Slashdot Mirror


"Pre-Crime" Comes To the HR Dept.

storagedude writes "Like something out of the Steven Spielberg movie Minority Report, a startup called Social Intelligence is mining social media to weed out job applicants based on their potential for violence, drug abuse or just plain bad judgment. The startup also combs sites like Facebook and Twitter to monitor current employees, presumably to monitor compliance with company social media policy, but as the criteria are company-defined, anything's possible. Just one more reason to watch what you post, folks."

11 of 554 comments (clear)

  1. Learn To Cheat by b4upoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Create a persona that is unbelievably wonderful. Give that persons a handle and its own email account. Then if you are asked if you go online give them that persona's handle and email address. Your live in uncle must own all those other handles and he uses your PC a lot. But you are the one who constantly emails about rescuing orphans and stray dogs and cats and attends all patriotic functions ad nauseum.

  2. Re:The more reason to legislate against it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Guess what? You are advertising yourself.
    You agreed to it when you signed up.
    You agreed to it when you decided posting your life on line was a good idea.
    Not only to future employers but to the marketers who are sold your data from Facebook, Twitter, et al.

    You already sold your right to privacy by:
    a) agreeing to the terms of service.
    b) thinking there are no consequences for permanent and historical archiving your stupidity.

    Companies already have the option to fire you for most any reason they see fit. You've just now made it easier.

  3. Re:If you are smart you will cheat. by hedwards · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They do, however there are limitations on what they can do. They can require a drug screening and back ground check, references, but something like this is questionable at best.

    Basically sounds to me like their trying to find a legal way of going back to pre-affirmative action times and hire people based upon things other than fit and qualification. Perhaps I'm a bit cynical, but this looks like a convenient way to not hire minorities.

  4. Choices by Andy+Smith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just one more reason to watch what you post, folks

    Or one more reason to make ethical career choices, such as not working for a company that doesn't respect your right to a private life.

  5. Thats a great idea by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The hardest thing about being in HR is justifying your existence. The HR department where I work spits out a constant stream of useless projects, purely so they can claim to be doing something. For example we have a program to encourage employees to find people to apply for jobs at our company, but there are no positions open to apply for. The list goes on.

    Snake oil products like this are ideal for HR. They take maybe a fifth of an HR person to administer, so it looks great on the HR managers resume (always looking for that next job, go home and update your resume). They use money (administered a budget of $DOLLARS, also great on the resume). They sound like a good idea. Its sounds really web 2.0 and hip to be involved. Really, it can't fail.

    It just won't work.

  6. Re:The new "rationality" test. I support this test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The thing is, more people get caught in the crossfire for no reason. For example your boss might object to your political stance, or he might not like you being a atheist, or he might think you're a drunk when there's only one picture of you at your birthday. Maybe he sees you dressed as a woman at a halloween party and fires you because he's homophobic. If your name is John Smith, good luck cleaning up your online identity.
    Sure, some of those things are technically illegal reasons for firing, but really, in the US it isn't that hard to fire you for any reason (sometimes even no reason). Until the position descriptions have "24hr company representative and diplomat" in them (with appropriate pay), what you do on your own time and dime is your business. This just smacks of companies trying to squeeze people by the balls even harder.

  7. Re:The new "rationality" test. I support this test by Angst+Badger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And best of all, you can find out things through Facebook that you are prohibited by law from asking your employees. Want to discriminate against employees on the basis of religious or political beliefs? Gotcha covered!

    It's highly focused on what actually matters.

    What actually matters is job performance, period.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  8. Credit should go to Phillip K. Dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Shouldn't we be giving credit to Phillip K. Dick for authoring this story idea instead of Spielberg who, undoubtedly, has enough credits to his name and merely directed this film?

  9. I am forced to reference this in all similar cases by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    FUCK. THAT. SHIT.

    That is all.

    (Goddamn filters for caps.)

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  10. Re:And if the information is wrong or fake by characterZer0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm continually surprised how many /.ers are really right wing, pro-corporate, anti-union, anti-tax freeloaders. 40 years of "government is bad" has become a lifestyle for a lot of people here.

    They are right-wing, anti-union, anti-high-tax citizens. The left wing faction unfairly tacks on "pro-corporate" and "anti-tax freeloaders" to demonize them.

    --
    Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
  11. Re:And if the information is wrong or fake by misexistentialist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    40 years of bad government has a way of doing that