Slashdot Mirror


Man Gets 12-Year Jail Sentence For Planting Child Porn On Enemy's Computer

An anonymous reader writes with an update to a story we discussed in August about Neil Weiner, a man who sought to ruin the life of a school caretaker by planting child pornography on his computer. Weiner has now been convicted on two counts of possession of child pornography and one count of perverting the course of justice. He was sentenced to 12 years in jail. "The judge told Weiner that his plot to have Mr. Thompson sacked and prosecuted very nearly succeeded. Police had been careful not to make public their arrest of the caretaker and only informed those at the school who needed to know, he said. 'But you gratuitously and spitefully informed the local press so that he and his wife suffered the distress of the unwelcome publicity which followed.' Mr. Thompson's health and that of his wife suffered. The judge said: 'There are still those who believe, and probably always will, that he is a pedophile. I am wholly satisfied that Mr. Thompson is innocent.' ... Weiner had discovered the caretaker's password by looking over his shoulder one day and been caught doing so. When Mr. Thompson was asked why he did not change it, he said he wished he had, adding: 'Who in their worst nightmares would could have thought that anyone could stoop to do what he did?'"

6 of 448 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Lethal Weapon VII by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's 3 homicides of prisoners in prison in the UK a year, so clearly they aren't doing a good job of the butchering you expect.

  2. Re:Perverting the course of justice. by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What an appropriate charge. Also, this guy can rot.

    The truly sad thing is that he very well may be rotting alongside victims of the more successful (weren't caught) perverters of justice. Unless, of course, we just assume this is the first time someone has ever attempted this.
     
    It'd be interesting to see what percentage of those convicted of possession of child pornography claimed they were framed/had-no-knowledge-of-the-pornography, and how much effort law enforcement spent in checking the validity of those claims.

    I suspect that the numbers would be pretty damn disappointing/terrifying.

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  3. Re:Lethal Weapon VII by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well I guess that just shows y'all in the UK aren't quite as batshit as we are in the USA over your laws, as a local 20 year old here got 40+ years for having images of CP he snatched off image boards and the like, while the guy down the hall from me only got 6 years for shooting a cop in the belly while freaked out on acid. Here if you have CP you'd be better off popping a cap into the cop and then using the time while they have to call SWAT to get rid of the evidence, as the time will be less. no different than in the 80s Reagan drug scare where all the local dealers of pot started carrying guns so they could shoot the cop rather than get caught with a couple of pounds of weed.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  4. Re:Perverting the course of justice. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In fairness, that's not all GOP'ers, it's primarily those that come from the bible belt or need their electoral votes in Presidential elections.

    Yes, but they are the most vocal and active of the party and are routinely referred to as the "base" of the party.

    They haven't done much,

    You mean nothing. What little they have shrunk has been far outweighed by their gross spending.

    hence the rise of the Tea Party.

    Tthe party of "keep the government out of my Medicare!!", right?

  5. Just got a call from my wife by spun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One of her best friends just called her. This woman's house was just raided by the FBI this morning. Turns out that her boyfriend was into child porn. I've hung out with them, he seemed like a regular guy. I liked him. Now I don't know what to think, or feel. I know I feel a little dirty just from having hung out with him. But I also feel some sympathy, because I know the guy, and before I found this out, I liked him. I can't imagine what his girlfriend is going through. Can you ever take enough showers to feel clean after that?

    I know he had a screwed up childhood. I guess I just didn't know how screwed up. And now I can't help but contemplate his future. It isn't pretty. I'm not saying he doesn't deserve it, kiddie porn is inexcusable. But his life is over now. If I were somehow in his position, I know what I'd do. I know the man owns guns. There aren't many situations where suicide might just be the best answer, but along with painful terminal illness, this is one of them.

    I just feel sick now, I could barely eat lunch today. The wife and I offered to help clean up after the mess the FBI left, tearing up the place. But cleaning the physical mess is only the first step.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  6. Re:Wow. Vindictive much? by spun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No, as I said, I never said it was the "right" thing to do. I said it was the company's right to do so.

    As an example, if a woman dumps you and I say, "Bitch did you a favor," does that mean I think she did the right thing? No, it means, I think it is better you are no longer with her. And no one would argue her right to dump you, obviously she has that right.

    My observations about Fox News were coincidental to the discussion at hand, meaning, it is perhaps a coincidence that both Fox News viewers and the poster are hypocritical and vindictive,

    He was not fired for having the wrong political beliefs. He was let out of his contract for reasons we can only guess at. Contractors can not be fired, they were never employees. If he'd wanted protection, he should have asked for it. He didn't, and now he wants to ruin this person's life because he made a mistake when bargaining for the position. He is stupid, for not asking for what he wanted. He is hypocritical because I have seen him castigate others for not taking personal responsibility, but does not do so here, and he is vindictive because he fantasized about putting kiddie porn on his ex-bosses computer.

    His boss would not merely be fired if he planted kiddie porn on her computer, and you know it.

    And once again, I must point out that he wasn't fired. As a contractor, he was never an employee. He was a supplier of services, an independent business that did work for another business. If he wanted the protections that come with being an employee, he should have become an employee, not a contractor.

    I have no sympathy because, and this bears repeating, commodore64_love fantasized about putting kiddie porn on his ex-bosses computer for revenge.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton