Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Facebook Patents Location Social Networking

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the wish-i-thought-of-locations dept.

bizwriter writes "Facebook just received a patent with broad claims that would seem to cover much of what Google (GOOG) Latitude, Foursquare, Gowalla, and others try to do in letting users share their locations with others. Patent number 7,809,805, called 'Systems and methods for automatically locating web-based social network members,' covers people manually entering a status, sending that and their location from a wireless device, and sharing both the status and location with others. Facebook's corporate value just took a big jump — and a number of other companies might have to either challenge the patent's validity or consider licensing deals."

3 of 120 comments (clear)

  1. /. fails again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    How is it that every time a patent article is posted slashdot never posts the claims and always posts something from the abstract or the title which gives the patent holder no rights at all. The first claim is "1. A method of sharing locations of users participating in a social networking service at a geographic location, the method executed by a computer system and comprising: receiving location information and status information from a mobile device of a first user of the social networking service, the location information representing a geographic location of the first user, the status information manually provided by the first user on an input module of the mobile device; associating the location information with the status information of the first user in a database; and sending the status information and the location information of the first user to a second user for display. "

    While that claim is still pretty broad it isn't nearly as broad as the thing posted in the summary.

    Maybe some day /. will understand how to look at a patent but it probably won't be any time soon.

    1. Re:/. fails again by Theaetetus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Problem is my old website had the capability to do ALL of this before it went under. Our newer reincarnation does not have this built in, but I still have the full database from my old website from 5 years ago. Would this count as prior art against the patent?

      Prove it. You can send prior art to the USPTO to consider.

  2. prior art everywhere by sciasbat · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is patent is so silly that prior art can be found anywhere. For example XMPP folks have specs initially published in 2003 describing the same exact scenario:

    http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0080.html (User Location)

    This document defines a format for capturing data about an entity's geographical location (geoloc). The format defined herein can describe most earthbound geographical locations, especially locations that may change fairly frequently. Potential uses for this approach include:

    Publishing location information to a set of subscribers.
    Querying another entity for its location.
    Sending location information to another entity.
    Attaching location information to presence.
    Geographical location is captured in terms of Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates as well as civil location (city, street, building, etc.).