Slashdot Mirror


RIM Doesn't Want 200 Fart Apps

andylim writes "Just when you thought it was safe to dev a fart app for a BlackBerry, RIM's VP of platform product management, Alan Panezic, is making it clear that that's not want RIM is looking for. 'We don't need 200 fart apps in App World. Those are apps you'll use three or four times then never open again. You're not looking at ads, clicking on ads or buying premium upgrades, and the app isn't adding any value to your device.' Turns out RIM wants 'SuperApps', ones that keep you coming back for more because they add something to your life — be it ongoing entertainment value or doing something for you. Most importantly for developers, these are the apps that will garner the most revenue; whether it comes from premium upgrades, in-app advertising, or additional-cost content."

4 of 244 comments (clear)

  1. Re:deny the developers by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well we don't want to see the once proud, but now impoverished, Fart app industry of the EU be killed off for good by this move.

  2. Re:deny the developers by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh and the EU will definitely need to work out the branding rights to a fart app. We want them to make sure that everyone knows that only a genuine fart app can be labeled as a "fart" app. We don't want the consumers to be confused by people passing off imitation "phart" apps as the real thing.

  3. Re:Why as a business user I switched away from RIM by swb · · Score: 1, Troll

    Do they actually prefer it, or do they prefer it because they have this massive investment in equipment, software, licensing and people skills to support BlackBerry?

    I sometimes wonder if it's not that they want or even use all the stuff BlackBerry offers, but they bought into it big and it would be painful to have to support something else.

    AFAICT, abandoning BlackBerry means ditching BES and all the bullshoot associated with BES installs, and using ActiveSync instead (since it's a 99.99% certainty we're talking MS Exchange here).

    Perhaps some portion of corporate installs actually need/want the BES infrastructure, but in my experience most of the places I've worked (smaller installs, 25-100 handhelds) don't use them and are constantly hammered for requests to support ActiveSync devices.

  4. Re:Farts aside... by McNihil · · Score: 0, Troll

    Nobody found this funny? Damn what a tough crowd today. Boooooooooobs! Boooooobies! See! Shake Shake Shake... Wobble wobble wobble.... ahhhh!