Slashdot Mirror


UK Pursues Tax Evaders Using Stolen Bank Details

Andrew Smith writes "The UK taxman (HM Revenue & Customs) is reportedly using a stolen list of bank details to pursue wealthy individuals with off-shore accounts. The list was stolen by an employee of HSBC, and gave details of the bank's customers with money in Swiss accounts. The bank employee fled to France, and the authorities there passed the details on to the UK tax collection agency."

7 of 315 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Two Wrongs. . . by Valacosa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're right. Taxes are evil and useless. Everyone knows that the infrastructure which enables modern civilization, like roads and plumbing, are paid for with leprechaun gold.

    And the military to defend that civilization is created with pixie dust.

    --
    "Live as if you'll die tomorrow." Ridiculous. You could die later today.
  2. Re:Remember kids, UK stole nothing by johanatan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But, information wants to be free!

  3. Re:Two Wrongs. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    However, we lived in a fucked up world where the harder you work and the more successful you are, the more you're punished and you lose an ever increasing percentage of your income.

    Are you referring to the Working Class who can't afford Creative Accountants, lawyers, political lobbyists, and secret "off-shore" bank accounts?

  4. Re:Remember kids, UK stole nothing by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not "stolen" according to the definition in the Theft Act, so it's not receiving stolen property.

  5. Re:Two Wrongs. . . by LordLucless · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You do not that the police are reactive, not proactive don't you? That it has been determined (in the US anyway) that the police have no obligation to protect an individual? That the vast majority of burglaries go uninvestigated? That modern police forces have existed only since the middle of last millenia, and that the concept of private property extends far before that? You realise that the situation in Zimbabwe is caused by the government printing new notes, that fiat currencies depending on the stability of government are relatively new, and have been preceded by millenia of stable currency based on natural scarcity?

    Some government services are necessary; taxes to support them are necessary. And a fraction of the taxes that are collected actually go towards paying for those necessities.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  6. Re:That's Why... by evilviper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In Canada it take 4 people to pay for the job of 1 civil servant. It's probably around 6:1 in the US

    Well I would certainly hope the government doesn't have a tax-rate of 100%, which would be necessary (in most cases) for 1 person to pay the salary for 1 civil servant...

    government makes no money, it creates no money, all it does it take and spend another persons.

    Government isn't supposed to "make money". It's supposed to provide the services we all need to survive, and aren't efficient to provide on an individual basis. I'd sure like safety, but I can't really afford my own private police force. International trade is nice, but I can't afford a navy. In so much as providing safety and stability CREATES MONEY, most governments do exactly that, with your taxes.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  7. Re:Two Wrongs. . . by martin-boundary · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Oh, Bill Gates makes more money, so we'll take some of his and give it to AC so that AC can buy the things he wants without working to earn the money for them"

    That's an interesting bias you have. You do realize that Bill Gates doesn't actually earn his money either? He built a company, and it's the people in that company who earn his money for him today. He just owns shares. So in a specific sense, he's actually doing what you're accusing the AC of doing.

    Maybe you'd find it easier to accept that you have to pay taxes if you think of them as shares that the government owns in your labour.