Slashdot Mirror


The Hackintosh Guide

An anonymous reader writes "A 'Hackintosh' is a computer that runs Apple's OS X operating system on non-Apple hardware. This has been possible since Apple's switch from IBM's PowerPC processors to Intel processors a few years ago. Until recently, building a PC-based Mac was something done only by hard-core hackers and technophiles, but in the last few months, building a Hackintosh PC has become much easier. Benchmark Reviews looks at what it's possible to do with PC hardware and the Mac Snow Leopard OS today, and the pros and cons of building a Hackintosh computer system over purchasing a supported Apple Mac Pro."

11 of 453 comments (clear)

  1. It's not "the" guide by Artifex · · Score: 4, Informative

    It even says on the first page,

    This is not a detailed guide on building your own Hackintosh; it's a description of my personal experience building one, and how the result compared with my existing Mac Pro. If you want to build your own Hackintosh, there are many comprehensive resources on the Web. I've found Insanely Mac to be very useful.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
    1. Re:It's not "the" guide by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Informative

      Bah. Who needs to build a Hackintosh? I have Snow Leopard running in VirtualBox.

  2. Re:Mac vs. PC by Pojut · · Score: 4, Informative

    While I agree with your point, separating them into Mac and PC labels makes it easy for conversation regarding the two. It's a convenience thing.

  3. What? by DurendalMac · · Score: 3, Informative

    building a PC-based Mac was something done only by hard-core hackers and technophiles

    What? This is a load of crap. Granted, it's not the simpest thing to do, but I'd say it was two years ago that hackintoshing became simple enough for the somewhat technical to figure it out.

    1. Re:What? by Pojut · · Score: 4, Informative

      Indeed...for example, the Dell Mini 9 has been notoriously easy to make into a Hackintosh for quite a while. Hell, even Gizmodo posted a walkthrough in early 2009.

  4. Re:Mac vs. PC by CajunArson · · Score: 5, Informative

    A mac is a personal computer. PC stands for personal computer. Can we please stop using the terms as if they are mutually exclusive?

      I can tell you are an old-school Mac fan from the 1980's - pre-Jobs '90s from the pedantry. Now please go tell Apple what you just told us since they just finished a years long "Mac vs. PC" ad campaign that flies in the face of what you just said. I'm not even going to bother with the YouTube links at this point.

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
  5. Re:Imagine if you had to Hack Windows to run on a by NiceGeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    "I know of no DRM in Amiga OS to make sure it wasn't running on hardware Commodre hadn't been paid for."

    There isn't any DRM in OS X either. It's a matter of drivers, and EFI.

  6. Re:Imagine if you had to Hack Windows to run on a by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Informative

    Connectix Virtual PC was released in 1997. That was, what, 13 years ago? I wouldn't call that "relatively recently."

  7. Wish Apple put some work on OSX by HuguesT · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sorry if this sounds like a lament,

    Apple doesn't like OS/X anymore. The platform has basically been stagnant since the inception of 10.6, in 2008. Hardware support is poor, even worse than Linux. For instance there is no way to make a Nvidia GTX460 run under OS/X at the moment, in spite of it being the best bang-for-the-buck video card right now. It was impossible to have an AMD 5xxx series run until only a few months ago! Performance is not good enough. From experience OS/X guzzle memory like no other OS I know. I use two boxes at work, a Linux HP PC with 4GB of RAM that never ever swaps, and a MBP laptop with 4GB of RAM that becomes slow as molasses after a week of use due to memory issues.

    I'm extremely disappointed in Apple's focus on the mobile platform at the moment. There is only so much that can be done with a telephone and a hobbled tablet, nice though it may be.

    I have some experience with Hackintosh. In my opinion, be prepared for a world of hurt, very comparable to the Linux experience of 10 years ago. Basic features not working (e.g suspend-to-disk), no support, needing to be very careful about what hardware can be accommodated, performance issues, and very shaky future. Apple could basically pull the plug anyday. At the end of it a little more software is available, from the big editors. Realistically a lot of the free software tools that I like do not run as well as under Linux (for instance Inkscape).

    I used to like the OSX development tools but they are not portable, I wasted a lot of time with them, so this is as basic as I can make it now, so my software runs everywhere.

    1. Re:Wish Apple put some work on OSX by RManning · · Score: 3, Informative

      From experience OS/X guzzle memory like no other OS I know. I use two boxes at work, a Linux HP PC with 4GB of RAM that never ever swaps, and a MBP laptop with 4GB of RAM that becomes slow as molasses after a week of use due to memory issues.

      I have an entirely different experience. I code on my MBP 10 - 15 hours every single day and I'll go many weeks between reboots. I have 4GB of memory and it's running just fine. I nornally run Eclipse, Tomcat, Postgres, Photoshop, a couple terminal windows, and Open Office all the time.

    2. Re:Wish Apple put some work on OSX by nine-times · · Score: 5, Informative

      Is this a troll? The platform has been stagnant since 2008? Wikipedia says OSX 10.6 was released in August 2009, just over a year ago. Even if it had been 2 years, taking 2 years to release a major new OS release is not strange.

      As far as all the poor performance and memory problems, those don't seem common to me. Maybe one of your installed apps has a memory leak?