Slashdot Mirror
Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4?
Julie188 writes "The sales pitch was that IPv6, with its zillions of new IP addresses, would eliminate the need for network address translation altogether. But Jeff Doyle, one of the guys who literally wrote the book on IPv6, suggests that not only will NAT be needed, but it will be needed to save IPv4 at the tipping point of IPv6 adoption. 'I've written previously that as we make the slow — and long overdue — transition from IPv4 to IPv6, we will soon be stuck with an awkward interim period in which the only new globally routable addresses we can get are IPv6, but most public content we want to reach is still IPv4. Large Scale NAT (LSN, also known as Carrier Grade NAT or CGN) is an essential tool for stretching a service provider's public IPv4 address space during this transitional period.'"
You know... you really should upgrade your toaster.
Or - get off my internet.
I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
Your UID is also the model number for the first mouse I ever bought for my C64. Eh, memories.
You know there's probably a reason we haven't heard anything from them. :)
Are you betting on the ipv4 space usage magically decreasing ( right when everyone will start freaking out about getting their last allocations )?
No no, there is always more to be found. That link of yours only show the _known_ reserves of addresses. They continue to find new fields of IP addresses and existing fields continue to find more than initially expected. This "peak IP" is never going to happen and you know it!
And the rest of the internet is giving it away to anyone who can access it with an ipv4 address. Fail!
---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"
Haven't you heard? The IAB has known for decades that the default-free zone is continually making new IPv4 addresses as a natural function of the BGP protocol. The reason you've never heard about it is the evil telecom companies control the media and the NRO, and they don't want you to know the truth.
jhw
Using "!=" in prose isn't grammatically acceptable in third-grade English class, FWIW.
Someone had to do it.
Um, everybody?
It's what we should have done 8 years ago in a firmware flash.
Add 2 octets to the front of ipv4.
1.1.x.x.x.x = the entire current internet.
Any new addresses start at 1.2.x.x.x.x
All the way up to 254.254.254.254.254.254.
What's that? Around 250 trillion IP's?
Sure beats the 4bn we're at now.
Sure, it's not as elegant as IPv6, and it has all the problems of IPv4, but shit, we would have another 50 years or more to play with and no dodgy NAT solutions.
The best thing is, every device ever made could have had a relatively straight forward firmware flash.
But 99% of the people might not notice. They could give 99% of their customers NAT'ed service, and when someone calls and complains, apologize, and offer them a unique public ip for $500 extra per month, or if they upgrade to a "business class line" that permits them to have a dedicated static, addressable IP.
FTFY