Slashdot Mirror


Iran Arrests Alleged Spies Over Stuxnet Worm

kaptink writes "Reports surfacing from Iran claim 'nuclear spies' have been arrested over the infection at the Busheher nuclear station, which opened in August. According to Intelligence Minister Heydar Moslehi, because Stuxnet is so sophisticated, cost so much to write and uses two stolen security certificates, he believes only a national intelligence agency or a huge private company could have devised it, calling them 'enemies' spy services."

22 of 261 comments (clear)

  1. The country that cried wolf by istartedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They may be right this time, but who will believe them? For those living under a rock, I'm referring to the 3 American hikers who allegedly strayed over the border from Kurdish Iraq, two of which are still being held as spies.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:The country that cried wolf by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know what they allege that those they have arrested have done

      They're probably charged with 'Breathing Iranian Air without Governmental Permission' which usually results in a sentence that prevents them from becoming repeat offenders.

    2. Re:The country that cried wolf by Incadenza · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No USian not on government or military business has any reason to be where they were.

      Except maybe for the beautiful landscape and friendly people? Unlike most commenters here, I did hike in Iran. There are no maps there, or trails, you just have to go by spoken directions ("take a taxi to XYZ and then head south for two days"). Which means you can get horribly lost.

      And info on the safety situation can be just as fuzzy, people in the cities (worldwide) have no idea what the situation in the mountain is, but will give you their personal fabricated opinion as a fact.

      Personally I would be most worried about anti personel mines that are scattered throughout the border region. Against Iraqi troops, fugitives, and smugglers.

      But Iraq is a big country, and can be hell on one spot and perfectly safe on another. As a matter of fact, just spoke someone last week who had just returned from a climbing trip in Afghanistan. Not being a couch potatoe does not equal to being a CIA agent

    3. Re:The country that cried wolf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why in the hell would the CIA send three very obviously non-Iranian looking Americans hiking around the Iranian border?

      You're an idiot to think they have anything to do with the CIA. They are were "caught" after visiting the Ahmed Awa waterfall, which happens to be only a few miles from the Iranian border. They are nothing more than a bunch of hippie activists who were stupid enough to wander into a questionable area.

  2. Bah! by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If it were targeted at Iran's nuclear sites by a hostile foreign government, they'd have been a lot more stealthy about it and waited until the thing was in operation to trigger a catastrophic melt-down. I'm sure that the reason it's most prevalent in Iran is due to lax security practices and not some conspiracy against them.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Bah! by plover · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A catastrophic meltdown benefits nobody. It wouldn't be sufficient to wipe out all of Iran's military capabilities and it would likely cause them to reflexively strike Israel. Not good.

      It would destroy their plant, their centrifuges, and their current ability to enrich uranium, and would give them a giant, expensive mess to clean up. They know if their plant were to be destroyed they would be seen internationally as stupid buffoons incapable of safely executing nuclear tasks, when their goal is to be seen as a mature modern nuclear power who should be taken seriously.

      A meltdown would likely cost them ten years to recover from, and the current regime may be too fragile to survive it.

      Iran is not a completely crazy country. Sure, the leadership is run by corrupt figures who use religious zealotry to organize the poor in order to remain in power, but that's no different than many Western countries. But many Iranians are middle class kinds of people, not the raving lunatics who want to nuke the rest of the world like they portray on TV. It's certainly possible that if the current leaders were to stumble on the national stage that the poor might see them for who they are, and violently remove them from power.

      --
      John
    2. Re:Bah! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm glad that this worm didn't cause a meltdown. I have 'Homer leaves a donut in the reactor core' in the Meltdown Pool and would hate to lose my $10 to some governmental conspiracy that isn't even playing.

    3. Re:Bah! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nuclear reactors are built with multiple redundancy to the point that failure is inconceivable.

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    4. Re:Bah! by klingens · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This newsarticle is pure BS. The attack didn't target Bushehr: when Stuxnet became public, Bushehr wasn't even online yet. Stuxnet targeted the iraniane Uranium enrichment facilities in Natanz and presumable other, secret, places. Those all use Siemens PLCs too and the code in Stuxnet for the PLCs is actually geared to break those centrifugues. It's also a much more sensible target IT wise: all the centrifuges are controlled by the same PLCs, the same programs running on each PLC for each centrifuge.
      Corroberating this is that in early 2009 shortly after Stuxnet was known, Iran publically suffered a big setback in nuclear enrichment and the government official in charge of the nuclear program was let go.
      So Stuxnet was successful in its mission to disrupt the nuclear program and heads rolled in Iran while some unspecified intelligence agencies got high fives all around.

    5. Re:Bah! by Beelzebud · · Score: 4, Informative

      Follow the money.

      The tea party has never been a grass roots org. Launched by a stock exchange trader on CNBC throwing a fit, and funded by Dick Armey's Freedom Works; the tea party has always been the Republican Party.

    6. Re:Bah! by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your post is more or less the wired article linked to a last week. Nataz was certainly targeted by Stuxnet. That said, the news article isn't BS. The news article is reflecting what the Iranians are doing: using Stuxnet to arrest and jail undesirables and furthering their "us vs them" ideology that keeps them in power. Any accident at any plant going forward will not be a sign of incompetence but a sign that western powers are targeting Iranians.

      Anyone that pissed off someone in power at Bushehr is now a spy and will be executed. They'll also probably arrest some foreigners and use them to trade for real spies of their own caught overseas. That's how these oppressive regimes work. Theocracy isnt a valid form of government.

  3. "only a national intelligence agency" by ebcdic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So called security experts - most of them in fact peddlers of software who depend on the fear of malware for their incomes - are not unbiased commentators. Remember how USL claimed that Unix was too complicated for Berkeley grad students to have replicated without copying their proprietary code? And SCO claimed that Linux couldn't possibly be that good without belonging to them? In fact, there's no software "so sophisticated" that it can't be produced by a bunch of sufficiently dedicated geeks.

    It's an argument particularly appealing to conspiracy theorists - look at how the authors of "The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail" insisted that no-one would expend the effort to forge the documents they relied on, even after the hoax was admitted. You just can't judge this kind of thing on that basis.

  4. Eh.. by Renraku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rest assured, you'll never catch those in charge. I doubt there are names on it. Maybe an agency, but they aren't going to be dumb enough to step into Iran. Iran is simply using these arrests as as political tool to further their own goals.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  5. How come Iran can do it when others can't? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    See the thing is Iran is so efficient on on catching crooks (whether they are actually guilty of the crime the are charged with or not) while the rest of the world seems to lag way behind.

    Why?

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:How come Iran can do it when others can't? by Redlazer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's the nice thing about not having a justice system.

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
    2. Re:How come Iran can do it when others can't? by gtall · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Allah is one weird entity. Apparently, under traditional Muslim belief, Allah is so other that one can never communicate with It directly. Errr...so how do they explain Muhammad? Dunno. Anyhow, Muslims are fond of saying "if Allah wills it" to apply to any of their wishes. Okay, so..this Allah entity, he apparently willed Jews to create modern Israel? Or the Saudi royal family? Or forces making Muslims "victims" in the modern world? The schism between Sunnis and Shi'ites? What about the Alawis, Sufis, or any of the other innumerable Islamic sects?

      If Allah is so just, how to explain the status of women in the Islamic world? What about the infidels? Islam is supposed to be a tolerant religion. Okay, where are the Christian churches in Saudi Arabia or the Jewish Temples? How come the Ba'hai are persecuted in Iran? What's with the Fatwas for killing whomever the Fatwa-er deems deserving of death? If Allah is It's cracked up to be, how come It cannot defend Its own turf and must rely on Muslims to do Its dirty work? And if It is so other, how can Muslims be relied on to interpret what It wants?

    3. Re:How come Iran can do it when others can't? by Ihmhi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Allah is one weird entity. Apparently, under traditional Muslim belief, Allah is so other that one can never communicate with It directly. Errr...so how do they explain Muhammad? Dunno.

      I'm not religious, but I'm a student of religion. According to legend, Muhammad was recited the passages of the Koran by the arch-angel Gabriel (acting as an intermediary of sorts I suppose). I don't believe Muhammad ever talked directly to god.

      Anyhow, Muslims are fond of saying "if Allah wills it" to apply to any of their wishes. Okay, so..this Allah entity, he apparently willed Jews to create modern Israel? Or the Saudi royal family? Or forces making Muslims "victims" in the modern world? The schism between Sunnis and Shi'ites? What about the Alawis, Sufis, or any of the other innumerable Islamic sects?

      The same B.S. so many other religious espouse... "God works in mysterious ways." It's childishly easy to come up with a reason for god letting these things happen. Persecution as a test of faith. Let an enemy rise to power so they have someone to conquer and become stronger. Etc. etc. Typically it's all "test of faith" as the usual reason.

      If Allah is so just, how to explain the status of women in the Islamic world? What about the infidels? Islam is supposed to be a tolerant religion. Okay, where are the Christian churches in Saudi Arabia or the Jewish Temples? How come the Ba'hai are persecuted in Iran? What's with the Fatwas for killing whomever the Fatwa-er deems deserving of death? If Allah is It's cracked up to be, how come It cannot defend Its own turf and must rely on Muslims to do Its dirty work? And if It is so other, how can Muslims be relied on to interpret what It wants?

      Women get the short end of the stick because, well, it's a power and control thing. Lots of religions had it (and still have it), although Islam is the only major religion that suppresses so many minority and women's rights so egregiously.

      As for why Muslims have to do God's dirty work, well... the same reason that the Crusaders did god's work (in their view). If there is a god he's either unwilling or unable to influence the world on a large scale.

      As for the inconsistencies in logic, well, that's Religion 101 for you. Logical fallacies left and right. Thankfully the majority of Muslims are moderates, otherwise we'd have car bombs and Jihadists everywhere. After all, you don't see evangelical Christians blowing up Planned Parenthoods and headshotting abortion doctors every day, do you?

    4. Re:How come Iran can do it when others can't? by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...otherwise we'd have car bombs and Jihadists everywhere. After all, you don't see evangelical Christians blowing up Planned Parenthoods and headshotting abortion doctors every day, do you?

      Dunno. We're pushing nearly 18k terrorist attacks by muslims since 9/11, that's quite a few. And if you take a look in various parts of the APCR where it's supposed to be moderate, you sure do see a lot of jihadi's, public whipping, and 'ankle' laws.

      And well, you don't. Mostly because mainstream christianty keeps evangelical's in check, they might spout the crazy but the rest don't let them go any further.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  6. Re:They don't say who they think it is by san · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Iran is a ratified signatory to the Nuclear Non-Profileration Treaty, so: they certainly don't have the right to develop nuclear weapons or even nuclear facilities except with IAEA oversight. Iran's nuclear activity is pretty clearly in contravention of this (they built a nuclear facility in secret near Qom, for example), and there are now several UN sanctions in force against Iran because of this.

    Is it 'Western hubris' to demand that a country abide by treaties it ratified? Especially a treaty on a matter as important as nuclear armament...

    The reason the West is so hostile to the possibility of a nuclear Iran is that the only peaceful doctrine nuclear weapons allow, MAD, assumes rational actors on all sides. In Iran that rationality might well be subservient to theology.

  7. Re:They don't say who they think it is by jbengt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Admittedly I didn't know much about Stuxnet until after reading more about it and it seems to me just yet another windows virus that hasn't until now been discovered and mistakenly spread via contractors laptops. . . .
    Seems to me that this worm wasn't designed for a specific target and is like any other virus..

    From what I've read, it was specifically written to infect Siemens controllers, root them so it could change the control algorithms while displaying the proper algorithms when polled. The controllers are located at each piece of equipment, typically running independently, each with a minimal OS, if any. They are connected in a local network to allow communication and central monitoring and adjustment.. Stuxnet only used Windows vulnerabilities as a vector to get onto the front-end workstations in order to load into the controllers through the local network.

  8. Re:Bullshit: what about Pakistan and Israel? by blackpaw · · Score: 4, Informative

    Israel is noticeably, quite literally, greener than its neighbours.

    That's why they deserve that land, they take better care of it.

    Bullshit. Israel is destroying it - this "making the desert bloom" crap is destroying the water aquifers there which is one of reasons Israel is pulling so many provocative actions with Lebanon, they want an opportunity to seize access to the Litani river.

    The Palestinians have literally spent centuries developing olive grove orchards which are very sustainable in desert climes. Then "settlers" bulldoze them down and plant Orange groves and other such water intensive plants such as Celery, exhausting the local aquifers, leaving just a fraction of water they've pissed in for the Palestinians.

  9. Re:Bah! Silly by DCFusor · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As one of the Tea Party from near the beginning, nope, that's not me. I'm not a corporatist, not rich, not a religious conservative, none of the above.

    What was started by people who just wanted their constitution back, of course has drawn attempts from all over to co-opt it in some way. Duh....don't you know how things work?

    Even on NPR...they had an "interview" with a Texas woman who was a real tea party organizer, and cut in with some dude who was one of those religious wing nuts (only a member of the tea party, so he said) who basically, right there on the air threatened that if the tea party didn't go his way (org of family something or other) they'd pull out. She said, fine -- you are welcome here, it's a big tent, but nope, we're not going to push your particular cause for you, why not go try and convince the NRA to push laws against abortion -- you're in the wrong place.

    Though NPR is showing signs of seeing blood in the water and not as much a cheerleader of the current majority in government as before, this was their big attempt to discredit the tea party, and it failed pretty badly I think.

    When something like that comes from nowhere and threatens the incumbency machine that is the rebuplocrats -- sure, there's going to be a s**t storm of attempts to discredit it, again, doh.

    If either the dems or the repubs were "for the people" would there be the mickey mouse copyright law? Would pot still be illegal? Wouldn't someone at least have gone to jail over the economic issues? I'm too lazy to type the other five hundred examples, do some homework.

    You might not like the tea party, and for sure it has collected some whack jobs -- big tents do that.

    Wouldn't a bunch of crazy incompetents do a better job than the current batch of well connected thieves?

    I rest my case.

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!