Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

AOL Spends $1M On Solid State Memory SAN

Posted by Soulskill on from the go-big-or-go-home dept.

Lucas123 writes "AOL recently completed the roll out of a 50TB SAN made entirely of NAND flash in order to address performance issues with its relational database. While the flash memory fixed the problem, it didn't come cheap, at about four times the cost of a typical Fibre Channel disk array with the same capacity, and it performs at about 250,000 IOPS. One reason the flash SAN is so fast is that it doesn't use a SAS or PCIe backbone, but instead has a proprietary interface that offers up 5 to 6Gb/s throughput. AOL's senior operations architect said the SAN cost about $20 per gigabyte of capacity, or about $1 million. But, as he puts it, 'It's very easy to fall in love with this stuff once you're on it.'"

7 of 158 comments (clear)

  1. AOL? by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is surprising to me is not the amount of money spent on what was bought, but the fact that AOL has any performance issues at all. They still have users? They have an entire database of users?

    --
    You can't handle the truth.
    1. Re:AOL? by T+Murphy · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, they think they still have lots of users. The cancellation department is separate from HQ- at 56k it's still going to be a few decades before the suits finish receiving all the cancellation notices.

      --
      My webcomic
    2. Re:AOL? by Mikkeles · · Score: 4, Funny

      Me Too!!!

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    3. Re:AOL? by mark72005 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think it just means they are still billing users who cancelled years ago, per standard practice.

      Also, there are users who wanted to cancel years ago, but are still lost in the phone tree. Those are still active accounts too.

  2. Re:What? by Jimmy+King · · Score: 5, Funny

    As long as you come really cheap, I can probably get you on where I work. You won't get cool hardware like that, but you can have the other half. Management seems to be ok with substandard work as long as apologizing to the customers continues to be cheaper than doing a good job or buying the hardware to cover up the poor job.

  3. Re:What? by hxnwix · · Score: 3, Funny

    You could probably get by with a cloud of 486s, but why the fuck would you bother?

  4. Re:What? by konohitowa · · Score: 3, Funny

    As long as you come really cheap, I can probably get you on where I work. You won't get cool hardware like that, but you can have the other half. Management seems to be ok with substandard work as long as apologizing to the customers continues to be cheaper than doing a good job or buying the hardware to cover up the poor job.

    You could always take a long lunch, cross the bridge from Redmond to Seattle, and apply at Amazon. I'm sure Microsoft would give you a couple of hours off to do that, right?