racism in South Africa, take it with a grain of salt. Yes, there is still a lot of racism going on, but it's the same sort that you experience anywhere else... nowhere near what we used to have. It's sad to see the ANC that fought so hard to end apartheid is now working so hard to ensure that it prevails.

  12. Yes it is by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What you got to remember is that the world is filled with people with very small penisses who can only think of the world as them vs the state and everyone else.

    They think their car is a source of income for the state when even the simplest look at the figures will show that cars COST the state far more then they pay in road taxes and such things. This in itself is not a problem. Society needs roads and transport but if you start to base your political outlook on a basic misconception (road taxes meet the costs of road construction and maintenance) it all goes wrong. Because then you start thinking that public transport, school and medical facilities must be paid for by their users as well. And not by your traffic fines.

    Even if traffic fines were a serious source of income, as in not just meeting the costs of police but deliviring more! then who cares? What do I care for a tax for assholes. Don't be an asshole and you are not taxed.

    But as you see from the majority of reactions, a lot of people are assholes and come up with bizarre explanations of why they should be allowed to speed.

    It has been proven time and time again that if everybody drove the same speed, as indicated by people who are smarter then you, traffic would flow a lot more smoothly. The ultimate example was given a few years ago in a simulation with cars crossing each other on a busy level intersection with no trouble whatsoever.

    The problem with speeding is NOT wether you can or cannot handle it, but if everyone else on the same road can. Considering cars are the biggest killer out there, it seems clear that people can't.

    But don't worry, the police are all corrupt, you can drive 50 miles over the speed limit and when you kill someone you just shrug it off as an accident.

    Because nobody is reponsible for their own actions and should never face the consequences. Oh and if someone dares to slam their car door in front of your house, the swat team should be called out and a speedbump the height of everest installed to slow those demons down.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Yes it is by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, moron, the cops may cost the government in general money, but that has fuck all to do with the fact it's a huge income source for the local police department.

      And if you haven't noticed, people are bitching about speedtraps, which are the exact opposite of 'everybody drove the same speed'. They are, in fact, 'everyone dangerously drives at different speeds semi-randomly as some people know about the speed limit change, and some people don't, and the police don't want people to know about the change'.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    2. Re:Yes it is by TheGreatHegemon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It has been proven time and time again that if everybody drove the same speed, as indicated by people who are smarter then you, traffic would flow a lot more smoothly

      You do realize the posted speed limit is lower than the speed recommended by people who are smarter than [i]you[/i], right? (Do you automatically assume that we're all dimwitted?)

      Ignore the above point, really, I don't care about surface streets. On most surface streets, I stick to the posted speed limits anyway. However, state speed limits (IE max of 65 in california) has [i]nothing[/i] to do with road conditions. Do you even know why they put that speed limit, or are you just being a righteous prick? (Here's a hint, it wasn't added for safety). Freeway speed limits are detrimental.

  13. Re:Racism? For real? by Raenex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can just get rid of the adjective completely. Politics is childish all the world over.

  14. Re:Racism? For real? by mjwx · · Score: 2, Funny

    Neither America nor Africa are adjectives.

    Racist.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.