Is the Web Heading Toward Redirect Hell?

Ant snips from Royal Pingdom this excerpt: "Google is doing it. Facebook is doing it. Yahoo is doing it. Microsoft is doing it. And soon Twitter will be doing it. We're talking about the apparent need of every web service out there to add intermediate steps to sample what we click on before they send us on to our real destination. This has been going on for a long time and is slowly starting to build into something of a redirect hell on the Web. And it has a price."

Comments

How do you get offenders to stop?

[alain94040]

Funny just this morning I noticed that it took at least 5 redirects or more for Google to let me login to Analytics. It felt like my browser had a life of its own!

The real problem though are the link shorteners. I'd like to vote with my feet and never click on them, but for many, they are like drugs, because they let you track your influence (how many people clicked) in real-time. It's especially bad on slower connections such as smartphones. Not everyone has 1MB/s.

Any ideas on how to convince people to stop?

--
Don't work on your startup project without a safety net

Re:How do you get offenders to stop?

[TooMuchToDo]

Any ideas on how to convince people to stop?

Create a web service where you can provide a shortened URL and it will respond back with the full URL. Make sure this web service caches the redirect for at least 24 hours. You instantly kill any reason for the redirect to be there (their counts will no longer be accurate).

If someone wants to use this sort of service, I'd be happy to throw it together and provide it for free.

Re:How do you get offenders to stop?

[dyingtolive]

Nice. If that got turned into a firefox plugin to realtime decrypt the links...

Re:How do you get offenders to stop?

[skids]

Not to mention, when a shared medium or statistically multiplexed PtP link of low bandwidth has congestion, latency is higher than on a higher bandwidth link, which has a much shallower queue built up and/or takes less time to wait for the 1500 byte packet that just started being transmitted to get out of the way. The distinction is only really relevant when you're discussing technicals of TCP window scaling and bandwidth delay product. Certainly not to the end user: "slow" is "slow".

Re:How do you get offenders to stop?

[eth1]

Yeah. Load the page as normal, then, in the background, replace the redirects with direct links.

As a bonus, if enough people started using it, it would so bork up the tracking stats (and the load on the redirect servers) that using redirects like that would be less appealing in the first place.

www.linuxtoday.com is the champion

[bogaboga]

Folks at linuxtoday.com have been doing this for a long time. It's one reason I fled the site. Instead of taking me to where I wanna go directly, they make me click twice on the same site. This I believe, enables them to collect 'vital information' to present to their advertisers.

The bad thing is that they lost me and many others in the process.

By the way, it's intentional for me not to link to them from Slashdot directly.

Why it has to be so technically impractical?

[Anonymous Coward]

Less fragile and less of an unnecessary intermediary on this Web 2.0 (or whatever) age would be to catch the click of a link with onclick, set a cookie, and open the original, intended link. When user would again come back to the site, this cookie would be dumped to the site that so much wanted the information it was clicked. Even if the user would have some sort of embedded resource from this site open somewhere else, it could harvest the information and send it back.

Instead, we seem to be ending up with endless chains of redirectors and opaque identifiers that are bound to organizations that don't necessarily exist in a year. What a joy to use technology which is driven by needs of utter morons and greed of those interested to press most information out of the morons...

Re:Techie price greater than luser price

[Spazntwich]

I've noticed this as well, and just consider it the price I have to pay to avoid losing my nerd credentials along with my tiny bank balance.

But it is becoming more prevalent, and I'm not sure what the solution is. Part of me worries this is one of the setup steps in someone's grand scheme to make the internet "dangerous" enough that the "only solution" is to grant absolute internet authority to agency x. You know. To protect the children from all the sexual predators hiding kiddie porn in bit.ly links.

Re:My Idea

[clone53421]

Done.

http://tinyurl.com/25lsp67
http://3.ly/2e5g64f

bit.ly adds its own little blab page if it detects multiple redirects, which is entertaining in its own way I guess... never-ending loop:

http://bit.ly/9bV4Re

The preview feature is fun too...

http://3.ly/RwuW
http://tinyurl.com/k2w9uiz

wasn't there a time....

[bickerdyke]

when it was considered a security hole if you DIDN'T use a redirect on your page? IIRC there used to be an attack vector where malicous sites used links from freemail pages to steel session IDs from the referer-headers.

Re:My Idea

[clone53421]

Infinite recursion that defeats browser infinite recursion detection:

http://3.ly/3x5qdno
http://tinyurl.com/36n5j5y

(the tinyurl long link is <html><body><script>var t=setTimeout('window.location="http://3.ly/3x5qdno";',50);</script></body></html> encoded in a data: URI)