Capturing Carbon With Garbage Heaps

davide marney writes "In a Washington Post opinion piece, Hugh Price argues that using a decidedly low-tech solution to sequestering excess carbon — making piles of agricultural waste — is better than many 'green' solutions already in practice. Sometimes the easy answer is the right answer. After all, it's how coal forms, and we know that works pretty well."

Comments

Re:Yeah

[capnkr]

How about I just continue with the plan I came up with over 25 years ago, when even as a child I saw where we were heading, and not reproduce.

Yes, I walk my talk. I haven't, and won't, make additional consumers of Earth's resources. I drive an older, small, efficient car, and keep it up so that it remains that way. I live in a boat made the same year as I was born, 'recycling' it, and do so without air conditioning or television. I use a composting toilet that I made. Etc, etc... Compared to most people, especially the ones who preach at us about 'climate change' and 'carbon credits' and who want to tax me even more, my 'carbon footprint' is non-existant. This 'pot' wishes more 'kettles' were black.

Tell us about yourself there, anon? Do you live what you believe, or do you choose the modern day equivalent of paid absolution?

Re:Yeah

[d3ac0n]

Personally I LOVE it when rabid greenies state so proudly their intention to not reproduce. Why? Because the NON rabid greenies, AKA, the people with good sense, will MASSIVELY out-breed the greenies resulting in their eventual extinction. So yeah, you greenies go ahead and NOT breed. Way to go!