Slashdot Mirror


Robot Controlled By Rat Brain

kkleiner writes "Kevin Warwick, once a cyborg and still a researcher in cybernetics at the University of Reading, has been working on creating biological neural networks that can control machines. He and his team have taken the brain cells from rats, cultured them, and used them as the guidance control circuit for simple wheeled robots. Electrical impulses from the bot enter the batch of neurons, and responses from the cells are turned into commands for the device. The cells can form new connections, making the system a true learning machine."

24 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. I for one would like to take this opportunity... by JeffSpudrinski · · Score: 5, Funny

    to greet our new rat overlords.

  2. Re:I for one would like to take this opportunity.. by msauve · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The same thing we do every day, Pinky, try to take over the world!"

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  3. Christine O'Donnell Was Right! by chill · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, not really, but it is as close as she is going to get on any subject.

    http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/09/odonnell-in-2007-scientists-have-created-mice-with-human-brains.php

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  4. Misleading title should say "... Rat Brain Cells" by chemicaldave · · Score: 5, Informative

    Brain cells, and an entire brain (especially a mammal's) are two separate beasts.

  5. True learning machine? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If it uses living cells from a rat brain, then it's not really a machine.

    1. Re:True learning machine? by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I suppose that would depend on how you define and perceive "machine." After all, is a microprocessor a machine? How about RAM? How about programmable chips that can reconfigure themselves into various networks of transistors? Is it because there is biology instead of nano-construction involved? The reality is that we don't yet have technology that can match what naturally occurring neural networks can do... not yet. But by making use of these small samples, we can begin to interface with them and then start building our own after learning to work with them enough to predict their behaviors.

      In time, the rat brain cells will be replaced with something synthetic. Once that is done, will it then be a machine even when the functionality becomes identical?

  6. Re:Misleading title should say "... Rat Brain Cell by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Separate beasts" is a bit of a muddled metaphor in this instance.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  7. Sentient cells? by Twinbee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What doesn't seem too clear after listening to the videos is why the rat's cells wouldn't want to crash the robot it's controlling, into the wall. Did the scientists program that in (perhaps wall crashes give the cells some kind of negative electrical stimulation), or did the cells have a mind of its own on that front?

    The difference is subtle because it means we have either a 'mere' replacement for computer chips, or potentially much more - a sentient clump of cells which want the 'best' for the robot it's controlling.

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    1. Re:Sentient cells? by golden+age+villain · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was wondering the same and honestly it seems fishy to me. There is no such thing as a negative electrical stimulation for neurons. Granted there is inhibition by GABA and some other neuromodulators. So unless they drop something on the tissue to induce some sort of learning, I simply don't see why any coherent behavior would emerge since there is no "motivation" to behave in one way rather than the other. From the wall-avoidance behavior video, my guess is that the sensors continuously feed the network until they detect a surface and then stop. In that case, the behavior would be hard-coded in the sensors and not in the network.

    2. Re:Sentient cells? by EdZ · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a SLNN (Self-Learning Neural Network) with actual neurons rather than virtual ones. You don't 'program' the cells, you provide inputs and 'reward' the correct output to those inputs, and let the neurons iteratively learn the correct weights in between.

  8. Re:Robot Controlled by Rat Brain by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mainly the neuron control helps the robot to avoid walls.

    So there must be messaging back into the rat. So the robot is to some extent controlling the rat brain.

  9. Mad Scientist by locallyunscene · · Score: 4, Funny

    *Cackles Maniacally*

    Now go, my ratbots. Go and wheel your way into the glorious future, heralding humanity's DOOM!

    *More Evil Laughter*

  10. Guy Ben-Ary was doing this five years ago by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Guy Ben-Ary is an artist who did a residency at the SymbioticA Research Lab at the University of Western Australia and then at the Potter Lab at Georgia Tech. During that time he created a system where a culture of rat brain neurons controlled a robotic pen controller to draw "art". Further, the two components (brain and arm) were geographically separated and communicated across the internet.

    MEART: The Semi Living Artist

    http://web.mit.edu/shkolnik/www/meart/

    http://www.fishandchips.uwa.edu.au/

  11. Re:I for one would like to take this opportunity.. by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's a rat cyborg who used to be our overlord. As to cyborgs, Warwick was never a cyborg. Implanting a chip that does nothing whatever doesn't make you a cyborg, but a pacemaker does. To be a cyborg you have to have a device implanted in your body that aids in the body's function; a pacemaker, an artificial hip or knee, a cochlear implant, an accomodating IOL, etc. Implanting a chip that does nothing is just stupid.

    Your grandma's probably a real cyborg.

  12. But is it newer and differenter than the by hellop2 · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
  13. Re:Huh? by slim · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wait, he used to be a cyborg and then decided a change of career was in order?!

    Kevin Warwick is a fanatical self-publicist. He implanted a chip in his arm, which was able to read nervous signals and forward them to a computer, whereby he could operate robot arms etc. By virtue of that, he proclaimed himself a cyborg. You can buy his book about it, "I, Cyborg" if you really want to.

  14. Re:Robot Controlled by Rat Brain by slim · · Score: 4, Informative

    I followed some links. http://journals.pepublishing.com/content/b31654739h7nk726/

    The cells are harvested from a rat foetus. They're grown in a special vessel, where they're in contact with an array of electrodes. They spontaneously arrange themselves into a neural network. The difficult part is training that network to do anything useful.

  15. Excellent! by bratwiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now we have a viable alternative for politicians.

    (And they can make their own robo-calls too! :-)

  16. Re:Human brains? by RadioElectric · · Score: 3, Informative

    Continuity of the "self" is a very interesting question which was considered by the philosopher John Locke, among many others (I mention Locke here because Lost fans might be reading who hadn't realised the connection).

    I think most people are familiar with The Ship of Theseus in some form or another.

  17. Re:Robot Controlled by Rat Brain by Niedi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The cells are harvested from a rat foetus. They're grown in a special vessel, where they're in contact with an array of electrodes. They spontaneously arrange themselves into a neural network. The difficult part is training that network to do anything useful.

    Which is exactly why it is NOT wired to a rat brain. These are cultured cells, seperated and grown in culture. So it's rat NEURONS but not a rat's brain. Calling it a rat brain would be like calling a heap of randomly wired intel-made-transistors a core2duo.

  18. Re:Brain: by snowraver1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh, I think so Brain... But where can we find a pastry shop open at this time of night?

    --
    Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  19. Re:Robot Controlled by Rat Brain by FiloEleven · · Score: 3, Funny

    Calling it a rat brain would be like calling a heap of randomly wired intel-made-transistors a core2duo.

    Sssssh....that's how I make money on eBay!

  20. Re:Brain: by Abstrackt · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
    (Pinky) Whoof, oh, I'd have to say the odds of that are terribly slim Brain.
    (Brain) True.
    (Pinky) I mean, really, when have I ever been pondering what you've been pondering?
    (Brain) To my knowledge, never.
    (Pinky) Exactly. So, what are the chances that this time, I'm pondering what you're pondering?
    (Brain) Next to nil.
    (Pinky) Well, that's exactly what I'm thinking, too.
    (Brain) Therefore, you are pondering what I'm pondering.
    (Pinky) Poit, I guess I am!

    --
    They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  21. Block Diagrams by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's too bad the article is so scant on details and so full of fanboyism. I would very much like to see the circuit diagrams and control system diagrams for this supposed neural control network. Kevin Warwick, if I remember correctly, has a history of making very bold claims and announcing certain successes that don't quite live up to his descriptions when viewed critically...or for that matter when viewed at all. Supposedly, he is using a feedback control system involving these neural cells to force some kind of output. I'd like to see that control scheme. Are the neurons part of the plant or part of the state estimator? Is he controlling rates, position, accelerations, or some combination therein? Are the state variables (velocity, acceleration, whatever) fed back into the neural network and compared against a predicted or commanded state? He is claiming to have developed a neuron based control system but there are absolutely no details about the control system itself so I am very wary of this claim.

    So far as I know, the only thing a neuron, or batch of neurons, can do is process an electrical signal from one end to another. If that's the case I fail to see how these neurons are controlling anything. I don't see how they could be used to calculate or predict any state at all. If all they are doing is transferring the analog signal from a batch of sensors, and then delivering those signals to a microcontroller or something, then they are not controlling the system at all, they are simply acting as biological wires. If they are rerouting sensory signals to various parts of the circuit based on level of input, that would be something worth noting, but I am not sure how a batch of neurons could do that. Furthermore, Rodney Brookes was able to do pretty much the same thing with transistor sets and analog sensors years ago when he developed his robotic bug brain...so it's not like such a control scheme hasn't been cooked up before. It would be great to see the details of the work to know what Warwick is actually up to this time, but I have a sneaking suspicion that his neural controller is nothing more than a classic analog or digital controller that uses a batch of neurons to transfer signals in the exact same manner that wires or a transistor bank could do. I want details.