Slashdot Mirror


Electromechanical Switches Could Reduce Future Computers' Cooling Needs

Earthquake Retrofit writes "Science Daily is reporting that researchers at Case Western Reserve University have taken the first step to building a computer capable of operating in extreme heat. Te-Hao Lee, Swarup Bhunia and Mehran Mehregany have made electromechanical switches — building blocks of circuits — that can take twice the heat that would render electronic transistors useless. 'The group used electron beam lithography and sulfur hexafluoride gas to etch the switches, just a few hundred nanometers in size, out of silicon carbide. The result is a switch that has no discernable leakage and no loss of power in testing at 500 degrees Celsius. A pair of switches were used to make an inverter, which was able to switch on and off 500,000 times per second, performing computation each cycle. The switches, however, began to break down after 2 billion cycles and in a manner the researchers do not yet fully understand. ... Whether they can reach the point of competing with faster transistors for office and home and even supercomputing, remains to be seen. The researchers point out that with the ability to handle much higher heat, the need for costly and space-consuming cooling systems would be eliminated.'"

22 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. Steampunk by russotto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Miniaturized relays are interesting, but an inverter which operates at 0.0005 Ghz is less interesting. Somehow I don't think we'll be seeing this replace electronics anytime soon. (well, except in lithium battery microcontrollers :-) ). Although it would be interesting technology for a steampunk novel.

    1. Re:Steampunk by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny
      [X] I would have gotten first post if I hadn't been stuck with one of those 0.5 megaHURTz "computing devices", you insensitive clod!

      Oops - gotta go - the device has a lifetime expectancy of only 1 hour, 7 minutes even at this slow speed.

      Next time, I'll boot up that old 4.77 mhz PCjr.

    2. Re:Steampunk by msauve · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "an inverter which operates at 0.0005 Ghz is less interesting. Somehow I don't think we'll be seeing this replace electronics anytime soon."

      As you alluded to, there are billions of microcontrollers out there running at less than 0.5 MHz. Heck, the good ol' Mostek 6502 ran at 1 MHz, and started an industry (KIM-1, Commodore PET, Apple ][, etc.) This is still in the research stage, but even at the current speeds, useful processors could be built (but apparently not last very long), especially since this would open new markets where traditional semiconductor gates won't function.

      But, even short of a full processor, there could be uses for logical applications (gate arrays).

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re:Steampunk by electrostatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Miniaturized relays are interesting, but an inverter which operates at 0.0005 Ghz is less interesting. Somehow I don't think...

      This is an incorrect and unfair assertion -- unfair by stating the switching rate in GHz.

      In the real world, DC-DC inverters run below 1 MHz. From Wikipedia:
      "Unlike a linear power supply, the pass transistor of a switching mode supply switches very quickly (typically between 50 kHz and 1 MHz) between full-on and full-off states, which minimizes wasted energy."

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switched-mode_power_supply/

    4. Re:Steampunk by picoboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just to be clear, processors don't run at the toggle frequency (f-sub-t) of an inverter. At best, a CPU will run somewhere south of 1/10th of the inverter toggle frequency. So we're talking more like 50 kHz, probably slower.

      Not saying that there aren't applications for a really slow CPU running in a 500 degree C environment. (Like my DVR? Chuckle...)

  2. Too big, too slow, too fragile by Bobnova · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hundreds of nanometers is rather larger then the current tech 32nm. These are going to have to get quite a bit smaller, faster, and more durable before they stand a chance. A two billion cycle limit is the worst part i think, my cpu did that in the last .66 seconds.

  3. Relays are back! by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Informative

    I tried to tell them that tubes and transistors were just a fad. Relays were good enough for the Z4 and they're good enough for us. These kids and their newfangled gadgets...

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Relays are back! by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are STILL applications where vacuum tubes are better than transistors. Guitar amps and other pieces of audio equipment is a prime example. I wouldn't consider an amp that wasn't tube, nor would most serious guitarists. Many audiophiles also swear by tubes, for dynamic range and warmth. If you want a two way radio system to be able to work during a nuclear blast, only tubes will do, as the EMF will render transistors useless.

      I would not be shocked to see some new application for tubes or tube-like technology. Tubes are pretty reliable, can take insane punishment, operate in a variety of environments, have exceptional range, tolerate wide variances in input strength and have a reasonable lifetime, even if shorter than transistors.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  4. Impervious to electromagnetic radiation by Alain+Williams · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Presumably (says I having read the article but not knowing much more about this) the mechanical switches:
    • will not generate electromagnetic radiation. This will eliminate the need for tempest protection, ie the bad guys can't evesdrop by picking up radio waves — although I wonder if they could ''listen'' to the clacking of the relays
    • will not be succeptible to destruction by EMP (electromagnetic pulse)

    Both attributes that the military would like.

    1. Re:Impervious to electromagnetic radiation by Skapare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If there is current, there is electromagnetic radiation. And the EMP could create a current transient high enough to cause an arc across the switch contact, which could have temperatures far far in excess of 500 C and melt or fuse the tiny switch. There may be arcs already at the normal operating current wearing it out.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Impervious to electromagnetic radiation by Rigrig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only the switching is mechanical, there's still current running through the switches so you still get electromagnetic radiation.

      --
      **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
    3. Re:Impervious to electromagnetic radiation by MattskEE · · Score: 3, Informative

      Presumably (says I having read the article but not knowing much more about this) the mechanical switches:

      How prescient ;-)

      No, when they mention radiation in the article it's because these devices are radiation-hard, i.e. they will last a long time in a radioactive environment such as many satellites fly in. Standard silicon CMOS devices on the other hand degrade very quickly because charged particles get trapped in the gate oxide changing the gate threshold, degrading performance, and then eventually killing the device. The silicon crystal itself is more vulnerable to defects from radiation, which increases channel resistance, again degrading performance and killing the device.

      The SiC MEMs devices are more robust because SiC is more robust at high temperatures and radiation filled environments, plus as a primarily mechanical system rather than electrical, it will probably be more tolerant to crystal defects.

      In a computer this will emit just as much electromagnetic radiation as a silicon chip because the radiation comes from the flow of current being turned on and off. It doesn't matter one bit if you do it with a vacuum tube, BJT, MOSFET, or MEMs device, you will get electromagnetic radiation.

      It may be more robust to EMP than a Si-CMOS device, but it will still be vulnerable to contact degradation when an EMP causes breakdown of the air or vacuum dielectric.

      The military does love the idea of MEMs switches, more so for radar/comms, but they got burned bad after DARPA and DOD agencies funded 10's of millions, or probably more, in R&D with no useful results. The main problem with MEMs switches has always been reliability, which you will see is also a problem in the MEMs devices being promoted in this article.

  5. Two billion cycles by Skapare · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... is easily explained. There is a flaw in the design. Someone apparently made the "wear out expiration" register signed instead of unsigned.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  6. Energy conversion to heat still exists by Technician · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are two sources of heat in modern semiconductor CPU's.

    One is leakage, the heat generated by current times resistance squared in transistors that are off.

    The higher current that is related to the clock speed is the heat generated by transistors that are turned on using the same current times resistance squared.

    To keep the on current at a bare minimum, transistors are paired with one on and one off so the current through the pair should be zero except for leakage. The current flows when they are clocked and the capacitance (stored voltage) of the wire between transistors and gate capacitance of the MOSFET it drives supplies current during switching.

    How does this no heat switch avoid the current of switching the capacitance between the switches. From what I can tell is this part is able to handle higher temperatures. I do not see it as a no power (no heat generated) device.

    Silicon Nitride has much higher resistance than most metals. Due to the resistance and temperature resistance, it is often used as hot surface ignition in gas appliances. Current through the switches will create heat. It is unavoidable.

    At it's current speed of 0.000.5 GHZ clock speed, I can believe the current power consumption is very low. How does this stack up to an Atom CPU clocked at 0.000.5 GHZ?

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  7. Yet another "breakthrough" by BarneyGuarder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a research idea that MAY be useful, the demise of CMOS silicon has been highly exaggerated.

    From the summary:

    "an inverter, which was able to switch on and off 500,000 times per second" -> 500kHz is not so great

    "however, began to break down after 2 billion cycles" or about 1 second at current processor speeds. That increases to 4000 seconds at 500kHz, or a little more than an hour.

    Also, we can put billions of error free transistors on a chip for a few dollars. THAT is the real hurdle that nothing else has been able to clear yet. We will likely be with silicon for a while after it stops shrinking for this reason.
       

  8. Quit talking about gigahertz by AdamHaun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nobody's going to use this for desktop CPUs. The whole point is that the switches work at 500 degrees C, where silicon doesn't. This technology would be used for embedded control in extremely hostile environments, where 500 kHz would be just fine. The article names the inside of a jet engine and the surface of Venus as examples.

    --
    Visit the
  9. Re:Fire code by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We had the opposite problem.

    The sprinkler activation system was disconnected at all times (excepting inspection). That made me feel safe.

    Eventually -I- figured out what was wrong with the system and fixed it, and with the alarms cleared they felt safe enough to put the activators back on.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  10. These would be great for high-end test equipment by smellsofbikes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I do test circuit hardware design and we use standard relays all over the board, for switching bits of circuitry into and out of contact with an integrated circuit we're testing. We use mechanical relays because of the same reasons they say: zero leakage current when they're open, and extremely low resistance when they're closed, which semiconductor switches just can't equal. The problem is the lifetime of the relays, so we have to socket them all (which, when you're building a board with 500 relays on it, is a significant time and money sink) and replace them pretty often on high-running parts (some of our parts have been in high-volume production for 20 years.) Plus they're big and take up the majority of the board. Having a device that's tiny and can last a billion cycles would be completely awesome.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  11. Re:Slow processors by Announcer · · Score: 2, Informative

    The venerable 6502 was also the heart of the VIC 20. A slightly modified/improved version was used in what was the most ubiquitous personal computer, the Commodore 64. Although running at only 1Mhz, most of its instructions executed in less than 3 clock cycles, making for some pretty efficient and fast ML code.

    --
    Willie...
  12. 2 billion ops? by Lobachevsky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First we have flash memory can that only be written to N number of times, and now they're building a cpu that can only do N computations?

    1. Re:2 billion ops? by Lanteran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      planned obsolescence at its peak.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
  13. NASA by pablo_max · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seems like something interesting for planetary exploration where standard CPUs on a probe would be rendered useless in a matter of hours. Much as the equipment sent to Venus.