Should ISPs Cut Off Bot-infected Users?
richi writes "There's no doubt that botnets are a major threat to the safety and stability of the internet — not to mention the cleanliness of your inbox. After years of failure to act, could we finally be seeing ISPs waking up to their responsibilities? While ISPs can't prevent users getting infected with bots, they are in a superb position to detect the signs of infection. Contractually, the ISP would be reasonably justified in cutting off a user from the internet, as bot infection would be contrary to the terms of the ISP's acceptable-use policy."
Your name is almost an anagram to Xanax, which, by the looks of it, you need a lifetime supply of.
A more serious question should be, why don't we just cut off China and Russia, the botnet controllers, from the Net?
That would make more sense.
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
Cable and DSL home networks shouldn't be RUNNING mail servers. If we blocked the ports for home mail servers altogether, it would eliminate half the reason for creating botnets in the first place.
Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
How am I supposed to get my computer fixed if I get completely cut off from the Internet?
Since you have proven yourself incapable of keeping your computer secure without supervision, you call tech support, and follow their detailed instructions to the letter. They're probably idiots, too, of course, but you (the generic you, whose account has been cut off) have proven to be so.
This forces the infected (and probably clueless) user to do something instead of just letting their compromised machine spew spam and malware relentlessly.