Slashdot Mirror


The Encryption Pioneer Who Was Written Out of History

nk497 writes "Clifford Cocks is one of three British men who developed an encryption system while working for the UK government in the early 1970s, but was forced to keep the innovation quiet for national security reasons. Just a few years later, their Public Encryption Key was developed separately by US researchers at Stanford and MIT, and eventually evolved into the RSA encryption algorithm, which now secures billions of transactions on the internet every day. 'The first I knew about [the US discovery] was when I read about it in Scientific American. I opened it one lunchtime and saw a description and thought, "Ah, that's what we did,"' he said. 'You don't go into the business to get external credit and recognition — quite the opposite. Quite honestly, the main reaction was one of complete surprise that this had actually been discovered outside.' The UK trio have now won recognition for their accomplishment in the form of the Milestone Award from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers."

4 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. Nice achievement but ... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's really not a milestone for anything if nobody can build on your results. It's certainly a great achievement to come up with an approach like that. However it contributes nothing to science if you don't publish it - the contribution was made by others. They weren't written out of history - they opted out.

  2. Re:They have a headstart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We owe a great debt of gratitude towards them.

    But in this case, it's like they didn't even exist. Closed research doesn't push man forward. Quite the opposite, imo.

  3. Re:They have a headstart by rpjs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well yes, Parliament cannot bind its successors, but that could apply just as well to recognising *US* independence.

    What might be the theoretical legal situation isn't always compatible with the real world situation. Sensible people defer to the real world.

  4. Re:They don't deserve recognition by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The development was made at the height of the Cold War. I imagine the secrecy had more to do with not handing a hugely robust encryption method over to perceived enemies at the height of a conflict fought through military intelligence, and that the decision was not made simply to annoy you personally.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?