Slashdot Mirror


Safety Commission To Rule On Safety of Rulers In Science Kits

The Consumer Product Safety Commission has been trying decide for weeks if science kits designed to teach children are safe enough for children to use without vigorous testing. It's not just the chemicals or sharp items in the kits that they are troubled with however. They are also concerned about the dangers of paper clips, magnets, and rulers. From the article: "Science kit makers asked for a testing exemption for the paper clips and other materials. The commission declined to grant them a blanket waiver as part of the guidance the agency approved Wednesday on a 3-2 vote." To be fair, paper clips can cause a lot of damage — just look at what Clippy did to Microsoft Office.

13 of 446 comments (clear)

  1. Does this mean... by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ....that the "My First Meth Lab" is probably never going to reach store shelves?

  2. Re:And people wonder why the US is falling behind by Ltap · · Score: 4, Funny

    A better question might be: "Is our children learning?"

    --
    Yet Another Tech Blog
    (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
    http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
  3. Some rulers are dangerous by Storebj0rn · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's clearly irresponsible to expose kids to some rulers; Saddam Hussein, Joseph Stalin and under certain conditions George W Bush

    --
    "Windows are for cheaters" - Bruce Springsteen
  4. Sloppy by symes · · Score: 3, Funny

    I must say that I find the concerns raised by the Consumer Product Safety Commission to be lacking. They haven't, for example, considered the considerable harms posed by the science kits manual itself. The risk of a paper cut is considerable.

  5. Re:Buy Now! by sureshot007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now comes with Science Rock !

    * Warning - Science Rock is not for use with actual science.

  6. The federal commission of me agrees by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Funny

    The federal commission of me agrees: science should be banned in the USA, so should be the last remnants of common sense; any display of individuality and unhealthy interest in any particular subject need to be investigated to establish the safety of such behavior as it relates to the society in total.

    Everything must be made not just safe enough, but safe with a huge margin of error so that there is no chance of any accident happening ever at all. Of-course accidents are mostly responsible for a large number of scientific discoveries, so any evidence of scientific discovery must be investigated to isolate the main reason and find out where the safety procedures have failed to prevent such an occurrence to make sure it never happens again.

    Have a safe day.

  7. Re:Can't you simulate a chemistry set with softwar by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's all fun and games until somebody is garroted by a peripheral cable... all the more reason to go wireless I suppose. But then you have hazardous batteries and nutjobs who think that very low power radio transmitters are going to give them cancer. You just can't win.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  8. Re:Can't you simulate a chemistry set with softwar by mysidia · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just wait 'til you get to the chapter on Darwin and Natural Selection?

  9. It's like magic... by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Funny

    F*cking Rulers, How Do They Work?

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  10. Re:Can't you simulate a chemistry set with softwar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    a strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

  11. Re:Can't you simulate a chemistry set with softwar by ZFox · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did they keep misspelling colour and centre and have trouble locating the boot of a car?

  12. Re:And people wonder why the US is falling behind by kalirion · · Score: 2, Funny

    They isn't. The illiteracy level of our children are appalling

  13. Re:And people wonder why the US is falling behind by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well? Is they?