New Fish Species Discovered 4.5 Miles Under the Ocean

eldavojohn writes "The University of Aberdeen's Oceanlab (a partner in the recent census of marine life) has discovered a new snailfish. That might not sound very exciting, unless you consider that its habitat is an impressive four and a half miles below the ocean's surface (video). If my calculations are correct, that's over ten and a half thousand PSI, or about seventy-three million Pascals. The videos and pictures are a couple years old, as the team has traveled around Japan, South America and New Zealand to ascertain the biodiversity of these depths. The group hopes to eventually bring specimens to the surface. It seems the deepest parts of the ocean, once thought to be devoid of life, are actually home to some organisms. As researchers build better technology for underwater exploration, tales of yore containing unimaginable monsters seem a little more realistic than before."

Comments

Units

[pete-classic]

That's about 715 atmospheres, in case anyone else is interested in remotely relatable units.

-Peter

Re:Units

[pz]

Although it's an astonishing pressure, it's static, and equilibrated. That is, just as atmospheric pressure is balanced by the pressure in our bodies, and therefore individual cells and organs do not have to withstand much if any of a pressure differential, the same will be true of these creatures despite the massive depths. The creatures aren't pressure vessels: Bringing them to the surface creates a huge pressure differential, causing them to rupture.

Re:Depth is irrelevant.

[jjohnson]

What is their food source?

Apparently there's a steady rain of nutrition from above, basically. Feces, skin cells, plant material, cast off crap... they live in a constant of surface particles wending their way down, much of which is edible to them.

How did their species evolve to make sure they were born with the same internal pressure?

You don't decide to be born at the same internal pressure as your parents, any that you, the poster, decided to be born as an oxygen breathing mammal. Fish at that pressure necessarily breed more fish at the same pressure--any who leave the safe pressure zone die rather than breed. How did you decide not to be born underwater? Your parents avoiding death by drowning in order to give birth to you.

Re:Depth is irrelevant.

[blair1q]

Obligatory Mythbusters reference.

Fish have been reported deeper before

[AC-x]

An expedition to the Mariana Trench back in 1960 at a depth of 6.8 miles reported "a number of small sole and flounder swimming away". so it's been known for 50 years that vertebrates can survive at extreme depths (the deepest part of the ocean no less)

Re:Sounds like..

[Grim Leaper]

CSI: Miami? See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mznsEcZlM2I&feature=related

Re:Goldilocks & exoplanets

[Anonymous Coward]

I can reply as an astronomer: 'Goldilocks' more ore less only refers to conditions that allow liquid water, which on earth seems to be the the only condition that must hold. An energy source will always be found, but afaik, no water == no life.

Astronomers are not so close minded as you seem to suppose they are, but you have to start somewhere. It is hard enough (==impossible atm) to determine whether a planet can sustain life as we know it. Once we are able to do that, we will also look for other signs of life. From an astronomers perspective the entire habitable-planet-finding race is mostly a technological thing.

Quite interesting research though: Detecting seasons, atmosphere variations (clouds), elements in the atmosphere (oxygen), pictures and spectra of individual planets.