Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Apple Accepts, Then Rejects BitTorrent iPhone App

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the make-up-yer-mind-wouldja dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Apple recently approved an iPhone app called IS Drive, which lets users check and manage downloads from ImageShack.us, while also offering users the option to use the company's BitTorrent service to download files to their ImageShack account. Once Apple got wind of what the app was capable of, however, it was promptly removed from iTunes."

3 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Seems strange they approved it at all by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple keeps an iron grip over apps. It's weird that they would approve something like Bittorrent at all!

    From TFA ...

    Kepner theorized that the app was able to sneak in past Apple’s censors because he avoided using the word “torrent.” Well played, Sir Kepner. Well played.

    So, the way he described it, they didn't quite realize what it was actually doing. The reasoning from Apple was:

    this category of applications is often used for the purpose of infringing third party rights. We have chosen to not publish this type of application to the App Store.

    I can see why they don't want to get embroiled in any of the legal stuff associated with Torrents. While they do have non-infringing uses, I can see a company like Apple just deciding they don't want to risk the legal actions which could result.

    The *AAs aren't above suing absolutely everyone who had anything to do with distributing anything which can be/is used to do filesharing. Apple doesn't want to jeopardize their iTunes contracts by appearing to support that.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  2. Re:How many types are secretly banned? by Thinine · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, Apple recently released all of their criteria publicly, and this standard was on that list. http://developer.apple.com/appstore/guidelines.html

  3. Obious Reason by whisper_jeff · · Score: 5, Insightful
    To everyone planning on blasting Apple for rejecting the app, please check the submission guidelines they recently published. The reason this app was rejected is spelled out in clear detail there - the developer has nobody to blame but themself for the app's rejection. They knew they were submitting an app that wouldn't be approved because they hid certain functionality, which is precisely the reason the app was going to be rejected.

    2.4 Apps that include undocumented or hidden features inconsistent with the description of the app will be rejected.

    When you do something against the rules and get caught, don't be surprised that there are consequences. Don't want to play by those rules, then don't. That simple.